Jean Baptiste Burchin, Director at Valeo, expresses his appreciation for the opportunity to participate in a panel at Bharat Innovates 2026, highlighting the platform’s role in fostering meaningful dialogue and global collaboration. He also emphasizes Valeo’s intent to expand its investments in India, reflecting growing international confidence in the country’s innovation ecosystem and its potential as a key hub for future ready technologies. @narendramodi @PMOIndia @eduminofindia @dpradhanbjp @PrinSciAdvGoI @Vineet_K26 @sanjayjavin @IndiaDST @AICTE_INDIA @ugcindia @pibindia @DDNewslive @airnewsalerts @sjaishankaroffc @MEABharat @IndiainPortugal @IndiaembFrance @CGIMarseille @eoiberlin @IndiainIreland @HCI_London @iitbombay @SINEIITB @paniitindia #BharatInnovates #Valeo #GlobalInvestment #Innovation #IndiaOnGlobalStage

🇫🇷 Valeo est un équipementier automobile français, présent dans 29 pays. 🚗 Acteur technologique majeur, Valeo conçoit des solutions innovantes pour une mobilité plus sûre, plus propre et plus connectée. 🏭 Envergure industrielle, l’entreprise emploie environ 100 000 collaborateurs sur 149 sites de production dans le monde. 👨‍💻 Valeo investit massivement en R&D sur l’électrification, les ADAS, l’éclairage et les systèmes thermiques pour la voiture de demain. 🤖 Via son centre Valeo ai à Paris, l’entreprise mène des recherches de pointe en intelligence artificielle pour la conduite autonome, la perception des environnements et l’amélioration de la sécurité. valeo.com/fr/

🏆 Big applause to our phenomenal 2026 batch for securing offers across Jaro Education, JSW, Valeo, and Freudenberg-NOK — proof that SEC graduates are built for every industry! 💥🌍 :: #placementsuccess #industryreadytalent #campustocareer #saveethaengineeringcollege

Yes but aftet the 4,5 million statment they have seen even higher demand from Valeo than expected. Desay SV i dont even think is counted in these numbers. So 2027 will maybe be 10 million??

Gapwaves $GAPW-B had a good day and going back towards the local top. Analysts and pessimists have mispriced this stock because of its subpar Q1 results and long journey to scale, however there is real evidence we are at the inflection point. Thanks to tier-1 partnerships with Hella, Valeo and Desay, the company's scaling looks like this: 2011–2023 (Cumulative): ~60,000 total antennas produced. 2025 (Full Year): ~435,000 antennas produced (validated via their pilot line in Gothenburg). 2026 (Management Projection): Anticipated to scale up to ~4,500,000 antennas. You can see the the growth is now exponential. This has effectively derisked Gapwaves and presents an asymmetrical opportunity. You can't really say it's speculative if their product is already on the road in top vehicles and producing by the millions.

Weź sprawdź sobie jakie podatki w Polsce płaci DHL, Dpd, Orange, t-mobile,valeo czy Google. I później porównaj to do typa z pizzerii. Zdziwisz się.

L’action la plus intéressante sur PEA ? Pour moi il s’agit de STMielectronics Mais pourquoi le marché commence-t-il à la rerater ? Parce qu’en Europe, il existe un besoin croissant de souveraineté dans : >Les semi-conducteurs >L’IA >La robotique >Le spatial >La défense >Les véhicules électriques Et $STM se retrouve au croisement de tous ces thèmes Son exposition actuelle est délirante : >MCU et microcontrôleurs industriels >Puces automobiles >SiC pour véhicules électriques >Photonique sur silicium >Robotique et edge AI >Infrastructure industrielle >Spatial et défense Sa gamme de Partenariats / clients hyper large : > $NVDA (robotique et IA embarquée) > $AMZN / AWS (IoT industriel et edge computing) / Kuiper > $SPCX / Starlink > $QCOM >Schneider Electric >Mobileye >Valeo >Airbus Plusieurs banques ont récemment relevé leurs objectifs de cours, estimant que le pire du cycle industriel est derrière nous et que la reprise du SiC, de l’automobile et de l’IA embarquée n’est pas encore pleinement reflétée dans le titre. Le marché ne valorise plus seulement un fabricant de puces cyclique Il commence à valoriser une plateforme européenne exposée à plusieurs des plus grands thèmes technologiques de la décenniesg Vous en avez ?

At first it was about Valeo and the wage fines. Then Valeo's lawyers entered claiming I withheld discovery to keep my proof from the court and manufacturing evidence 2 days before filing summary judgement. Now we look at Judge Heather Welch deciding to go off script and make the courts a key player in the story... over just $37,000. Part 17: incivilsuit.substack.com/p/p…

Alternatör sorunu 2023'e kadar üretilen Valeo alternatörlü eTSI'lerde vardı. 2023'te Audi başta olmak üzere vag grubu o firma ile hukukî bir süreç yaşadı ve Bosch alternatöre geçtiler. 2023'ten sonra alternatör sorunu yok yani. Bunu hepinize seve seve öğreticez merak etmeyin

Alexander Dennis, Remploy, the COOP coffin plant, McVites, Golden Wonder, Cream of Galloway, Motorola and Ethicon, Valeo Foods, Unilever, basically all now English owned and closed down in Scotland.

You clearly don't like that Elon Musk supported President Trump the last time. That's your opinion and you are entitled to it. But I really like how our constitutional republic is set up with all three branches to check and balance each other. I value the Supreme Court opinions more than yours. The key Supreme Court cases establishing that individuals (and later corporations and groups) can spend unlimited amounts of their own money on independent political expenditures to support candidates center on the First Amendment's protection of political speech. These rulings distinguish between direct contributions to candidates (which can be limited to prevent quid pro quo corruption) and independent expenditures (spending on one's own speech, like ads, that is not coordinated with candidates), which receive stronger protection. Limits on the latter are generally unconstitutional because they burden core political expression without sufficiently preventing corruption. 1. Buckley v. Valeo (1976) This is the foundational case. It reviewed post-Watergate amendments to the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) that imposed various limits. Key holdings: The Court upheld limits on direct contributions to candidates (to guard against corruption) but struck down limits on: Independent expenditures by individuals or groups. Candidates' spending from their own personal funds. Overall campaign expenditures. Rationale: Money spent to advocate for candidates is a form of protected speech. Independent expenditures pose little risk of direct corruption (no quid pro quo) because they are not coordinated with candidates. The government cannot restrict speech based on the wealth of the speaker. Impact: This allowed wealthy individuals (and others) to spend unlimited sums independently to support candidates they favor, while contribution caps remained. It set the framework for treating political spending as speech. 2. Citizens United v. FEC (2010) This built directly on Buckley and extended its logic. Key holdings: The Court struck down federal prohibitions (from the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act) on corporations and unions making independent expenditures from their general treasuries for electioneering communications (e.g., ads supporting or opposing candidates). It overruled prior precedent like Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce. Rationale: Independent expenditures, even by corporations, do not create a sufficient risk of corruption or its appearance to justify restrictions. The First Amendment protects political speech regardless of the speaker's identity (corporate or individual) or wealth. "The Government has muzzled the corporations that have the best records of success." Limits on speech cannot be based on the speaker's wealth. Impact: Enabled "Super PACs" (via follow-on cases like SpeechNow.org v. FEC) to raise and spend unlimited funds from individuals, corporations, and unions on independent advocacy. It reinforced that wealthy individuals (and entities) can spend freely on their own political speech. Related Case: McCutcheon v. FEC (2014) This is adjacent but focuses more on contributions than pure independent spending. Key holding: Struck down aggregate (overall) limits on how much an individual could contribute across many candidates, parties, and committees in a cycle (while base limits per candidate remained). Rationale: These aggregates did not effectively prevent quid pro quo corruption and unduly restricted an individual's ability to support multiple candidates they believe in. It aligns with the principle of allowing robust participation by wealthy donors without broad caps.

But if they drop out of index does that not mean less buyers? Those funds with clients on cac wont be forced to buy valeo? Sorry my French not that good

McAllen is on the rise. Our show host Sergio Sanchez spoke with City Manager Isaac Tawil about the city’s latest sales numbers, construction growth, and new development projects. Tawil also highlighted the impact of Valeo bringing 600 high‑paying jobs to the RGV — a major boost for our region. Watch the full interview. #McAllen #RGV #SouthTexas #EconomicGrowth

Est-ce mauvais ou bon pour valeo??

Valeo arrascapenalt ,vai mantendo nós informado valeo !

Headlamps reached their peak with the Cibie H4; Made in France; light where you need it, sharp cutoff to prevent blinding on coming traffic. Factory bought by Valeo and production wound down. When I owned a JK Wrangler, I swapped the polycarbonate trash for these. Night and day.

ガラコとかボッシュがゴツいなぁと思ってたけどValeo製の純正形状があったのか…

Valeo R1234yf 5-Way Valve for EV Thermal Management ehfcv.com/valeo-r1234yf-5-wa…

there were approximately 1.8 million. The first significant SCOTUS opinion in re campaign finance wasn't First Nat. Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765 (1978). It was Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976). It's true that AJ Powell did write the former, but his 2/x