🚨If HB291 is such a great deal, why does it require a state commission, a state treasury fund, state-appointed members, state bond purchases, and state-facilitated financing?
@NickSSantucci @matthuffman1 Why can’t the private parties involved simply do business directly? This arrangement has all the hallmarks of backroom cronyism.
🚨Look at the immense local friction we are already witnessing in Maineville/Mason (Warren County) regarding rapid labor migration shifts, suspicious commercial trucking setups, and serious federal smuggling investigations. If local residents are already deeply unsettled by these strains from ordinary migrants who are simply fleeing authoritarianism for economic survival. . imagine the intense social and political tension when our state leaders actively integrate an elite class of foreign personnel onto an un-elected public-private governance board, granting them unchecked influence over Ohio infrastructure solely for corporate profits and war manufacturing!
@OhioChamber @OhioDevelopment
🚨But let’s be clear: this isn't just about unvetted labor growth… this is a fundamental question of state sovereignty and fiscal responsibility. Look at what the corporate tech and AI boom acceleration has actually delivered for everyday Ohioans: higher utility bills, strained infrastructure, reduced quality water and air, austerity cuts, and now a new bill threatens Ohio farmers with eminent domain seizures before getting paid!! (Thanks
@ohiobrt 😡). We are already paying the price for corporate expansion.
🚨Now, under HB291, you want to rush through an international trade partnership that is highly asymmetrical. You are risking public taxpayer money and putting Ohioans on the hook to absorb 100% of the liability, all to fuel foreign private profits and war manufacturing. What are the exact terms of this partnership?
🚨Why is our state serving as a low-interest bank teller, staging ground, and risk-absorber? There are zero guardrails in this bill to protect local residents from being exploited. Ohioans are tired of funding shady, unvetted deals with zero ROI guarantees and zero public accountability.
⚠️Where are the guardrails for us? And what exactly do we gain?
CC:
@amyactonoh @DavidPepper @DonCKissick
@lbischoff @jake_zuckerman
HB291 is basically the HB188 framework rebuilt under a new wrapper.
HB188 named specific foreign partner nations. HB291 strips the country names . . but keeps the structure: a public-private commission with voting seats reserved for foreign-nation representatives.
Structure in brief:
4 Ohio “pro-trade” legislators (split between parties)
8 voting members tied to “designated member nations”
Those 8 are selected through a layered appointment Senate confirmation process, not direct election
Nonvoting seats include the Ohio Chamber of Commerce and state agencies with international trade roles (including Agriculture and department of development)
Bottom line: same model as HB188, just anonymized. . and still weighted 8 foreign-nation voting seats vs 4 elected state legislators.
Original version listed Israel, Japan, and Ireland, plus two unnamed countries.
My read is those likely map to UAE and India… based on Beigelman’s testimony emphasis on UAE and linked data center development activity (DAMAC/EDGNEX in Ohio) and India’s growing strategic alignment signals following recent high-level meetings involving Modi, Netanyahu, Vance, and Vivek.
Net effect: the country names may have been removed, but the implied partner set likely stayed intact… just less visible.