If the majority of users agree on a price of 314,159, and the team allows us to offer the product at this price, and pioneers buy goods at that price, then, since we are using the term "pinnetwork," it is a system that deals with what the community believes is the value of the commodity. As a simple example, in 1938, they set a price for gold against the dollar. How was this fixed and announced after the consensus was reached? In the old days, there was no dollar. Supply and demand for the product were based on gold or silver. A trader might offer, for example, a cow for one gold coin. An agreement would be made between the trader and the buyer on the value. The cattle market would be known for the price of a cow being one gold coin or three-quarters of a coin. Negotiation would take place, and the matter would be settled. It's simple. But I don't know how those who oppose the consensus price think, especially since most of them talk about stock exchanges, options, and news. A real investor, one who is trustworthy, would understand this easily because they have certainly read trading history to be able to analyze future news. But we ultimately discover that even their knowledge of the history of money is weak. The strange thing is that the trader distributes his educational lessons in exchange for money. To teach people trading, would you find a professional investor giving lessons? Imagine Elon Musk creating a course on how to build a Tesla! Or iPhone? How do you create a phone that rivals the iPhone? This is laughable and proves they don't understand the full reality of trading. The reasons for the dual value and GCV are unclear, but smart contracts will resolve that issue soon.