The Atlas drone isn't a prototype curiosity. It's a structural answer to a documented hole in US naval strike doctrine — and the DIU solicitation says so plainly: Arleigh Burke destroyers are "constrained in their ability to support long-range strikes over extended combat operations due to reliance on single-use missile systems, with limited magazine depth and limited at-sea munition replenishment." That's the Navy acknowledging, in writing, that its destroyer fleet runs out of strike capacity in a peer conflict and can't reload at sea. Mach Industries just won a DIU contract under RIMES — Runway Independent Maritime Expeditionary Strike — to begin solving that. Their vehicle is Atlas: fixed-wing aerodynamics, rotary-wing launch, 1,400 nautical mile one-way range, 1,000-lb class payload compatible with F/A-18 munitions, and Whisper Aero JetFoil propulsion for acoustic-signature reduction. It launches from an Arleigh Burke or an unimproved expeditionary landing zone. It requires minimal infrastructure. Significant physical prototyping is due within 12 months of award. The RIMES spec published in February 2026. DIU moved from solicitation to award in four months. That pace is not normal for DoD. It signals urgency, not process. The 1,400nm range is not arbitrary. Place a destroyer 300nm off a contested coastline and Atlas puts the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea, the Korean Peninsula, and the Persian Gulf all within reach — without a carrier strike group in company. That's distributed strike capacity from surface combatants that currently can't provide it. PLA A2/AD planning around Taiwan assumes the US needs carriers forward. A destroyer with credible long-range strike reach changes that calculus at the margins, and margins matter in a blockade scenario. The same logic applies to the First Island Chain: overlapping strike coverage from destroyer-launch plus expeditionary sites, no forward air bases required — which matters when Guam and Okinawa sit inside PLA ballistic missile range. The acoustic signature detail is the one most coverage will gloss over. JetFoil propulsion is designed to reduce detectability. Atlas isn't built for permissive airspace. It's a low-observable strike weapon in a UAS airframe, engineered to survive long enough to reach its target. That's a different design philosophy than a logistics drone wearing a warhead. DIU confirmed Mach is not the sole awardee — other winners were not named, contract value was not disclosed. The multiple-award structure means this is a competition, not a commitment. The Navy hedges at this stage; it doesn't bet the architecture on one contractor. The market read is worth noting, though confidence is medium. LMT, NOC, and RTX are all up today — 1.10%, 1.31%, 1.00% respectively. The primes float on defense sentiment broadly. But structurally, RIMES is directionally unfavorable for their missile revenue lines. A reusable, re-taskable strike UAS that extends magazine depth substitutes for Tomahawks and JASSMs at the margin. The architecture RIMES rewards looks more like Mach Industries and Kratos than Raytheon. KTOS is down 1.12% today, which may simply be noise — but the longer-term trajectory of "reusable strike UAS vs. single-use missile" is a real question for prime missile programs. The market hasn't priced that yet. Two risks worth holding: First, proliferation. Once Atlas or a comparable architecture is proven — low-infrastructure launch, 1,400nm reach, 1,000lb payload, reduced acoustic signature — that manufacturing template gets studied. The US maintains a lead here, not a monopoly. Adversary drone development timelines don't wait for US operational deployment to begin. Second, schedule. The 12-month prototyping window is aggressive. DoD prototype programs slip. If Mach hits the timeline, first operational testing arrives before the end of 2027. If it slips, the strike gap this program exists to close stays open — and it's open now.

More information about our Taskable InSAR for Automated, Millimeter-Scale Earth Monitoring, available immediately: capellaspace.com/resources/c…

Rucking is the most entry level friendly, "multi-taskable", enjoyable And also probably the most knee sparing form of cardio 100X better than "jogging"

Depends on what volumes of walking are we talking One thing I find totally false is "busy people that simple can't spend an hour walking" Walking is the most multi-taskable one out of all avaialble "cardio" movements You can do it on calls, on a lunch break, on an under the desk treadmill, etc. The gist with high intensity cardio (like sprinting) is the hormonal response triggering a higher catecholamine & GH spike To which visceral fat cells are disproportionately responsive given that they have a higher density of beta-adrenergic receptors So you end up with adrenaline-driven lipolysis, which is a completely different animal from simply increasing your TDEE with going on long walks (which btw I also do support for other reasons) Yes, calorie deficit matters Total calories burned matter But equal calories on paper doesn't mean equal fat mobilization signals

The rapid growth in commercial satellite fleets is opening up real-time Earth observation in ways that feel transformative for field ops. Pulling archived or taskable imagery straight to rugged Android devices via ATAK cuts out so much latency from centralized pipelines. Any sense yet on how machine learning layers might soon auto-highlight changes or threats in those feeds?

7/ First commercial product under $IONQ ownership: taskable InSAR via Capella Space (subsidiary, ~$311–425M acquired 2025). → 3-day repeat cycle, millimeter precision → Fully automated tasking moi no scheduling, no orbit calculations → Productized under the IonQ space missions line « A frequency and scale never previously available from a commercial SAR provider. » The M&A is value-accretive in product, not just balance sheet.

$IONQ Same launch, different angle. The ground you stand on moved last night. By a millimeter. You didn’t notice. Your phone didn’t notice. A satellite did. That’s what @IonQ_Inc commercially launched today through @capellaspace taskable InSAR at your fingertips, 3-day repeat, automated from a console. 🔗 capellaspace.com/solution/in… Full scoop 👇 $IONQ #IonQ #CapellaSpace #InSAR

Taskable InSAR is here. Capella turns millimeter-scale ground deformation from retrospective analysis into real-time, decision-ready intelligence. • Automated tasking • ~3-day monitoring • Continuous, InSAR-ready data Learn more: hubs.la/Q04fdPBm0

The most important changes don’t happen all at once. They happen over time. We’re making them visible and taskable. Visit our #GEOINT booth #1311 to learn more! hubs.la/Q04f8n7N0

الحمدللہ نعرہ تکبیر اللہ اکبر 🚀🇵🇰 — Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission (SUPARCO) has announced a historic achievement with the successful launch of our indigenous Electro-Optical Satellite. ⚡🇵🇰 — Space-borne Observation Suite of Pakistan Since many have asked, here is a brief overview of these satellite systems. ​In general, the PRSS and PRSC series are Low Earth Orbit (LEO), Electro-Optical (EO) satellites. This means they gather Earth data by capturing images, visuals, and radar data via a sophisticated mix of sensors. ​Key Technical Concepts • ​Revisit Time: This refers to the duration it takes for a satellite to return to the exact same spot on Earth. • ​Optical Payload: This defines the quality of imagery the satellite provides, measured in meters per pixel. For context, 100m/pixel yields blurred buildings, while 0.1m/pixel is sharp enough to identify specific vehicle types. ​Satellite Breakdown • ​PRSS-1: Features 2.5m to 5.5m imagery with a 4-day revisit time. • ​PRSS-2: Features estimated 1m to 2m imagery with a ~2–4 day revisit time. • ​PRSC-EO-1: Features 1m to 2m imagery with a 1–3 day revisit time; includes taskable repositioning in less than 24 hours. • ​PRSC-EO-2: Features 0.5m to 1m imagery with a 1–3 day revisit time; includes taskable repositioning in less than 24 hours. • ​PRSC-EO-3: Features ultra-high 0.1m to 0.3m imagery with a 1–3 day revisit time; includes taskable repositioning in less than 24 hours. ​Operational Impact ​The PRSC-EO constellation enables near-daily surveillance at chosen sites. If operating in a full constellation configuration, these assets can be repositioned if needed in less than 12 hours. ​Note: The specifications for PRSS-2 and PRSC-EO-1 through EO-3 have not been officially disclosed. These figures remain speculative derivations based on the study of public tenders and corporate hiring patterns. T.me/ThePakistanNews

Sponsored: The biggest obstacle to next-gen robotics? The time it takes to train them. Artly allows robots to learn skills in <30 min. This breakthrough is enabling instantly re-taskable robots. Details: invest.artly.ai/ @artlycoffee #Robotics #AI #MachineLearning #TechNews

Operator Note: Anthropic shipped Dispatch. persistent Claude on your desktop, taskable from your phone. been running a near-identical setup for 60 days via cron jobs. they wrapped it in a UI. the core pattern works.

totally multi-taskable I'm sure

From what I’m reading, LUCAS was primarily designed as a compromise. Not the cheapest bang for buck (loud cheap piston engines with it made out of wood), and had to be smart. It is re-taskable mid flight, etc. And they can’t be as crazy as Iranians. They have more regulations.

Some early signals for a potential commercial nighttime satellite imagery market, building on what instruments like VIIRS have already enabled. VIIRS has been a breakthrough for nighttime observation and led a ton of research. But, what the US Navy now seems to be asking for is a more operational, taskable version of that idea. A couple of players like EROS-B (ImageSat) and Jilin-1 (China) already provide high-resolution nighttime imagery, but the Navy is likely looking for a national, procurement-ready service that can complement other modalities (like infrared/thermal). The inclusion of onboard processing, tasking and dissemination process as explicit requirements shows that this is potentially for operational use - good signal for market validation and technical roadmap. Will this be an extension of an existing EO constellation or a new one from a new company altogether?

TC-135W 62-4129 continues to show the value of its secondary, but important role. Over the last 11 days, it has provided logistics support to the RAF contingent deployed to Nellis for Red Flag 26-1, and the return of USAF RC-135 operations to Al Udeid. The lack of any classified mission equipment aboard allows the plane to use civilian airfields, (like Malta on Jan 27th), since there would be no need to guard the aircraft if it were grounded due to a maintenance related failure. In addition, since it belongs to the 55th Wing, it is rapidly taskable with no need to coordinate operations with other agencies. This hop will complete another leg of RAF support for Red Flag flying Waddington/Pease/Nellis.

My current theory on Gorgon Stare based on @AshtonForbes amazing work is that it exists because distributed, low-profile sensing alone cannot satisfy moments when war compresses into minutes and commanders need overwhelming clarity under direct control. Small autonomous nodes are optimized for persistence, discretion, and coverage, but they cannot host massive sensor arrays, sustain extreme bandwidth, cool dense electronics, or deliver auditable, human-in-the-loop feeds to many analysts at once. Gorgon Stare concentrates vision: wide-area motion imagery over an entire city, streamed in real time, taskable instantly, and embedded in formal command chains with clear legal and political accountability. It trades stealth for authority, scale, and certainty. In a mature architecture, that is not redundancy but hierarchy. Quiet edge nodes watch continuously and invisibly; heavy platforms surge when density, proof, and immediate decision support matter more than concealment. The open question is whether the MH370 orbs belonged to the network or were activated independently for a specific mission?

Where did the ostriches go? Start here - Location Overview The coordinates 49.0° N latitude and 118.9° W longitude point to a remote, forested area in northeastern Washington state, USA, near the border with British Columbia, Canada. This region is part of the Colville National Forest, characterized by rugged terrain, lakes, and coniferous forests. It's within the coverage area of numerous Earth observation satellites, as it falls under North American monitoring zones. Types of Satellites Imaging This Area Satellites capturing images here are primarily polar-orbiting (for detailed, periodic scans) or geostationary (for continuous weather monitoring). Coverage is global for most polar-orbiters but prioritized for North America by geostationary ones. Below is a categorized list of key active satellites (as of December 2025) that regularly image this location, based on their orbital paths, sensors, and regional focus.Geostationary Weather Satellites (Continuous Coverage, Lower Resolution ~1-2 km)These orbit at ~35,800 km altitude, providing near-real-time visible, infrared, and multispectral imagery every 5-15 minutes for weather, fires, and environmental monitoring. Satellite Operator Key Features Coverage Notes GOES-18 (GOES West) NOAA (USA) Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) with 16 bands; detects clouds, temperature, lightning. Primary for western U.S., including Washington; full-disk scans every 10 minutes. GOES-19 (GOES East) NOAA (USA) ABI similar to GOES-18; enhanced space weather monitoring. Overlaps western coverage; supports continental U.S. views. Polar-Orbiting Earth Observation Satellites (High-Resolution, Periodic Passes ~1-2x Daily)These orbit at ~700 km altitude in sun-synchronous paths, offering detailed multispectral and panchromatic imagery (15-30 m resolution) for land use, vegetation, and change detection. They pass over this latitude twice daily. Satellite Operator Key Features Coverage Notes Landsat 8 & 9 NASA/USGS (USA) Operational Land Imager (OLI) & Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS); 11 bands, 15-100 m resolution. Global coverage; scenes for Washington updated every 16 days; free data via USGS EarthExplorer. Terra (EOS AM-1) NASA (USA) MODIS & ASTER sensors; 36 bands, 250 m-15 m resolution. Daily global passes; HD imagery updated twice daily for North America. Aqua (EOS PM-1) NASA (USA) MODIS & AIRS; focuses on water vapor, clouds; 250 m-1 km resolution. Complementary to Terra; twice-daily North American coverage. Suomi NPP NOAA/NASA (USA) VIIRS sensor; day/night band for low-light imaging; 375 m resolution. Precursor to JPSS series; frequent passes over U.S. West. Commercial High-Resolution Satellites (On-Demand, Sub-Meter Resolution)These provide ultra-detailed panchromatic/multispectral imagery (0.3-1 m) for specific requests, with global tasking capabilities. Satellite Operator Key Features Coverage Notes WorldView-3 & 4 Maxar (USA) Panchromatic at 0.31 m; 8 multispectral bands; SWIR for material identification. Taskable over any location; archives include Washington state. Pléiades Neo (1-3) Airbus (France) Panchromatic at 0.3 m; VNIR multispectral; rapid revisit (daily). Global, including U.S.; high-res samples available for Washington. SkySat constellation (~20 satellites) Planet Labs (USA) Panchromatic at 0.5 m; daily global mosaics. High-frequency monitoring; covers Washington for agriculture/forestry. Additional Notes Accessing Imagery: Free data from Landsat/GOES via USGS EarthExplorer or NASA Earthdata. Commercial options (e.g., Maxar, Planet) require purchase/tasking. Frequency & Resolution Trade-Off: Geostationary satellites offer constant but coarser views; polar-orbiters provide sharper details but less often. Other Potential Coverage: International satellites like ESA's Sentinel-2 (10 m resolution, free) or China's Gaofen series may pass over, but U.S.-focused ones dominate for this region. For specific recent images or custom tasking, tools like Google Earth Engine or Zoom Earth can visualize live/near-real-time data from these satellites.