I used to use it out of habit and I stopped because unfortunately anything reclaimable is also co-optable and it is still very much used to demean and invalidate people

yall haven't even heard his larger point.. you are just mad he doesn't want to use euro nazi lingo or concepts to explain the situation. if you haven't seen.. all that "goy moi doi doi" shi has only made the movement co-optable by right wing idiots .. look at Lebanon.

Read more about how Optable helped Unity unlock brand demand: on.unity.com/OptableBlog

Yeah no. You are outside the circle of trust. MAGA is not co-optable for your fantasy project. You are as bad as a DeSantoid moron.

Teams can make better decisions quickly with agentic workflows backed by quality data. Partner insights from Optable digiday.com/form/why-the-tim…

Publishers who invest in agent readiness will be the ones buyer agents return to. Those who don't will be passed by. Partner insights from Optable digiday.com/form/why-the-tim…

Like I know "indie" has always had a nebulous co-optable meaning but I would have vehemently objected to the idea that the company that backed Outer Wilds, Stray, Sayonara Wild Hearts, and Cocoon is only doing industry plants. It is no longer that company

Capitalism is self-terminating, communism is co-optable by states (which degrade and produce capitalism) and the way forward for humanity can not be predicated on the state or capitalism, if humanity is to continue successfully.

Also evaluation of it too good wtf do you mean everyone getting average of 95 how are you they going to grade is in it like at 95 you get some BC grade and at 98 you get AA It's not that it's bad but yeah make it optable.

The Trade Desk、エージェンティック広告ツール「Koa Agents」をアルファ版でローンチ ① Koa Agentsの概要 ・The Trade Deskがエージェンティック広告の新ツール「Koa Agents」をアルファ版でローンチ ・キャンペーンのプランニング・バイイング・計測を自動化・効率化 ・バイヤーがキャンペーン目標とオーディエンス条件を入力するとAIエージェントがリアルタイムで最適化・運用 ② Stagwellとの提携 ・Stagwellが最初のパートナーとして採用。ベータ版は今夏に一部クライアントへ提供予定 ・Stagwellのオーディエンススコアリング・IDインフラとTTDのデータシグナルを統合 ・The Trade Deskの「Open Agentic Kit」を通じてプランニング〜アクティベーション〜計測まで一元管理 ③ Koaの進化 ・Koaは2018年に毎秒1,200万インプレッションを処理するAI最適化ツールとして誕生 ・現在は毎秒2,000万超のインプレッションを処理。より自律的なシステムへ進化 ・継続的にイテレーションを重ね、ルックアライクオーディエンス探索や成果ドライバーの説明も自動化 ④ エージェンティックAIとマーケターの関係 ・TTDのSVP of Engineering、Chandrasekharan氏：「AIはマーケターを代替しない」 ・ツール操作から"成果をディレクションする役割"へのシフトを強調 ・不完全なデータ入力はAIによってバイアスが増幅されるリスクがあると警鐘 ✅ コメント・注目すべき点 Koa Agentsで注目したいのは「Open Agentic Kit」という概念。これはMCPを通じてサードパーティのプラットフォーム（今回はStagwell）と統合する仕組みであり、TTDが単なるDSPではなく"エージェンティックな広告インフラ"としてのポジションを狙っていることがわかる。 エージェンティック広告インフラ競争において、TTDは今春のコンテキストプロトコル（MCP接続）発表に続き、今回のKoa Agentsでエージェント化を本格的に加速。AdCPを推進するPubMatic・Optable陣営とは対照的に、TTD自身がオープンキットを提供することでエコシステムの主導権を握ろうとしている点が戦略的。

many reasons. appreciate you asking! 1. PoS validation requires permissioned entry to the validator set 2. PoS coins cannot be rewarded permissionlessly from the network from hardware alone 3. PoS economics compound non-competitively and enable downstream risk via restaking (see Kelp DAO, Aave, LayerZero rsETH snafu just this past week) this creates a conflict of interest that PoW alleviates by having mining be a competitive process 4. PoS does not scale while maintaining decentralization due to signature aggregation and commitments taking additional bandwidth 5. PoS suffers from nothing at stake attacks which create no real choice when a chain has a contentious upgrade (yay we get coins on both networks) 6. PoS is more co-optable by the stablecoin supply that sits on its network (see USDC influence on Ethereum)

Lo elemental es subversivo, porque altera el bienestar emocional de quien se ampara en una ética que flota en un vacío ajeno a toda circunstancia. Por eso, en esta cuestión, rara es la tertulia donde se pone de manifiesto lo obvio: 1) "Prioridad nacional" es una redundancia. Si no la hay, no hay fronteras, ni estados, ni naciones. Puedes repudiarlo pero no puedes ignorarlo: no es una opción entre otras. 2) Derivado de 1), el Estado no es una organización con fines benéficos y ámbito universal de competencias. El principio de territorialidad del Derecho no es una imposición optable, que pueda sacrificarse de forma irrestricta en el altar de los derechos humanos. El Estado mismo, y con él, todo el ordenamiento jurídico, colapsarían. 1) y 2) pueden resumirse en el sempiterno conflicto entre ética y política. Lo hay porque se condicionan mutuamente. Pero argumentar como si las limitaciones políticas pudieran derogarse apelando a principios éticos es una falacia grosera. Sin embargo, hay un punto 3) de alcance sociológico, y aquí está también el escándalo que la progresía tertuliana omite: contemplan el partido desde los graderíos, como si se supieran protegidos y ajenos al conflicto de intereses en juego. Los problemas derivados de la inmigración y las regularizaciones no les alcanzan: pontifican porque están protegidos de ellos, su poder adquisitivo, su situación habitacional, se lo permiten. Y aquí no se da solo el fenómeno de las "luxury beliefs" acuñado por Rob Henderson. No es solo que ciertas creencias se las cuelguen como blasón de superioridad moral. Es que incluso, echando mano de un análisis típicamente marxista, se les podría acusar de pretender que las clases depauperadas, las más expuestas a los problemas causados por la inmigración promovida por los gobiernos, hicieran suyos los intereses de las oligarquías políticas, financieras y empresariales, que también están en juego en esto. Porque la nación política es también germen de desobediencia y resistencia organizada. La disolución de la nación política sólo da en la desorganización y obediencia de una masa amorfa. Sumado a la mano de obra barata, se entiende perfectamente lo que está en juego.

If you haven't been around during the early days of bitcoin, you'll be led to believe that decentralization was some polite academic debate or a marketing slogan handed down by VCs, regulators, or some investigator-turned-career-guy who got scammed and is now selling you “solutions.” No. It was forged in outright defiance. cypherpunks staring down state power and saying: "We will not ever comply." Satoshi built Bitcoin as a weapon against central banks: global uncensorable money no king or committee could seize. Early battles were about Silk Road raids and global bans that only hardened the network. Bitcoin would never ever have existed if not for those values right from the beginning. DPRK’s hacks today aren’t libertarian. they’re desperate totalitarians exposing fake 'defi': admin-key bridges, subpoenaed validators, and teams that fold under any pressure from Washington or Pyongyang. Centralized 'defi' is just fiat in disguise. @THORChain's survival proves the real thing: no CEO, no co-optable governance, no compliance theater, absolutely decentralised. It routes value permissionlessly, treating every state as irrelevant. That’s the libertarian dream in code. radical individual sovereignty. The state, any state is the enemy of free exchange. DPRK’s predation kills the fakes and strengthens the antifragile. Bitcoin never compromised, THORChain walks the same path. Decentralization isn’t a feature. It’s the only defense against tyranny. this is why we @monero , we @Zcash, we @Dashpay, we @Bitcoin, and we @THORChain .

Agentic advertising makes premium audiences more accessible to buyers, enabling faster responses with better data. Partner insights from Optable digiday.com/sponsored/as-pro…

They think Hasan's audience is potentially accessible and co-optable by them, and that talking heads like him are upstream of leftist illiberalism. A perfect storm of wrong assumptions.

Real Christianity has never been co-optable by - nor amenable to - either the right or the left. It is more conservative than the first, and more progressive than the second. That's what MAGA fundamentalists like @megbasham can't understand. See here: voegelinview.com/political-t…

Some parapolitics people do end up going after actors who are conceivably up to no good, but more and more they max out at Israel. This is where they become co-optable.

Traditional programmatic, the process of holding a 100-millisecond auction between the buyers and sellers of digital media, is wearing thin, but the infrastructure didn’t break overnight. Partner insights from Optable. buff.ly/8usEHH3

Milady is a trojan horse meme that stealthily propagates radical freedoms—speech, association, thought, information, and markets—through viral infection and self-reckoning, rendering it unco-optable and destined to normalize its insurgent values as inevitable background reality, much like crypto, PCs, and the internet