Explanation for Rockefeller-trained MDs (the ones still teaching the membrane-pump model while your own textbooks’ own history proves it was falsified decades ago):
The post you just read is not hyperbole. It is the precise diagnosis of why cancer, neurodegeneration, and metabolic disease remain “unsolved” after 70 years of “more data, more pathways, more drugs.” The living cell is not a bag of salty water surrounded by a semi-permeable membrane with Na/K-ATPase pumps burning ATP to keep sodium out and potassium in. That model was experimentally falsified by 1962 using three independent lines of evidence, yet it remains in every textbook because the Flexner-era curriculum cannot survive without it.
Now what nomind did not do.....is go beyond Ling. Ling was right but the science was not precise. This paper in 2025 explains why his post is accurate.
The 2025 Nature Physics paper I'm linking here (
nature.com/articles/s41567-0…) is the Rosetta Stone that translates the historical experiments into modern information thermodynamics.
What Ling never realized is that biology is not fundamental, but physics is.
It proves experimentally, in a real quantum many-body system, that adding information where it does not belong raises the Landauer cost and explodes entropy production.
That is exactly what centralized Rockefeller medicine circus maximus plan has been doing for decades: piling more molecular detail, more genomics, more pathways onto a foundationally wrong first-principles model.
The result is not progress, it is magnified entropy, more disease, and more Rockefeller fiat profit from the downstream patching. Some of us used Ling's idea to build the new system. Those people need to read that system to understand all the problems have been solved by decentralized science by Nature.