Gilles, je vais démonter ta prémisse de départ, parce que tout le reste de ton argument s'effondre avec elle. Tu pars du principe qu'il faut une « sensibilité de gauche » pour ne pas laisser créver les gens de faim. C'est l'inverse total de ce que dit l'histoire économique des 50 dernières années. Les chiffres bruts. 1990 : 2,3 milliards de personnes en pauvreté extrême. 38% de l'humanité. 2025 : 831 millions. Environ 10%. 1,5 milliard d'êtres humains sortis de la misère absolue en 35 ans. La plus grande réduction de souffrance humaine de toute l'histoire de l'espèce. Qui a fait ça ? Pas l'aide internationale. Pas les ONG. Pas les programmes de redistribution. Pas la « sensibilité de gauche ». Le marché. L'ouverture commerciale. La Chine de Deng en 1978 qui abandonne le maoisme. L'Inde en 1991 qui libéralise. Le Vietnam, l'Indonésie, le Bangladesh qui s'ouvrent au capitalisme. Les seuls endroits où l'extrême pauvreté a EXPLOSÉ sur la même période ? Le Vénézuela socialiste : de 27% de pauvres en 2008 à plus de 80% en 2018, avec une inflation de 130 000% et un Vénézuélien moyen qui a perdu 11 kilos par dénutrition. La Corée du Nord. Cuba. Le Zimbabwe de Mugabe. La gauche ne nourrit pas les pauvres. Elle les fabrique. Le capitalisme produit tellement de richesse que même ses « perdants » américains vivent mieux que la classe moyenne soviétique. Un pauvre US a un frigo, une voiture, un téléphone, l'air conditionné, internet. Un pauvre cubain attend du riz. Ton argument selon lequel « le social aux USA est un désastre » repète une légende française. La réalité : le PIB par habitant américain est de 80 000$. Français : 45 000$. Un Mississippien — l'État US le plus pauvre — a un revenu médian supérieur au Français moyen. La vérité que la gauche française refuse de regarder : dans un système libéral, il y a plus de richesse créée, plus largement distribuée, et beaucoup moins de pauvres. Partout. Sans exception. Sur toutes les périodes mesurées. ÊTRE de gauche en 2026 face à ces données, ce n'est pas avoir de la « sensibilité ». C'est ignorer 35 ans de preuves accablantes. C'est préférer la posture morale au résultat. La compassion sans résultats, ça s'appelle de la vanité.

“This is ideology verses reality. For anybody who is against me I want them to imagine an ideology enshrined in law that they don’t agree with & then they’re punished for not going along with it. That’s the situation I’m in & why I advocate for reality in law.”

If you have to create a shared podium for the boy competing in the girls’ event, you’ve already admitted you know he isn’t a girl and that his participation is unfair. At that point, you're just seeking a public humiliation ritual for the girls.

As we approach the Giggle v Tickle decision, I’m remembering that • I received an Australian Human Rights Commission complain citing “gender identity discrimination” when I was 14/15 weeks pregnant. • The AHRC was, imo, never neutral. It was gender ideology capture from the very beginning. While they were talking about “assigned sex at birth” and “lived experience”, I was 20 weeks pregnant & found out I was having a girl. • To settle the complaint in the AHRC - and not have it escalate to federal court - I had to • agree to let him on the woman only social networking app I created • a let all men who claim to be women on the app • apologize • attend “sex & gender education classes • pay $20,000 • moderate all content on the woman only platform so men who claim to be women weren’t offended by it. • The AHRC never meaningfully entertained my argument that woman only spaces were lawful. I always felt that their stance was, “you’re guilty, admit it, accept it.” • While contemplating the magnitude of what I had to do, I thought about my daughter & that I would eventually be teaching her to stand up for herself & do what is right. How could I do that if I ran away when something seemed too hard? • I said “NO” to what the AHRC was offering. Tickle filed in federal court 60 days later and “Tickle v Giggle” began. • A federal court case full appeal & my daughter is about to turn 4 years old. Giggle v Tickle has been in the background of her whole life. Any time the case has been incredibly stressful - and there have been many times, I was losing my hair at one point - I have just focused on my daughter & it instantly became easier. I want her to have rights & will do everything I can to ensure that she does. • I want every woman & girl to be able to say “NO” to a man, no matter how he identifies, and not be punished for it. • At no point in the past 4.5 years have I been even remotely convinced that men can be women. Not once. In fact, I’m more sure than ever that they’re not. • Thank you everyone for the support. It would be impossible to have this fight without it. gigglecrowdfund.com 🩷

One of the worst parts of COVID was watching Americans surrender their God-given freedoms to bureaucrats who were wrong about everything.

🚨 LMAO! Speaker Johnson just MIC DROPPED Democrats whining over SCOTUS abolishing race-based gerrymandering "We find it amusing Democrats are suddenly concerned about 'fair congressional representation.'" "I challenge those Democrats to raise those concerns with the GOP congressman from Massachusetts, Connecticut, or Rhode Island." "They'll have a hard time doing that, of course, because Democrats have gerrymandered Republicans completely out of those states." 🫳🏻🎤 @SpeakerJohnson

5 girls who should have just been able to focus on competing in CIF track & field prelims Instead they had to speak out before competing asking for leaders to Protect Girls’ Sports A male took 1st in girls’ long, high, & triple jump today. I am so proud of these ladies 💗

The Right to Religious Exemption to Vaccination Upheld in Court, according to the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons "The religious exemption to vaccination has emerged as the strongest legal response to ever-increasing vaccine mandates at hospitals, schools, military service, and even ordinary employment. In many ways these vaccine mandates have worsened. Multiple States are taking a hard line against religious exemptions from vaccination, and four States, California, New York, Connecticut, and Maine—prohibit any religious exemption from vaccines. Hospitals, which had already become islands of tyranny, are imposing mandates for what used to be voluntary vaccines, such as seasonal influenza." @acsJACS