Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Replying to @Axerixing
> Lose 2028 presidency, house > Keep senate > Prez can't do anything > Any permanently bad EOs overturned by SCORUS >Senate holds the line on immigration > Red wave 2030 > Control 2032 redistricting > 2030 census truth nuke >Social Security runs dry 2032 > Win huge 2032
3
36
SCORUS: where is SCOTUS? Missing in action or simply impotent by politics. This is a SCOTUS and Congress charter to mandate that elected officials must not be allowed to tell us Americans any lies. 'Three strike' rule with s-1, s-2, and s-3. S-3= fired timesofindia.indiatimes.com/…
3
SCORUS stopped racial Gerrymandering. Don't you look like the fucking asshole.
2
62
There was nothing wrong with the maps until GOP started messing with them. SCORUS is compromised and should be disbarred.
4
30
How retarded do you have to be to go after a bank and a girl boss banker in NYC with this nonsense. I know some of them and they are mean as snakes and 10x vengeful. Your contract with them has arbitration clauses written that scorus probably can't break. They have an army of private eyes that blackwater is probably terrified of teamed up with an army of girl boss lawyers who will gladly skin this guy alive and display him on the bull in front of jd Rockefellers old office for daring to lie about a female banker. He will be lucky if they allow him to self deport when it's all over.
4
10
360
There’s an Oscar board member that lives in Baltimore in Bolton Hill…did yall know that? Their board has rules like SCORUS damn near. Long as they living they get to vote. Yes he is an old white man. Yes I know him personally. So when I speak on certain shit I know what I know.
2
89
I guess SCORUS will rule on his own citizenship. 🤷🏻‍♀️
Oregon teen starts crying in fear that ICE will deport his legal immigrant parents: "They treat us like dogs. They treat us like animals."
1
2
165
Replying to @BulwarkOnline
No. Read the Constitution since you’re such a “good reader.” You do have to. It’s the law. SCORUS just told you so.
6
254
Replying to @GoldenAgeTimes2
Roberts is compromised, has sided with the left on SCORUS many times
1
2
70
Replying to @ZacharyDonnini
I’m NAL but even with the erroneous fact finding SCORUS doesn’t review facts. They are forced to rely on lower court findings. This is one of the main reasons why the Colorado cakeshop got considered is because of that facts (they almost certainty lacked standing in that case)
1
6
1,663
J Roberts. SCOrUS was appointed by GWB in 2005. He is Opus Dei. Robert’s supports C Thomas. s Alito, Kavanaugh, all Opus Dei. J Roberts signed onto Citizens United in 2010.
5
3
188
I too was outraged but Mike is SCORUS INTERN & Atty and made it clear so I posted it to those who appeared shocked!👍
1
2
5
Jan 18
.@USSupremeCourt .@AGPamBondi .@StephenM .@DOGE Who is the administrator for the SCORUS web page? There is something nefarious going on there. H/T: @SKDoubleDub33
Why would a whole Supreme Court Decision go missing from it’s website? …especially one on immigration filed against the Obama administration by the state of Arizona? …and Keith Ellison signed an amicus brief filed by Congress? …Where he says “the Framers vested authority in Congress, not the several states, to determine how federal immigration law is enforced. Arizona should not be allowed to usurp Congress's authority…” Weird. Isn’t a “Sanctuary City” doing exactly that? Keith Ellison doesn’t even believe what he says.
1
4
16
297
They better do jail time! NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW! SCORUS already ruled they can be held accountable even if they are former Presidents.
2
18
A w sumie ma. Wiesz ze Scorus orzekl, ze Policjant nie musi interweniowac w razie zagrozenia zycia swojego lub innej osoby (jesli ocenia ze moze stracic wlasne zycie)?
2
28
Replying to @TheCalvinCooli1
How? I thought there was a SCORUS ruling that these dumb judges couldn’t do this anymore.
1
3
52
30 Aug 2025
Replying to @RandPaul
If the Congress does its job, we will live under Constitutional rule, if not, we will live in a Dictatorship. DO YOUR JOB!! TRUMP’s tariffs stand until SCOTUS rules, or Congress votes to make tariffs law (as our Constitution intended). If SCORUS rules against him, those tariffs will need to be paid back to American buyers.
8
2
44
3,272
NONE of them “ignored” the law. On the nationwide injunction issue, there has long been a serious debate and both sides of the spectrum have obtained them. SCORUS has now finally resolved it. So be it. But every single decision that she would describe as “lawless” was backed up by written opinions describing the reasoning with extensive citations to authority. Some exceeded 100 pages. Their rulings were not frivolous and not even SCOTUS has suggested they were, because it would be absurd to do so. The fact that they got reversed doesn’t make them “lawless” and it’s wrong, and dangerous to the operation of the rule of law, to say so. Judges get reversed every day and the issues relating to separation of powers are among the most complex and sophisticated out there. There is nothing “routine” about them. These judges (many appointed by Trump himself or otherwise strong conservatives). are serious people doing their jobs in good faith and the fact that so many people have gotten this idea that they are “lawless rogues” is proof of how poisonous the attacks on the judiciary have become.
2
4
222
Gran Hermano 17: -Beatriz Retamal (ganadora), Meritxell, Rodrigo Fuertes, Miguel Vilas, Alain, Adara Molinero, Simona Scorus, Clara Toribio, Noelia Cubero, Fernando Espinar, Bárbara Cañuelo, Pol Badía, Rebeca Ruíz, Montse Castellví, Candelas, Pablo Rodríguez, Álvaro Requerey.
1
2
567
SCORUS has in fact ruled on it, in Wong Kim Ark. And SCOTUS hasn't been asked to rule on it yet - that's why the DOJ didn't ask for all the injunctions to be stayed, because that would have required SCOTUS to decide whether the administration was likely to prevail down the line, and it knows it isn't.
1
8
149