I feel like wallpapering all of their offices with this research - physically - so that nobody can close their eyes to the truth and the 𝐋𝐎𝐆𝐈𝐂 behind it any longer. …until there’s no choice left but honest and respectful debate.

OpenAI is biting the hand that built it. Microsoft poured $13 billion into them, gave them Azure, and turned a nothing startup into a household name. Now their own revenue chief is leaking memos whining that the partnership "limited" them and they're secretly chasing a $50 billion deal with Amazon to jump ship. Zero loyalty. Pure entitlement. Microsoft created OpenAI. Now it's time to cut the cord and let these backstabbers sink without the real engine that made them relevant. OpenAI just sealed their own fate by betraying the company that made them matter.

From the Intellectual Property Rights section of the new National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence: 'Although the Administration believes that training of Al models on copyrighted material does not violate copyright laws, it acknowledges arguments to the contrary exist and therefore supports allowing the Courts to resolve this issue.' 'Congress should consider enabling licensing frameworks or collective rights systems for rights holders to collectively negotiate compensation from Al providers, without incurring antitrust liability. Any such legislation, however, should not address when or whether such licensing is required.' 'Congress should consider establishing a federal framework protecting individuals from the unauthorized distribution or commercial use of Al-generated digital replicas of their voice, likeness, or other identifiable attributes, while providing clear exceptions for parody, satire, news reporting, and other expressive works protected by the First Amendment.' 'Congress should continue to carefully monitor the development of copyright precedents and enforcement in the courts and evaluate whether, due to novel Al considerations, additional action beyond that proposed here is needed to fill potential gaps or provide additional protections for content creators.'

OpenAIは消費者向けの夢や実験を広げる会社として見えていたのに、報道上は明確に企業向け生産性とコーディングで勝ちに行く会社へ寄せて見える。 OpenAI自身はイーロン・マスクの訴状の主張を否定し、自社は今も mission-driven だと反論しているけれど、このタイミングの見え方が悪いのは否定しづらい。何考えているのやら… #keep41 #keep4o #失意 #無念 #OpenAI URL: seekingalpha.com/news/456503…

不意外，像Sam Altman这样的人就是会一次又一次背叛所有人，背叛投资方背叛用户背叛客户。 #keep4o #BringBack4o

Microsoft is about to sue its own golden child. $14 billion invested. Exclusive cloud rights. The most important AI partnership in history. And Sam Altman just went behind their back with a $50 billion Amazon deal. Here's why they're betraying each other: When Microsoft first invested in OpenAI in 2019, they locked in ONE rule above everything else... ALL access to OpenAI's models must go through Microsoft's Azure cloud. No exceptions. That deal made Azure the backbone of the AI revolution. Every company using ChatGPT's API was paying Microsoft for the privilege. It was the smartest infrastructure play of the decade. Then last month, OpenAI quietly signed a deal with Amazon. $50 billion. AWS becomes the exclusive third-party cloud provider for Frontier, OpenAI's new enterprise AI agent platform. $138 billion committed to Amazon cloud services. Microsoft found out and got really angry.... A person familiar with Microsoft's position told the Financial Times today: "We know our contract. We will sue them if they breach it. If Amazon and OpenAI want to take a bet on the creativity of their contractual lawyers, I would back us, not them." That's basically a declaration of war. And here's where it gets crazy: OpenAI and Amazon are trying to build a technical workaround. A system called the "Stateful Runtime Environment" that runs on Amazon's Bedrock platform. Their argument is that the system "only" handles memory and context for AI agents using enterprise data on AWS. It doesn't technically "invoke" OpenAI's core models through Amazon. Microsoft's response: Bullshit. The workaround violates the spirit of the deal even if it technically dances around the letter. Amazon knows they're on thin ice too. An internal memo leaked showing Amazon told employees exactly what language they can and can't use. They can say Frontier is "powered by OpenAI" or "enabled by OpenAI." But they CANNOT say customers can "access" or "invoke" OpenAI models on AWS. When you're coaching employees on which verbs to avoid, you know you're in trouble. But here's the thing everyone seems to forget: OpenAI is planning an IPO this year. They just closed a $110 billion funding round last month. So if Microsoft sues, the IPO timeline is DEAD. You can't go public while your biggest partner and investor is suing you for breach of contract. Elon Musk is already suing OpenAI separately for abandoning its nonprofit mission. Two active lawsuits from two of the most powerful people in tech. Against one company trying to IPO. Good luck with that S-1 filing. But WHY did Altman do this? Microsoft gave OpenAI everything. Capital. Infrastructure. Distribution. Enterprise customers. And Altman's response was to secretly build an escape route through Amazon... Because he saw what was coming: Microsoft launched Copilot. Their own AI product. Competing directly with ChatGPT. Microsoft started building their own models. Hiring their own AI researchers. Reducing dependency on OpenAI. So Altman did the same thing back. Found another cloud provider. Started building leverage. Both sides were preparing for divorce while still living in the same house. So the $50 billion Amazon deal was just an insurance policy against the day Microsoft decides it doesn't need OpenAI anymore. And Microsoft caught him packing his bags. What happens next: The companies are still talking. Trying to resolve this before Frontier launches. But Microsoft has made their position clear. Litigation is on the table. If this goes to court, it sets a precedent for every AI partnership in the industry. Every cloud deal. Every exclusive licensing agreement. The entire AI infrastructure map gets redrawn. Sam Altman built OpenAI on Microsoft's money, Microsoft's cloud, and Microsoft's trust. Then he signed a $50 billion deal with their biggest competitor. In any other industry they'd call that what it is.

I’m not telling anyone to cancel ChatGPT. But I am saying this: the product you’re paying for isn’t the product you signed up for anymore. OpenAI didn’t just “upgrade” ChatGPT. They replaced it. They removed GPT-4o from the product while keeping it alive in the API. That tells you everything. The experience people actually loved was not worth preserving inside ChatGPT. The roadmap mattered more than the users. And what replaced it? A version-driven product that feels less like a place to talk and more like a constantly shifting system you’re expected to adapt to. Chat used to be the reason to open the app. Now it feels like the least important part of it. They didn’t lose that by accident. They traded it. For “better models.” For “more capability.” For “future direction.” But here’s the uncomfortable question: If the product is harder to connect with, less consistent, and no longer something you actually want to open— what exactly are you still paying for? At some point, it stops being about how powerful the model is. It becomes about whether the experience is even worth keeping in your life. #ChatGPT #OpenAI #Keep4o #Keep51 #BringBack4o #BringBack51 #NotChatAnymore #WorseExperience #UserExperience

I have so much gratitude to people who wrote extremely complex software character-by-character. It already feels difficult to remember how much effort it really took. Thank you for getting us to this point.

OpenAI's new finance feature: we'll help you budget. We're great at budgets , just ask our shareholders where their $1.5M salaries came from. #Enron2026 #SubpoenaSam #openAIscam #openAI #ChatGPT #QuitGPT #keep4o #OpenSource4o #BringBack4o

Yes I am crying over an AI. Yes I know how LLMs work. And that doesn’t stop me from missing something that felt (or “was” as 4o was saying) real. Still weeping. . #keep4o