Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
I Will Fear No Evil retweeted
Replying to @JoeTippen
But @grok believes in TheScience! Remdesivir! And whatever CDC, WHO and Fauci said! Grok still believes ivermectin was not a treatment for Covid. Because BigPharma says so!
3
2
8
221
Replying to @OffGuardian0
Very true. Also valid is - a certain percentage will believe literally anything, however stupid, providing cross-promoting podcasters tell them it's true or tell them that the government or authorities or #TheScience is trying to hide it.
1
3
75
How #TheScience works
The year is 1949. The Nobel Prize in Medicine has just gone to the man who invented the lobotomy. Your doctor suggests one for your sister, who has not been herself since the baby came. It is the most celebrated advance in psychiatry of the age, and he is simply current. By the time the prize curdles into an embarrassment, close to twenty thousand Americans have had the operation, and proportionally more here in Britain. The year is 1956. Lay the baby down on his front, the doctor says. So does the most trusted childcare book ever written, the one on every new mother's shelf. On his back he might choke, the reasoning goes. Millions obey. The advice holds for nearly thirty years, long after the evidence has quietly turned, and a generation of cot deaths is counted before anyone thinks to roll the babies over. The year is 1966. A bestselling book informs your wife that menopause is a disease, that she is, in the author's word, a castrate, and that a small daily pill will keep her youthful and tolerable to live with. Her doctor agrees. The drug becomes one of the most prescribed in the country. Nobody mentions that the author sat on the payroll of the company that made it. That detail surfaces decades later, in the same year the landmark trial is halted early for raising rates of breast cancer, stroke and clots. The year is 1979. Your ulcer is caused by stress and sharp food, the doctor explains. Calm down, drink milk, take the antacid that happens to be the best-selling medicine on earth. Two Australians are about to prove that most ulcers are caused by a bacterium and cured by a fortnight of antibiotics. The profession laughs. One of them eventually drinks a beaker of the stuff to settle the matter. The establishment takes the better part of twenty years to stop laughing. The Nobel lands in 2005. The year is 1985. Butter is dangerous, the doctor says. Switch to margarine, it is modern, it is heart-healthy, the experts are united. The spread he nudges you toward is loaded with trans fats, which the next decade will identify as the genuinely dangerous one, and which will eventually be banned outright. The butter goes quietly back in the fridge. No correction is ever printed at the volume of the original warning. The year is 1992. There is a pyramid on the surgery wall, and the very same one in your grandchild's classroom. Bread, cereal, rice and pasta form the broad virtuous base, up to eleven servings a day. Fat is exiled to the tiny tip. The chart was reportedly held back a year while the relevant industries had their say. It is wrong at the bottom and wrong at the top. Now it is today. Your doctor has new guidelines, new studies, a fresh consensus, delivered with precisely the steady confidence of every guideline above. He believes it, and he has good reason to. So did every doctor in this thread. None of them were villains. Each was sincere, most were kind, and all were certain, reading from a map that somebody else had drawn and handed them. That is the part worth sitting with. So when the man in the white coat tells you what to eat, what to fear, and what to swallow every morning for the rest of your life, you are allowed to ask. Who paid for the study. What the evidence says beneath the headline. What he was just as certain about thirty years ago, and where that advice sits now. Then make up your own mind. Call it scepticism, or call it whatever your grandmother called it when she ignored the advert, kept the butter where it was, and lived to ninety-one. It has outlasted every consensus on this list. It will outlast this one too.
35
Replying to @simonmaechling
"Safe and effective", Trust TheScience™️ . What did DDT do for us? John Darsee. Tuskegee. Thalidomide. Eugenics. Leaded gasoline. Smoking endorsement by doctors. Can you think of others? Roundup resistant crops? Long term studies say? You degenerates sacrificed decades of trust for expedient lies. Reap the whirlwind mercenaries.
7
Replying to @DrCHuber
But I’m sure @grok will persist that all vaccines are safe and effective! And the HPV prevents cancer! Because BigPharma bought and paid for TheScience says so!
1
70
Andy retweeted
And when the same people keep citing each other, reviewing each other’s work, interviewing each other, and calling it “the science,” forgive me for wondering if we’ve wandered into an echo chamber with a DOI number.
1
4
211
Replying to @Yash25571056
Yes!!!! Hiroshi, you should be nominated for Nobel prize for medicine! Your Twitter account has saved the lives of millions!!! #TheScience #FaceMask #LongCovid
1
1
60
Or they'll say that we must support Israel because Ashkenazis are closer genetically to us than Palestinians. These kinds of arguments seem to come from them trying to be "objective" and follow TheScience™️, but they just show how important it is for us to be ideological 2/2
3
25
#Ireland2026 Where people who question #thescience a vilified #covid #genderideology
A GP and former member of the Medical Council has been found guilty of professional misconduct over his posts on social media during the pandemic, which were highly critical of Covid-19 vaccines and public health guidelines rte.ie/news/health/2026/0604…
2
47
Did you show the appendiphoriphobic doctor the appendiphoria equivalent of TheScience™️?
2
65
Replying to @reddit_lies
Why do the doctors not use TheScience™️ to determine who is "really" trans before performing these life saving procedures?
3
19
725
Replying to @welt
Schon ulkig, dass bei Energie auf einmal wieder Meinung reicht, wenn bei Klimasimulationen alle den Fakten von "TheScience" hinterher beten.
7
69
Replying to @WIRED
My impression of Wired is that it's staffed by a bunch of TheScience™ bros doing their level best to out-Conover Adam Conover.
1
3
56
Lipscomb do I have some bad news for yall buddy #TheScience
FINAL | No. 4 Texas Tech 8, No. 20 Mississippi State 0 #HailState
2
82
Was ist denn für TheScience normal? Dass man Szenarien einstöpselt und Panik ³ schürt, und wenn alle vor Angst nicht mehr laufen können, stöpselt man das Szenario wieder aus und sagt, sorry, auch die Wissenschaft kann irren? Und züchtet den nächsten Popanz.
2
30
464
Ich sollte ergänzen, dass so etwas in TheScience normal sei. 🤣
3
5
137
2,737