The universe is discrete and nonspatial.

Physics: Nothing really moves. 🤔 "This bizarre quantum phenomenon allows particles to pass through barriers they wouldn't be able to under classical physics." ~ @PhysInHistory There's no space Quantum tunnelling is evidence of nonspatiality imo. Space (distance, volume, etc.) is an abstract creation of the conscious mind. It doesn't exist. I'm not the only one who arrived at that conclusion. Great philosophers like Gottfried Leibniz and Immanuel Kant also denied the existence of a physical space. So did Nikola Tesla apparently. That was his main objection to Einstein's spacetime theories: you can't curve something that doesn't exist. Nonlocality = nonspatiality Particles don't pass through barriers during quantum tunnelling. They are instantly transported from one position to another. But this description is not entirely true. In a nonspatial universe, there is no movement from one location to another because there are no locations. It's called nonlocality. Nothing really moves in the intuitive sense. Since there is no space, the position of a particle is the intrinsic property of the particle. Movement is merely a change in a property. Nonlocality is equivalent to nonspatiality. All the strange phenomena observed in physics experiments can be explained by nonspatiality, including particle-wave duality. Video game programmers should have no trouble understanding nonspatiality. The position of an object in a video game is one of the properties of the object in memory. The data structure of the object never moves in memory. Only its position property is changed. Think of what you perceive on the screen as an abstraction. The same is true of real particles. Nature is much stranger than we suppose. I predict that big upheavals are coming to the world of physics that will transform human civilization. Brace yourselves. 😮

"What's the coolest science facts you know?" I know many cool things that will be accepted as facts in the not too distant future. Here are six off the top of my head: 1. Learning in the brain consists almost entirely of eliminating timing contradictions. 2. Unlike deep neural nets, the brain can perceive anything, whether or not it recognizes them. I call it "extreme perceptual generalization" or EPG. 3. There's only one speed in the universe, the speed of light. Nothing can move faster or slower. 4. Distance (space, volume, etc.) is a useful abstraction but it doesn't exist physically. It is a creation of the conscious mind. The universe is nonspatial. Quantum entanglement would be impossible otherwise. 5. The universe is discrete. Motion is made of discrete jumps. A jump is a discrete change in an intrinsic positional property. 6. The so-called "vacuum of space" is filled with energetic particles (photons). Nothing could move without this energetic field. Yes, it's free energy, lots of it. Once we figure out its properties, we'll develop ways to tap into it for superfast transportation and unlimited energy production. I have reasons to believe that big scientific revolutions are coming that will change everything. 😮🤔

Guys, do not fall for this Salafi argument, it is sophistry, you will find it everywhere, given to them by IT/IQ, on Asharis.com (Abu iyad website) too. 📮Summary: we do not affirm life, knowledge, power, will, etc, like the Salafis affirm it, they affirm these as temporal states, we deny temporality absolutely, therefore we are radically different from them, as there is no Tashbih between temporality and atemporality (just as none between spatial and nonspatial). If you affirm atemporal life it will be considered as a Tawil that negates, under their system, which makes you a Jahmi in their book, so, how would they claim to affirm same thing with Jahmis? Answer is, they don’t, it just rhetoric.

Einstein's light cone ignores the fact that we exist in a nonlocal (nonspatial) universe. Otherwise, he would have noticed that gravity is instantaneous, just like Newtonian gravity claims. The most brilliant man that ever walked the earth was not bright enough to understand nonlocality. Dear Lord. 🤦‍♂️ The fake-physics mafia deserves to believe in their own bullshit. 😀

In my opinion, the universe is discrete and nonspatial. Distance is a creation of the conscious mind. I believe that this model will replace current fruitcake physics in the not too distant future. A day is coming when physicists will be ashamed to talk about the "spacetime continuum", time dilation and all the other brain-dead inventions of the fake-physics mafia. I will dance in the streets when that happens. 😀

We need a new physics based on a discrete, nonspatial (nonlocal) universe governed by universal symmetry. PS. Einstein came to realize late in his life that continuity was bogus and wrote about his fears that it meant the end of his "entire castle in the air, gravitation theory included".

This seems like so much unaware word salad. Spatial metaphors applied to nonspatial experience? Metaphors of hierarchy? There is no depth or height or volume or quantities to consciousness. Slow music and nice words feel nice, but this is a language game more than it is a description of experience. Sad people will gobble this up as an idiom to adopt to feel less sad, another trendy meme.

APOLLO is a robust data management and delivery platform that allows you to manage all your spatial and nonspatial data in one simple catalog. You’ve made an investment in smart data. Make it work for you with APOLLO. go.hxgnsig.com/l/71752/2026-…

😂😂😂 Don’t talk about iq if you’re gonna get cooked like this A spatially extended God exists and your nonspatial god only exists in your mind.

Physics bits from my research. I love ruffling feathers on the weekend. 😁 "Simplicity is the signature of truth." ~ @fchollet Wow. The ARC-AGI Frenchman is full of wisdom lately. This is a rarity in the AI community. It's even more rare in the physics community where multiple bulls are sacrificed everyday on the altar of complexity. Why? Only because the crooked political leadership in physics know that they can use complexity to hide their bullshit. If the public doesn't understand your crappy science, you can get away with anything. 😠 Prediction: Here's a short list of braindead ideas in physics that simplicity will destroy in the not too distant future: 1. Spacetime. It's a block universe. Nothing can move in it. Huh? You heard it correctly the first time. In a sane world, this truth alone should have been enough to discard Einstein's spacetime theories a long time ago. 😁 2. Continuity. Even the ancient Greeks knew it was an absurd idea. Nature is discrete. Democritus used this understanding to predict the existence of atoms more than 2000 years ago! I can use it to calculate the precise values of the fundamental discrete units for length, time and mass, using the speed of light alone. See image. 3. General relativity. Einstein threw Occam's razor and Newton's simple and beautiful gravity equation in the trash and created a complex and illogical spacetime monstrosity just because he could not accept action at a distance. Remember: nothing can move in spacetime. 4. Infinity. Only fruitcakes and scammers believe in infinity. Besides, the absurdity of infinity is why there can be no continuity. 😁 5. Quarks. Quark theory is worse than general relativity. It's not only a complex monstrosity, it disappeared almost all the antimatter of the universe. Every third rate sci-fi movie has loved this disappearing act ever since. Then the quarkpots had the nerve to go around bragging about having discovered an anomaly of nature. Please. 🙄 6. Superposition. This is the pseudoscience behind quantum computing and infinite numbers of parallel universes. It's not even wrong, as Schrodinger showed with his half-dead cat in a box Gedankenexperiment. Nevertheless, its the darling of fruitcakes like David Deutsch. 🤦‍♂️ 7. Gravitational waves. The multi-billion dollar LIGO scam was designed to corroborate GR, not to falsify it, as a good scientific experiment should. The truth is that nature is nonlocal and gravity is instantaneous. This why Newtonian gravity works. In spite the incessant propaganda to suppress it, it works fine. Besides, gravitational waves need spacetime, which doesn't exist. 8. Time dilation. Nope. Time cannot dilate by simple definition. Motion in time of changing time is self-referential. A clock's ticking rate slows down simply because it has less energy, not because time dilates. Both Lorentz and Einstein were wrong to ignore mass in the Lorentz transformation. 9. Locality. Einstein dismissed nonlocality because he could not accept "spooky" action at a distance. The truth is that the universe is nonlocal, i.e., nonspatial. Distance/space/volume is a creation of conscious mind. It's how the mind separates objects. There is no separateness. The universe is one and position is just an variable intrinsic property of every particle. The mind can be easily fooled in perceiving distance as anyone who has used 3D virtual reality glasses can attest to. I could go on and on but I'm tired of typing. I need a beer and a fine cigar. It's my relaxation time. 🍺😃

Newtonian gravity is instantaneous. Yes, it is nonlocal but this has nothing to do with entanglement. Most people don't know this but, without realizing it, Newton discovered nonlocality which is the same thing as nonspatiality. Distance (space or volume) is an abstract creation of the mind. 🤔 PS. Einstein thought he knew better and declared that gravity traveled at c. He was mistaken. We live in a nonspatial universe. New physics is coming. 😮

Two Predictions Thanks to widespread literacy and the unprecedented ease of access to humanity's accumulated scientific knowledge in the age of computers and the internet, I foresee a Kuhnian revolution in two important fields of research within the next decade or so: artificial intelligence and physics. Both of them will radically transform human civilization in ways no one can predict. Physics Physics has been been on the wrong path for so long, most of it will be cut off and discarded. It is so bad, humanity hasn't made any advance in its understanding of gravity in over a century. The deplorable state of physics research is not because scientists are incompetent but because the scientific machinery has been taken over by politicians and wicked actors. I foresee a seismic paradigm shift when the continuity and spacetime of the old order are abandoned and replaced with a nonspatial, nontemporal and discrete universe model. There will be a before and an after. Artificial Intelligence The late philosopher, Hubert Dreyfus, correctly understood AI to be a degenerate research program based on rationalist philosophy even though AI researchers did not realize it. They still don't. Dreyfus predicted its failure to solve intelligence. He correctly understood that the existentialist philosophy of Martin Heidegger and Maurice Merleau-Ponty contained the correct insights that would turn the ship around. The AI community ridiculed Dreyfus and shunned him. They still do today and they are still failing to crack intelligence after 70 years of nonstop research effort and over a trillion dollars invested. Rationalist philosophy is an offshoot of the age of clock makers and the Victorian era of machine automation. It has been wildly successful. It transformed the world as we knew it. The internet and computers would not exist without it. But intelligence is not automation. I foresee an imminent schism in AI research whereby the rising Heideggerian mindset will divorce itself from rationalist automation and marry neuroscience. I believe that this new science of autonomy will soon bear fruit. Intelligence will be cracked in our lifetimes. There will be a before and an after. The image is a clip from "Why Heideggerian AI Failed and how Fixing it would Require making it more Heideggerian" by Hubert Dreyfus. cid.nada.kth.se/en/Heidegger…

Unconventional physics bits from my research. Big changes are coming. One year before he died, after a lifetime of trying and failing to formulate a universal field theory based on the continuum, Albert Einstein admitted defeat. He foresaw the total collapse of modern physics, including his own theories. In 1954, he wrote the following to his friend Besso: “I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics.” ~ from "Subtle is the Lord" by Abraham Pais There's a reason there has been no progress in humanity's understanding of gravity in over 120 years! The reason is that the powers that rule global science did not allow any competition to their paradigm. They used massive propaganda and relentless indoctrination to protect their golden egg. Many sensed correctly that the egg was sterile and rotten on the inside. They were lone voices crying in the wilderness. One hundred and twenty years of solitude. I weep. My take is that modern physics is wrong about both continuity and space. A discrete, nonspatial universe is the wrecking ball that will bring the entire edifice down. It will be Biblical, as the saying goes. 😱😰 I believe it’s coming in our lifetimes. Radical changes to human civilization will follow soon after, especially in the fields of energy production and transportation. It will be the dawning of a new wonderful age. 🌄🌤️🙂

The universe is both discrete and nonspatial.

These guys keep recycling old ahh arguments, ilm is a sifah dhatiyya explicitly affirmed, and it's a ma'nawi, He treats “ilm" and “fawqitta” as functionally identical and principally the same in meaning. But one is a nonspatial conceptual attribute, the other is a spatial one

The way I see it, if it turns out that reality is discrete and nonspatial (a certainty), almost all of physics will be thrown in the trash, including Weinstein's crackpottery. 😁 PS. Nonspatial = distance is a creation of the mind and doesn't exist.

if you want a good parallel its more like spinoza's third knowledge beatitude, it's conscious only in this sense, which is to say it's nonreflexive/nonrelational/nonspatial, and essentially consciousness of its own nonrelation, this is how transcendental is used imo.

Bro you again, I am not thin skinned, and I don’t insult people irrationally, I am more concerned about his idea and how he thinks, for instance, his position is that God is nonspatial, you know that? So, why is he attacking us when we hold the same? and sparing Salafis

Yeah, he denies Jism if it entails all those imperfections I listed, but if you get rid of them, then that is not only affirmed, but affirmed necessarily, lest such a nonspatial being would be nonexistent.