I like your summaries. When I complete and submit a patent application on my energy doodad I'll be able to publish and share a few bits and bobs so folks can pick it apart for all its flaws, compare it to existing energy systems for its materials and methods for manufacture and performance, as well as the environmental impact. Be as thorough as you can. It's based on well-known science principles so you won't need a degree in any specialised field to understand it.
It's a method or methods more so than any single gizmo but there are gizmos that may present as much better than wind and solar for output and the environment. As much as my background includes physics, geology and electrical energy systems, I'm also a naturalist in the outback so I kind of give more of a shit about the environment than most techhead profiteers. I also tinker in business systems so the gizmos/methods could be delivered into the current energy market as a balanced transition from wind and solar domination to something better without too much disruption to existing trade agreements but certainly with a far better trade-off for the people and the planet. No-one will need to destroy beautiful landscapes or stockpile toxic retirement waste. Anyway. I'll keep plugging away at the application process and hopefully, by the time I get to share more info on it, you'll have all guns blazing to pull it apart.. Cheers :)