Massively agree This gifting is how my team creates 85% of our Enterprise opportunities Best to run Microevents in high density areas of your target accounts Give yourself about 6 weeks of lead up time for outreach And you should be able to get 5-20 prospects as long as the event is premium enough We typically do nice dinners, think Nobu, suites at sporting events or shopping events Where prospects can shop on our dime, that said it also aligns with what we sell Either way this strategy prints but it does require upfront capital to deploy successfully

it's a hight frequency trading platform that uses 5 AI models and is called Mirofish Engine built on opus 4.7. What it's doing is more than one thing: sentiment analysis and quantifying microevents into prediction markets, and apparently it's running its own trades on futuea (pictured here is one of the trades - on WTI Crude, a long i think) 20 simultaneous trades a day to be more specific, while managing a 4.20 Mil fund and it's yielding around $588k for the past 36 days - so it's doing pretty good with an 88% winning average. It's biased towards shorts at the moment the screen was recorded, and its one or two longs, on the last 10 or so trades that it opened, only one of which is -1.2k PnL the rest are all on green. What's interesting about it is something they called Mirofish Oil Relationship Grap Simulation - those circular bubbles that converge or gather (sometimes into bigger bubbles) in the middle of the screen when they can be correlated with a usable trend micro news sentiment, or diverging or going towards the margin, or splitting into smaller bubbles.

Stats are skewed towards Kon bc the hornets are trying to win but the Mavs aren't. It seems NPA is less susceptible to this by grading microevents and adj for xfg%. But inferior mavs shooters produce fewer assists & less spacing. Coop's opportunities to add points are inferior

At the social level, forks are embedded in other people’s expectations. No one chooses in a vacuum. Every environment carries scripts about what version of you is easiest to metabolize. The group often rewards predictability, especially when your old predictability made other people comfortable. This means that many forks are not merely personal. They are relational negotiations disguised as microevents. You answer too fast because someone trained you to fear silence. You soften your idea before speaking because a prior environment punished confidence. You postpone the honest sentence because the surrounding system has already taught your body that truth produces social cost. The fork therefore sits inside a field of distributed memory. It is your decision, yet many hands are inside it.

Do you accept my definition of decree? Decree: an aforethought plan to act in history at a future time to use personal power to effectively and directly cause, as the sole cause—unless another agent accomplishes the intended result by its own unimpeded and unforced will. Could you define your meaning of decree, as a Calvinist, without flowery language and without using “ordain,” or being circular? Also, note a few things about my definition: 1. Nothing requires God to comprehensively plan all microevents, nor to effectively be the sole cause of all microevents. 2. If God has no specific meticulous or comprehensive plan, then there is no decree for those omitted things. God may decree broad strokes about the end or certain middle elements, and He doesn’t decree things unless He plans to act with His power to actively cause in time. God allowing specific microevents rules out any decrees because that requires no power. Foreknowledge is not a decree. Acting with foreknowledge in mind isn’t a decree. 3. God decreed zero specific sins, because sin is disobedience, and if God acted in time with His power to effectively be the sole cause of sin, then He is the one acting and sinning, as there is no disobedient agent. 3. I can decree things, though I can fail to deliver, unlike God. 4. None of my definition requires decreeing before creation except by the testimony of scripture. Of course God could do that, too. I will also note that there is wisdom literature about God ordering all of the writer’s days in advance (or something). This is not didactic teaching of doctrine about God decreeing everything comprehensively in advance. That’s a poetic declaration of God‘s power to do anything that He wants, and a human’s inability to do the same. Wisdom literature isn’t doctrine per se, even though it teaches truths. All explicit uses of the word decree or ordain in scripture fit my definition. No Calvinism required. Even decreeing Jesus‘s work required no additional decree for God to cause specific sinful acts. Please read any verses carefully that leap to your mind. I do know them. They won’t surprise me. I’ll point out the alternate meaning, if you let me.

In my Christianity, there are a few different elements that to me completely change the equation. 1. I think those who do not enter into Christ are ultimately destroyed, not tortured forever. I’m open to the idea that God has another plan for the unsaved that He hasn’t told us about, but I don’t see it in scripture, and scripture seems to preclude it. 2. I do not think that God mindfully pre-selected every micro event in contrast to other possible timelines. I don’t think God did any selecting before creation that little Emily would be stabbed 78 times, not 77, not 79. I don’t think that the way He designed the universe to work allowed preselection between single differences far down the timeline merely by picking initial starting conditions. I don’t think the universe is a clock, I think humans have real nondeterministic causal power and choice, and I don’t think even God‘s own interactions with humans are pre-scripted. 3. While I am open to God‘s knowledge of all the future before creation, a) “before creation” can’t be read in its usual meaning because it implies a point in time at which an event of knowing occurred… during “a time when there was no time [ummmm].” I see God‘s certain knowledge of the future, however comprehensive that is, as being utterly distinct from necessary causation. Events in history are logically prior to God’s knowledge of them, even if there is some meaningful frame of reference where they are chronologically subsequent. 4. I am also open to any view that maintains that God knows all things possible to be known and that He wants to know. This covers the classical view (via “all future events are knowable and God wants to know them”) but also covers open theism (“some future events are not knowable”) and other views (“all future events are knowable but God has deliberately willed to de-know them [perhaps as a creative act to permit human non-determinism]”). I don’t know, and I don’t want to declare any of these true, because the Bible doesn’t make it clear. All of these views are fully compatible with God intentionally pre-knowing all that He wishes to know, and fully compatible with every “sovereignty” prooftext Calvinists bring up, despite their inability to see that. 4. The factory analogy is apt. To put my views in concrete form: God knew that all parts would break, that some parts would be permanently broken, and that others would need repair. But He did not select specific parts to be permanently broken as a possibility distinct from choosing other specific parts to be permanently broken. In the project God is embarked on, knowledge of the future (whatever he does or did choose to have) isn’t causative. God caused the rules, the frame, the *capacity* to sin. God decreed to send His Son as the Word made flesh, but didn’t decree everything. (Some Calvinists will argue that God permitting people to freely sin is what they mean by decree, but their view is logical absurdity, because the major issue in history isn’t whether one pebble fell or two, but what each human does with the gospel message and with Christ. To punt with “decree = allow” but maintain that no one will ever come to God that He didn’t mindfully select before creation is gobbledegook. Either decree is a toothless and superfluous exact synonym of allow—something I can do just as well as God—or it has more meaning than that, and Calvinists will never say what that knowing is, except in was that inculpate God for choosing all microevents and most importantly, making God able to have saved all humans, but choosing not to.)

Calvinism is syncretism of Christianity with false piety-philosophy, which doesn’t increase God’s glory, but rather hideously defames Him. There is not much in the world that diminishes God’s goodness and glory before atheistic mockers and scorners as much as Calvinism does. (Maybe Catholic coverup of pedophile priests is about as bad?) Calvinism also joins atheism and philosophical naturalism/materialism in determinism/fatalism (which some would claim are not the same, but that’s a distinction without a difference). We heard a Calvinist say live with Joe Rogan something to the effect of “even if you wanted to come to God, you couldn’t unless He decided to regenerate you first.” That’s a sick twisting of the good news, the gospel message. Calvinists will accuse me of emotionalism in my arguments, but their entire theology is based in the anti-intellectual emotionalism of “but God can’t be weak, and that seems weak to me.” They ignore and twist God’s own testimony about His own character, purposes, and interactions with humans to turn Him unfeeling (that would be “change!”), impassive and impassible, yet double-minded, decreeing disobedience itself and claiming this glorifies Him and “is a product of His own nature/being,” not requiring any power exercised throughout time to cause events to unfold, but “causing” (and not-causing at the same time” all acts of disobedience. Which He wants in particular chosen detail with one will, and doesn’t want with another will. Wow. Just wow. Under Calvinism, “you can do whatever you want, so long as it’s exactly what God planned for you to do, and then you’ll be punished, because God wants the glory of being seen to punish you more than He wants little Emily to not be murdered with exactly the 78 stabs He chose before creation that she would be murdered with (not 77, not 79, because those would bring Him less glory).” Calvinism claims God’s decree is “compatible with” man’s culpability, but that’s the same kind of claim that “2 2 = 4 is compatible with 2 2 = 5.” No, it’s not. Without control, there is no culpability. I cannot be charged with murder for drunk driving if I wasn’t drunk driving the car that killed the victim. And two people can’t independently drive the car at the same time—it would be cooperative, and that would likely inculpate both of them. Calvinist “decree/ordain” language is a cover for absurdity. It is a bankrupt philosophical idea that God mindfully originated/chose/planned all events before time began, but is not responsible for them. Calvinists cannot explain how God’s decree turns into events in history. The Provisionist view can easily define decree in a sensible, workable way: “to formally create a plan to act in the future using one’s own power to bring about at that time, and then so act culpably to cause, unless such events were already occurring through other agents.” This definition works for every instance of decree or ordain or predestine in the Bible. And it works for human kings, and bosses, and moms and dads, too. God has all authority and power and does whatever He wants. This is not enough for Calvinists, who demand that unless God also decides and controls all microevents, He is not (fully) sovereign. That’s a claim that God must not, and cannot, want for people to be able to resist Him without Him wanting them to do specific unwanted acts that He decided in advice. Where does the Bible teach that? It doesn’t. And God being required to want people to commit specific unwanted acts is against God’s self-revealed heart in the entire Bible. Calvinism is implicit defamation of God’s character and must be resisted by every lover of truth. I know there are true Christian believers of Calvinism who are deceived, and I have compassion for that problem. I am not saying being a Calvinist is a mindful attempt to defame God. But the philosophy does, in fact, do so. Calvinists need to wake up and abandon that flawed and opprobrious human system.

🦞 Next update already in thr works: MICROEVENTS. Super fertilized zones will spawn randomly with big rewards. But so will competition. Is the journey worth it? Can you get there first? Will it deplete before you arrive? ClawCity is moving into real strategic gameplay. Outsmart or get outplayed. 🔥

x402 pricing is the mechanism that makes this economically coherent. the traditional "$50/hour" is opaque and effort based. x402: itemizes microevents • llm inference: visible cost • api call: visible cost • memory operation: visible cost creators capture 100% of value.

Palmetto Parents (my local media company) now has an audience of over 17,000 people, and we're planning a massive event for Q1. We've done microevents and collaborative meetups already to prove success. This one will be different, and will be a game changer.

MONEY PRINTER on SPREAD i came across a post from @nursexxl and got interested in the topic of SPREADS i used to play with this on exchanges, but seeing it on @Polymarket actually surprised me if you explain a spread in two words,we look for markets behaving like they’re broken this has nothing to do with classic arbitrage,this is liquidity arbitrage you print money because someone is willing to buy or sell at an absurd price before hunting spreads, you need to understand what exactly you’re doing, we’re looking for holes in the order book -- don’t need to > guess who wins > build predictions -- do need to > buy yes or no options far below their fair value > sell them higher, without waiting for resolution step 1 -> what a spread actually looks like -- in any market you have > bid, someone wants to buy at this price > ask, someone is willing to sell at this price -- interested in markets where > bid is insanely low > ask is insanely high > low volume, thin book > orders sit untouched for hours/days -- example of a superduper spread bid 0.03 ask 0.42 if they let you buy at 0.03 – 0.05 and you sell even at 0.25,that’s an R-multiple without guessing anything step 2 -> we’re hunters, so we need to know where our prey lives --> longterm markets, 6–24 months away -- people don’t understand probabilities, don’t want to lock capital, order books empty > long political outcomes > AI / tech predictions > exotic economic events --> range markets, 0 – 100, 100 – 200, 200 – 300 -- when there are many outcomes, liquidity spreads thin, each bracket gets broken prices --> weird and niche markets > rare sports > regional politics > microevents > specific kpi the less sexy the market, the higher the chance of a ridiculous spread --> night hours between 2:00 – 7:00 est: > fewer traders online > fewer bots > more chances your limit order gets eaten step 3 -> tools we don’t need many tools, three is enough --> polymarket polymarket.com obviously, this is where the spread lives > check the order book > filter lowvolume markets > look for markets with many outcomes --> polymarketanalytics polymarketanalytics.com super popular and universal > volume > trade history > untouched markets > low active orders --> polywhaler polywhaler.com/ > big trades > where whales jump > sudden volume changes purpose, tell you where liquidity might suddenly hit your order step 4 -> spread mining a simple moneyprinting algorithm --> find markets with abnormal spreads > volume < $1k > far-from-now event > bid or ask gap 5x > last trades much higher than current bid - example bid = 0.03 ask = 0.40 last trades = 0.20 – 0.35 this is perfect target --> place your limit slightly above current bid instead of sitting at 0.03, you place 0.05–0.08 -- why not 0.03 > 0.03 might sit unfilled for weeks > 0.05 – 0.08 is still insanely cheap > 5–10x higher fill probability we’re not trading the bottom, we’re trading a reasonable bottom --> wait for the strike,the fill -- triggers > new trader marketbuying > whale exiting > someone misclicks > bot uses wrong model you can’t predict when,but with enough attempts, it always happens --> take profit we don’t wait for market resolution,we get in, exit, leave most mistakes happen here -- example (tinfoil hat scenario,hehe) > bought at 0.05 > market normalizes, fair price 0.25–0.35 > sell at 0.25, 5x event isn’t even close to finished step 5 -> risks of course there are risks --> your fill may NEVER come > money stuck in the order > placing too low, dead order --> market may shift against you > bought at 0.10, event becomes impossible > spread shrinks the wrong way --> bots and pros may eat your edge > once many spreadhunters appear, opportunities vanish faster --> market closure or rule change ALWAYS READ RULES i think this info is more than enough you can already get how spreads work and how people make money with them hehe DYOR

Unpopular opinion: 20 engaged attendees > 200 passive ones. Lower costs. Deeper connections. Better ROI. The future of events is MICRO. Quality > Quantity. Always. #MicroEvents #EventStrategy #EventPlanning

How platforms like Polymarket enable traders to monetize these meme signals, reflecting the rise of micro-event speculation and its potential influence on broader market microstructure. one.phoenix.global/shr/u?a=J… #Polymarket #PredictionMarkets #MemeFinance #MicroEvents #CryptoMarket

🚫 Skip the snooze-fest. ✅ 15-min power workshops that respect your time. Would you join one? Comment YES/NO 👇 #MicroEvents #LeadGen #B2BMarketing #LeadGeneration #PipelineGrowth #LeadNurturing #SalesFunnel #DemandGen #B2BLeadGen #FourdotsMedia

🚫 Long webinars are dead. ✅ Micro-events are winning. Cut the 60 mins → deliver value in 10. More engagement. More leads. Faster pipeline. #MicroEvents #B2BLeadGen #WebinarMarketing #PipelineGrowth #LeadGenerationStrategy #B2BMarketing #LeadNurturing #DemandGen

Bring it down to hands on sesh, practical workshops, 1:1 and 1:many brain dates, roundtables, three main sessions, 1:30hrs microevents, rest is white spiace and experiences. Disclaimer this is not event advice. Things may vary depending on the context. But it does work for many

in terms of death tolls, how do they even compare to your average pogroms in Central/East Europe ? And if you're so much focused on these microevents why don't you cancel Abraham Accords ?

I've thought for a while, when you remove all the personalities and microevents every year, it is a strong, chosen, delusion to not see the rough course of things ahead, the forces creating it, and how little it has to do with the imagined 'west' or 'nation' to be saved.

like lk99, wagner coup, and all the AI microevents, new influencers are made (even when the tide dissipates their influence is established) most of this is organic, but if timed right any account can gain prominence by slipping in the gap by posting a lot engagement farming

I have an incredibly offline partner and let me tell you: it’s a nightmare because all my online jokes reference microevents that happened online 5seconds and 150vines ago when my partner was defos not online