Dear Gleb,
Will the Blum trading bot be reactivated? The Blum trading bot was very useful for me, and I won first place in the volume competition organized by Blum Türkiye last year.
3
23h
📈 Ganadores de hoy en la categoría #SmartContract (15-06-2026)
Union $U 74. 36%
(@UTechStables)
heyAura $ADX 26.48%
(@heyaura)
Stellar $XLM 21.35%
(@StellarOrg)
Æternity $AE 15.05%
(@aeternity)
Oasis $ROSE 14.16%
(@OasisProtocol)
📉 Perdedores de hoy
TAC Protocol $TAC -7.88%
(@TacBuild)
Velvet $VELVET -7.06%
(@velvet_capital)
KaiChain $KAI -5.33%
(@KardiaChain)
Particle Network $PARTI -3.76%
(@ParticleNtwrk)
Coinweb $CWEB -3.68%
(@coinwebofficial)
1
1
96
Liongang retweeted
Jun 10
As mentioned in reopening announcement, here is the full context behind the deliberate decision that resulted in 316 duplicate transactions reaching a few hundred users on TON.
When the bridge was drained during the May 11 incident, a number of legitimate cross-chain transactions initiated by users were left in limbo: processed on the TAC side, but never settled on TON because the TON Adapter no longer held the funds to complete them.
Ahead of the relaunch, we faced a clear choice on how to handle these pending transactions.
The first option was to hard-fork TAC: coordinating with validators and partners, re-issuing tokens to mirror a snapshot of the previous state, and a number of operations that break the immutability of the TAC blockchain. Immutability is a core property of any serious chain, and we will not compromise it to patch an operational issue, however convenient that shortcut would have been.
The second option was to let the TON Adapter process these pending transactions through its normal flow once the bridge was live. This preserved chain soundness and immutability. The trade-off: 316 transactions reprocessed on TON, delivering approximately $80,000 to users who were not meant to receive them.
We chose immutability.
If you received an unexpected transaction in any of these assets: TAC, USDT, BLUM, tsTON, Re7 USDTv2, Re7 cbBTCv2, Re7 WETHv2, mRe7YIELD, cbBTC, syUSDT - kindly return the funds back to the TAC team multisig on TON: UQAkTfPo4zo72Zyr5dk1QrWvCWlgA0gRd3njyg5hqmwdrQrI
We appreciate your cooperation.
Jun 10
We're happy to share that cross-chain transactions between TON and TAC are now available again.
The patched sequencer software has been independently reviewed by our auditor and TON ecosystem partners and we can resume operations with complete confidence. TAC CCL is now safer than ever.
All missing funds in USDT, BLUM, and tsTON have been restored. Users can use TAC-powered products (DeFi Wallet vaults, Acid ID staking feature, and others) as before. Affected users expecting transactions on TON in BLUM or USDT will receive their funds automatically - no action is required from their side.
❗️Important Notice: As part of the relaunch, a necessary step resulted in some users receiving more tokens than expected.
More details to follow in a post later today.
Thank you for your support, patience and trust.
4
22
10,079
Liongang retweeted
Jun 10
We're happy to share that cross-chain transactions between TON and TAC are now available again.
The patched sequencer software has been independently reviewed by our auditor and TON ecosystem partners and we can resume operations with complete confidence. TAC CCL is now safer than ever.
All missing funds in USDT, BLUM, and tsTON have been restored. Users can use TAC-powered products (DeFi Wallet vaults, Acid ID staking feature, and others) as before. Affected users expecting transactions on TON in BLUM or USDT will receive their funds automatically - no action is required from their side.
❗️Important Notice: As part of the relaunch, a necessary step resulted in some users receiving more tokens than expected.
More details to follow in a post later today.
Thank you for your support, patience and trust.
8
3
34
12,228
Jun 10
2
68
May 30
Quick heads up for sUSN/USN holders on @TacBuild
@eulerfinance has deprecated its TAC instance. Funds are safe and fully withdrawable from the Euler's dApp, but TAC is now hidden under "Deprecated chains."
Here's how to withdraw your position, step by step 🧵
22
3
37
814
Any MCP-compatible agent can now explore, create, and manage positions on @CarbonDeFixyz.
25 tools.
5 chains: @ethereum, @SeiNetwork, @Celo, @COTInetwork, and @TacBuild.
All through plain language using the new Carbon DeFi MCP Server → mcp.carbondefi.xyz.
Based on the user's intent, the agent determines which of the 6 strategy types to create:
🔸 Limit Order – pre-set a trade to buy or sell at a single fixed price.
No expiry. Executes partially or in full. 100% price certainty.
🔸 Range Order – buy or sell within a custom price range.
Designed for gradual accumulation (scaling in) or distribution (scaling out).
🔸 Recurring Strategy – buy and sell ranges are defined independently and linked together, creating a repeating buy low, sell high strategy with custom spread.
🔸 Concentrated Liquidity – buy and sell within a custom price range with no tick constraints and a custom, auto-compounding fee tier/spread.
🔸 Full Range Liquidity – covers up to 1000x from current market price.
🔸 Swap – trade as a taker against Carbon DeFi liquidity.
blog.bancor.network/create-a…
2
7
28
958
May 26
@Bancor is voting to let its automated token-selling system - The Vortex - clear far bigger batches on two newer chains it supports, @TacBuild and @iota.
The Vortex is an auction that sells tokens the protocol collects from fees, then routes the proceeds back to Ethereum mainnet. Today it can only sell 100 tokens at a time before resetting the auction price.
The TAC pool has built up over 2.8 million $TAC, the IOTA pool over 20,000 $IOTA. At 100 per batch, that backlog never clears.
The proposal raises the per-batch cap 1,000x to 100,000 on both chains. "Selling these in batches of 100 and then resetting the auction price does not make sense."
3 wallets have voted so far, 82,031 in favor and none against. Voting closes May 27th at 5pm UTC.
Proposal: snapshot.box/#/s:bancornetwo…
8
15
882
May 22
NodePay
Walletconnect
TACBuild
Sentient
May 22
projects that gave me easy-decent unexpected money:
- Sign
- Sosovalue
- TacBuild
- Mira network
what about you?
6
2
10
143
May 22
projects that gave me easy-decent unexpected money:
- Sign
- Sosovalue
- TacBuild
- Mira network
what about you?
May 21
i think people remember Bitcoin Pizza Day for the wrong reason.
every year people calculate what 10,000 BTC would be worth today.
but that trade was never a mistake,
it was proof that crypto could be used for something real.
before that purchase, Bitcoin was mostly an experiment shared among a small group of believers.
after it, people could finally see what digital money might become.
16 years later, the difference is incredible.
back then, crypto bought pizza,
people can now access everything from stock futures and commodities to precious metals and pre-IPO opportunities through the same ecosystem.
a good example is $SPACEX (PRE) on @MEXC.
for years, exposure to companies like SpaceX before a public listing was usually limited to private networks, institutions, and well connected investors.
through MEXC, everyday users could access that narrative at a $650 entry price.
in fact, subscribers were already up more than 20% before listing.
and it is not happening in isolation.
MEXC reported a 246% increase in TradFi trading volume during Q1,
showing growing interest in markets beyond crypto alone.
to me, that’s the real Pizza Day story.
not what 10,000 BTC could be worth today, but how much access it can create today.
the first bitcoin transaction proved crypto could buy something.
today, platforms like MEXC are proving it can unlock far more than that.
#BitcoinPizzaDay #MEXC
22
1
33
785
May 20
Respect for the transparency.
Bridge bugs are brutal, but making users whole, publishing the RCA, and not rushing the restart is the right move.
Painful lesson for everyone building on TON: trust the code, verify the jettons.
3
257
May 20
Yeah i was surprised as well to realize how complex is the work behind the scene with a foundation, a lab entity, lawyers and authorities.
4
74