Just cash in a few MN daycares and autistic centers, chased up with some CA hospice and high speed rail clawbacks. Oh yes, your ridiculous offensive seditious video lead directly to the brutal murder of Sarah Beckstrom. You always seem to conveniently forget about that.

Popular cinema reflects the public's growing rage against institutional rot. 🎬💼 The recent Tamil film #Karuppu strikes a massive chord because it visualizes the agonizing reality of ordinary, vulnerable citizens pushed completely to the brink by a broken legal system and endless court adjournments. In the real world, the ongoing @WorldlineGlobal @WorldlineMS India -@TheOfficialSBI (Falcon) matter in the Bombay High Court carries an identical, devastating human toll. This protracted litigation has dragged on for over a year, and these systemic delays have already cost a human life, we have already lost an affected depositor/defendant during this brutal battle. While retail citizens suffer under the crushing financial and emotional burden of interest and EMIs for an onboarding and compliance breakdown they did not commit, the institutional double standard is a blatant shame: 🏦 The Issuing Banks: Entities like @HDFC_Bank, @ICICIBank and @rblbank demonstrate lightning-fast, absolute operational urgency the exact second corporate revenue or clawbacks are at stake. Yet, when it comes to providing widespread consumer relief to the actual victims, they fiercely resist. 🏛️ The Regulator: The @RBI’s handling of these grievances raises toxic governance questions. Closing out valid consumer complaints under the cover of technicalities like "sub-judice" or "duplicate" directly flies in the face of judicial expectations on consumer protection. We protect the rule of law because it prevents systemic breakdown. But for public trust to survive, the machinery must move before the cost becomes too high for retail citizens to bear. Institutional leaders need to realize that when real-world frustrations mirror the vulnerabilities exposed on screen, public confidence completely evaporates. As of right now, despite anticipation surrounding the June 10, 2026 listing, no official next hearing date has yet been reflected in the public court record. In the film Karuppu, the deity steps in to rescue ordinary people when institutions completely fail them. In the real world, all we seek is a clear next hearing date and an opportunity for the matter to be heard on its merits. Will the system provide that certainty soon, or will justice continue to be denied? 🇮🇳 @suchetadalal @svembu @ShashiTharoor @nsitharaman @nsitharamanoffc @FinMinIndia

Clawbacks are usually covered by the dealership.

@RandPaul Look Rand, the American people deserve #Clawbacks - none of us supported these war crimes.

Some figures to ponder: Under AISH, the maximum financial benefits recipients can get is $1940 a month, and they can earn a further $1072 monthly before clawbacks begin. That's a total of $3012 monthly, or $36144 annually. Under ADAP, those figures fall to $1740 and $700 monthly, for a total earning of $29880 annually. The poverty line in Alberta is roughly $29000-$31000. Danielle Smith took a program that barely kept vulnerable Albertans out of poverty, and cut it. She is evil.

Some figures to ponder: Under AISH, the maximum financial benefits recipients can get is $1940 a month, and they can earn a further $1072 monthly before clawbacks begin. That's a total of $3012 monthly, or $36144 annually. Under ADAP, those figures fall to $1740 and $700 monthly, for a total earning of $29880 annually. The poverty line in Alberta is roughly $29000-$31000. Danielle Smith took a program that barely kept vulnerable Albertans out of poverty, and cut it. She is evil.

People on AISH have been receiving letters from the provincial government telling them exactly what will happen when they get switched over to ADAP. Including the full $200 cut in monthly benefits, AND the $700 cap on monthly earnings before further clawbacks kick in. With AISH, a person could earn an annual combined total of ~$36000, a figure only marginally above the poverty line in Alberta. Under ADAP? $29,000. Under the poverty line. Danielle saw a program that was just barely keeping vulnerable Albertans out of poverty and said, yeah, let's cut that. She's the one with blood on her hands.

Note: The conversion itself counts as taxable income, so you need to be careful not to convert so much that you push yourself into a higher bracket or accidentally trigger ACA subsidy clawbacks (if you're using marketplace insurance during the break).

next time you are with Gavo, ask Gavo and wonder aloud. Here’s a breakdown based on public records and audits as of mid-2026: - Paying homeless to register/sign ballot measures - **Federal action**: In May 2026, Brenda Lee Brown Armstrong (a longtime petition circulator) was federally charged and agreed to plead guilty to paying individuals—including homeless people on LA’s Skid Row—$2–$3 (plus cigarettes/phone cards) to register to vote and sign petitions. This is a felony (up to 5 years). Prosecutors say the investigation continues, with renewed scrutiny of Skid Row activities and ballot harvesting. - Broader probes: U.S. Attorney’s office ( @USAttyEssayli ) has opened multiple election fraud investigations, including voter rolls. Allegations of NGOs paying for repeated registrations surfaced in LA mayoral primary coverage, but no widespread convictions tied directly to state/Dem operations. No evidence of massive outcome-changing fraud proven, per officials. - High-speed rail - **Ongoing failures, no completion**: Massive cost overruns (original ~$33B in 2008 → $126B for Phase 1 SF-LA/Anaheim; full system estimates $200B ). Merced-Bakersfield segment faces $6.5B gap; no full revenue service. Federal funding (~$4B) reviewed/terminated under Trump admin due to delays/noncompliance. - Audits/criticism: State auditor, Legislative Analyst’s Office, and Inspector General reports highlight poor management, transparency issues, and unrealistic timelines (possible 2030s ). New bills for more IG oversight. Billions spent with minimal track laid. - No major prosecutions or project cancellation; scaled-back plans continue amid funding fights. - COVID policies - **Lawsuits/mixed outcomes**: Newsom faced suits over lockdowns, mandates, school closures, and business impacts. Some doctor “misinformation” law challenges succeeded on vagueness/free speech grounds. Retroactive reimbursement laws for COVID services upheld in some cases. No broad criminal accountability for policies. - Settlements: $2B redirected for pandemic learning loss (from existing funds). Broader probes limited; focus shifted to recovery funding. - NGO funneling money back into DNC/Democrats - **National pattern, limited CA-specific prosecutions**: Congressional oversight hearings highlighted “NGO slush funds” and revolving doors (officials → NGOs → donations), but mostly federal/Biden-era examples (e.g., green energy grants). In CA, rural Democratic central committees moved union money to candidates; dark money critiques exist, but no major DOJ convictions tied to Newsom-era “funneling” as described. - Homeless NGOs: Some audits (e.g., LAHSA funding suspension over fraud/weak controls) and criticism of poor oversight, but not direct DNC links proven at scale. - NGO funding for homeless/drug recovery with no measurable results - **Audits confirm tracking failures**: State auditor (2024 report, still relevant): ~$24B (up to $37B in some tallies 2019–2025) on homelessness/housing with poor outcome data. Interagency Council stopped consistent tracking post-2021. Only 2/5 major programs deemed likely cost-effective (e.g., Homekey hotels, family housing support). Unsheltered numbers rose despite spending. - Recent: LA nonprofits faced audits/funding issues (e.g., Weingart Center, LAHSA). Persistent criticism of results vs. billions spent. No sweeping clawbacks or reforms. - Budget expansion with no positive outcomes in education/infrastructure - **Spending up, mixed/poor results**: - **Education**: Per-pupil spending ~$27K (high nationally), with investments in TK, community schools, special ed. Test scores saw some post-COVID gains (Newsom claim), but chronic underperformance in reading/math for many groups persists. Governance shifts proposed; Prop 98 fights over withheld funds. Audits highlight inefficiencies. - **Infrastructure/homeless**: High-speed rail and homelessness as above—billions spent with delays, overruns, and visible lack of results (e.g., more unsheltered in some metrics). - Broader: State auditor/ LAO critiques on transparency and effectiveness. Budgets often use one-time funds; deficits addressed via cuts/delays elsewhere. **Zavala/Michaelson coverage**: Zavala has pressed on transparency (e.g., Capitol projects, some policy outcomes) and interviewed DOJ figures on elections. Less visible deep dives from them on all these exact issues compared to auditors/opposition outlets. These topics often see more scrutiny from state auditor, federal prosecutors, Republicans, or watchdogs than mainstream CA beat reporters. Many issues feature audits exposing problems without structural change in a one-party state. Developments continue (e.g., election probes). Primary sources like state auditor reports or DOJ releases provide the clearest data

@Elex_Michaelson @ZavalaA next time you are with Gavo, ask Gavo about this - California’s Democratic supermajority legislature, Newsom administration responses, and data gaps often limit outcomes. Here’s a breakdown based on public records and audits as of mid-2026: - Paying homeless to register/sign ballot measures - **Federal action**: In May 2026, Brenda Lee Brown Armstrong (a longtime petition circulator) was federally charged and agreed to plead guilty to paying individuals—including homeless people on LA’s Skid Row—$2–$3 (plus cigarettes/phone cards) to register to vote and sign petitions. This is a felony (up to 5 years). Prosecutors say the investigation continues, with renewed scrutiny of Skid Row activities and ballot harvesting. - Broader probes: U.S. Attorney’s office (@USAttyEssayli ) has opened multiple election fraud investigations, including voter rolls. Allegations of NGOs paying for repeated registrations surfaced in LA mayoral primary coverage, but no widespread convictions tied directly to state/Dem operations. No evidence of massive outcome-changing fraud proven, per officials. - High-speed rail - **Ongoing failures, no completion**: Massive cost overruns (original ~$33B in 2008 → $126B for Phase 1 SF-LA/Anaheim; full system estimates $200B ). Merced-Bakersfield segment faces $6.5B gap; no full revenue service. Federal funding (~$4B) reviewed/terminated under Trump admin due to delays/noncompliance. - Audits/criticism: State auditor, Legislative Analyst’s Office, and Inspector General reports highlight poor management, transparency issues, and unrealistic timelines (possible 2030s ). New bills for more IG oversight. Billions spent with minimal track laid. - No major prosecutions or project cancellation; scaled-back plans continue amid funding fights. - COVID policies - **Lawsuits/mixed outcomes**: Newsom faced suits over lockdowns, mandates, school closures, and business impacts. Some doctor “misinformation” law challenges succeeded on vagueness/free speech grounds. Retroactive reimbursement laws for COVID services upheld in some cases. No broad criminal accountability for policies. - Settlements: $2B redirected for pandemic learning loss (from existing funds). Broader probes limited; focus shifted to recovery funding. - NGO funneling money back into DNC/Democrats - **National pattern, limited CA-specific prosecutions**: Congressional oversight hearings highlighted “NGO slush funds” and revolving doors (officials → NGOs → donations), but mostly federal/Biden-era examples (e.g., green energy grants). In CA, rural Democratic central committees moved union money to candidates; dark money critiques exist, but no major DOJ convictions tied to Newsom-era “funneling” as described. - Homeless NGOs: Some audits (e.g., LAHSA funding suspension over fraud/weak controls) and criticism of poor oversight, but not direct DNC links proven at scale. - NGO funding for homeless/drug recovery with no measurable results - **Audits confirm tracking failures**: State auditor (2024 report, still relevant): ~$24B (up to $37B in some tallies 2019–2025) on homelessness/housing with poor outcome data. Interagency Council stopped consistent tracking post-2021. Only 2/5 major programs deemed likely cost-effective (e.g., Homekey hotels, family housing support). Unsheltered numbers rose despite spending. - Recent: LA nonprofits faced audits/funding issues (e.g., Weingart Center, LAHSA). Persistent criticism of results vs. billions spent. No sweeping clawbacks or reforms. - Budget expansion with no positive outcomes in education/infrastructure - **Spending up, mixed/poor results**: - **Education**: Per-pupil spending ~$27K (high nationally), with investments in TK, community schools, special ed. Test scores saw some post-COVID gains (Newsom claim), but chronic underperformance in reading/math for many groups persists. Governance shifts proposed; Prop 98 fights over withheld funds. Audits highlight inefficiencies. - **Infrastructure/homeless**: High-speed rail and homelessness as above—billions spent with delays, overruns, and visible lack of results (e.g., more unsheltered in some metrics). - Broader: State auditor/ LAO critiques on transparency and effectiveness. Budgets often use one-time funds; deficits addressed via cuts/delays elsewhere. **Zavala/Michaelson coverage**: Zavala has pressed on transparency (e.g., Capitol projects, some policy outcomes) and interviewed DOJ figures on elections. Less visible deep dives from them on all these exact issues compared to auditors/opposition outlets. These topics often see more scrutiny from state auditor, federal prosecutors, Republicans, or watchdogs than mainstream CA beat reporters. Many issues feature audits exposing problems without structural change in a one-party state. Developments continue (e.g., election probes). Primary sources like state auditor reports or DOJ releases provide the clearest data.

Yes, we DO need indictments, convictions, retribution and monster clawbacks. That won’t happen, though, because @TheJusticeDept doesn’t do JUSTICE. I’m starting to wonder if it ever did. @potus @VP @FBIDirectorKash @dbongino @AAGDhillon

In any other Universe, in a FUNCTIONING Democracy, that would lead to Impeachment and Investigations leading to Trial that would most likely end in prison and clawbacks of the stolen funds. Even 20 years ago that's what it would have brought in the USA.. but here we are..

Your post certainly has a truthful ring about it. I'm not at all surprised about your description of the money laundering and fraud except for how long it has been successful and how many high level conspirators were silent and complicit. We need indictments, convictions, retribution and monster clawbacks. @potus @VP @FBIDirectorKash @dbongino @AAGDhillon

Rep. Kilmartin, exactly right. The legislators who enabled the V.C. Summer nuclear boondoggle, through the 2007 Base Load Review Act that let utilities charge ratepayers during construction even if the project failed, kept their seats, faced almost no accountability, and years later helped ram through another massive corporate handout. Those same people (or the same entrenched class of them) include: Former Sen. Glenn McConnell, the lead sponsor of the Base Load Review Act that shifted nearly all the risk onto taxpayers and made the $9 billion disaster possible. Long-serving senators who co-sponsored or backed it in 2007 and remained in power for years afterward, such as Senate President Thomas Alexander and others who were part of that General Assembly. Current power brokers who fast-tracked the $1.3 billion (and climbing) incentive package for VW/Scout Motors in 2023, including House Speaker Murrell Smith and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Harvey Peeler, who were deeply involved in the negotiations and approvals with minimal safeguards or clawbacks. The pattern is clear, utilities and big corporations get blank checks or huge subsidies, executives like Kevin Marsh and Stephen Byrne (who pleaded guilty to fraud) walk away with light sentences and golden parachutes, Santee Cooper’s former CEO gets a $16 million exit package, and working South Carolinians get stuck with higher electric bills and the debt for generations. The 2007 law was eventually repealed in 2018 (after the damage was done), but the culture that produced it didn’t change. We keep getting the same results because we keep electing (or re-electing) the same type of politicians who prioritize corporate welfare and “economic development” deals over real accountability and taxpayer protection. You’re spot on, we get the government we deserve until enough people demand better.

Not sure why any1 would ever want it too. Stellar is 12-15 yrs in the making of a solid dominant foundation. With all the right tech. Built in smart contracts, interoperability clawbacks anchors, privacy, now quantum proof, not even XRP or Eth have managed to compete.

@SwapPancak40842 That NFT offer drained your Xaman wallet, 16k XRP, your life savings. I can trace the outflow from the address you posted. I’ve followed trails like this before where tracing led to exchange freezes and clawbacks. I can map what’s still possible. Reach out.

You were both pretty quiet when Josh Frydenberg ran up a quarter of a trillion in debt, and refusing clawbacks of💰gifted to companies rolling in Covid cash.

You mean the WRU have now written off the clawbacks the Ospreys previously owed the WRU. Be honest, Matt, please.

Hey, think you could properly investigate and prosecute/tribunal the defrauding, human rights abuses, and genocide of ADA-disabled citizens, too? Arrests, asset seizures, clawbacks, injunctions. Are we allowed to have basic human rights or recourse yet? 18 USC 242 Treason (WA)