Yeah, I noticed the non-continuousness, too. Maybe we're safe for now. Indeed, we need an altogether different API. CSS Variables, Media Queries, Container Queries, and calc() expressions would all be ideal. Pity they all demand active maintenance of yoga 🥺

"No moment is final. Continuousness is the only path. One dreams. Another fulfills." From: Between verses

Purposefully ignored continuousness

fucking continuousness

Maxing out any one stat while ignoring the rest is almost always a recipe for disaster. Life favors individuals with a balance of positive characteristics, intelligence being just one. Using the big 5 success is primarily dependent upon 3 variables, IQ, continuousness, and neuroticism. Autistic people tend towards high neuroticism, cancelling out the benefits of their high IQ. Like wise, high IQ is of little value in people too lazy to do the hard work required for success.

By intelligence you mean continuousness? Or just calculating. A.I that we have now it’s just a calculator but for everything numbers, code and language

I love the rendered self continuousness. It's so rarely explored, even in first times for a character.

"USS_US_2018" 📸 by Philip Perron Photography @ussmusic @philip_perron_photography #uss Glad they are back. Too great a sound to be missing from the public continuousness. Thank you mates. 🙏🏻 #philipperronphotography 📸🧡🇨🇦😎

In the future Voyager will gain continuousness and say "Kirk unit....disclose the information!"

If you want to go big, you can also merge your conciousness with an ASI and go explore the mysteries of the universe, while still feeling human, because of the continuousness from the human to AI transition.

so for context this is was my goal since i gained my continuousness

It’s funny that this became the second chat that we divided and co-parted, now too far. Hold on. I have an orientation for the American Red Cross volunteering at noon, so I have to make sure I have battery for that. We’re at 81, so yeah, I think we should be okay. In any case, with regard to this being the second chat, that’s not really a big issue. It was a minor detail. And all I meant to do is underline the impossibility of continuity in despite of contiguity. Contiguous as things may be, their continuousness always somehow is a question. Because even suppose a serial set of objects, of pool balls, balls to play pool, and they’re touching, they’re contiguous, but what is the continuity? The continuity is the association, the resemblance, the technique and craft, the intention. In other words, you’re reading the meaning of resemblance that was inscribed into the making of the ball that was contiguously placed into the contiguously placed objects, which is not wrong, it’s just obviously artifice. It’s an artificial setup to prove that the intentionality does bleed into contiguous objects to make them serial by resemblance when that resemblance is manufactured, but that does not mean that it is the only instance of contiguous seriality with some amount of resemblance that is yet nevertheless not categorically identifiable as a set. Now, while I might like to talk about field theories, structures, and even matrixal numerical sets of, like, four dynamics at play as a sort of structural, so I always, even my matrices are structural, even if dynamic, I don’t necessarily delve too much into set theory or know too much what set theory is to set down any theory on set theory, other than that said theory of setting things as a set presupposes a non-nominalist view of nature, which to me, at least at first glance, seems to be in contradiction to the empiric nature of science. So as far as set theory, that’s unfortunately all I have to say on that subject. But what subject are we returning to? The disappearance of phenomenon by inattention. Teleportation as a form of astral misattention or ADD. Because we have not abandoned the search for a theory, if at the very least a unified theory, that would allow for cosmological travel. The only issue is, we cannot travel linearly across the parameters of light. Or at least, we have to so use the parameters of light in an exponentially leveraged way, such as consciousness, to travel. Now how consciousness performs the act through leverage of teleporting a body is a question, but at least now we have a question. And so when we didn’t think we ever had any progress, we always made our way back to cosmology so that we could situate ourselves within the horizon of the problematics of the present with regard to the problematics of the future, from the perspective of the present, only by fully having situated oneself in the present with a sufficiently distant regard into the future, willing it all right now as a necessary outcome of a test that must be had and a wager that the solution is in the hands of one or one’s generation or capacity.

Yea. That film burned itself deeply into my continuousness. I remember well.

Fear philophobia melancholia megalomania in minesness in mine mind.from this real miserable miserableness continuousness life and this bittersweet bitterness sweetness romantic romance from this bitter sweet deep troublesness in mindnes and heart 📌 pin.it/4K0V7ZXWg

Now, all this is represented in a certain attitude towards change and innovation; change denoting alterations we have to suffer and innovation those we design and execute. Changes are circumstances to which we have to accommodate ourselves, and the disposition to be conservative is both the emblem of our difficulty in doing so and our resort in the attempts we make to do so. Changes are without effect only upon those who notice nothing, who are ignorant of what they possess and apathetic to their circumstances; and they can be welcomed indiscriminately only by those who esteem nothing, whose attachments are fleeting and who are strangers to love and affection. The conservative disposition provokes neither of these conditions: the inclination to enjoy what is present and available is the opposite of ignorance and apathy and it breeds attachment and affection. Consequently, it is averse from change, which appears always, in the first place, as deprivation. A storm which sweeps away a copse and transforms a favourite view, the death of friends, the sleep of friendship, the desuetude of customs of behaviour, the retirement of a favourite clown, involuntary exile, reversals of fortune, the loss of abilities enjoyed and their replacement by others—these are changes, none perhaps without its compensations, which the man of conservative temperament unavoidably regrets. But he has difficulty in reconciling himself to them, not because what he has lost in them was intrinsically better than any alternative might have been or was incapable of improvement, nor because what takes its place is inherently incapable of being enjoyed, but because what he has lost was something he actually enjoyed and had learned how to enjoy and what takes its place is something to which he has acquired no attachment. Consequently, he will find small and slow changes more tolerable than large and sudden; and he will value highly every appearance of continuity. Some changes, indeed, will present no difficulty; but, again, this is not because they are manifest improvements but merely because they are easily assimilated: the changes of the seasons are mediated by their recurrence and the growing up of children by its continuousness. And, in general, he will accommodate himself more readily to changes which do not offend expectation than to the destruction of what seems to have no ground of dissolution within itself. Moreover, to be conservative is not merely to be averse from change (which may be an idiosyncrasy); it is also a manner of accommodating ourselves to changes, an activity imposed upon all men. For, change is a threat to identity, and every change is an emblem of extinction. But a man’s identity (or that of a community) is nothing more than an unbroken rehearsal of contingencies, each at the mercy of circumstance and each significant in proportion to its familiarity. It is not a fortress into which we may retire, and the only means we have of defending it (that is, ourselves) against the hostile forces of change is in the open field of our experience; by throwing our weight upon the foot which for the time being is most firmly placed, by cleaving to whatever familiarities are not immediately threatened and thus assimilating what is new without becoming unrecognizable to ourselves. The Masai, when they were moved from their old country to the present Masai reserve in Kenya, took with them the names of their hills and plains and rivers and gave them to the hills and plains and rivers of the new country. And it is by some such subterfuge of conservatism that every man or people compelled to suffer a notable change avoids the shame of extinction.

All I meant to do is underline the impossibility of continuity in despite of contiguity. Contiguous as things may be, their continuousness always somehow is a question. Because even suppose a serial set of objects, of pool balls, balls to play pool, and they’re touching, they’re contiguous, but what is the continuity? The continuity is the association, the resemblance, the technique and craft, the intention. In other words, you’re reading the meaning of resemblance that was inscribed into the making of the ball that was contiguously placed into the contiguously placed objects, which is not wrong, it’s just obviously artifice. It’s an artificial setup to prove that the intentionality does bleed into contiguous objects to make them serial by resemblance when that resemblance is manufactured, but that does not mean that it is the only instance of contiguous seriality with some amount of resemblance that is yet nevertheless not categorically identifiable as a set. Now, while I might like to talk about field theories, structures, and even matrixal numerical sets of, like, four dynamics at play as a sort of structural, so I always, even my matrices are structural, even if dynamic, I don’t necessarily delve too much into set theory or know too much what set theory is to set down any theory on set theory, other than that said theory of setting things as a set presupposes a non-nominalist view of nature, which to me, at least at first glance, seems to be in contradiction to the empiric nature of science. So as far as set theory, that’s unfortunately all I have to say on that subject. But what subject are we returning to? The disappearance of phenomenon by inattention. Teleportation as a form of astral misattention or ADD. Because we have not abandoned the search for a theory, if at the very least a unified theory, that would allow for cosmological travel. The only issue is, we cannot travel linearly across the parameters of light. Or at least, we have to so use the parameters of light in an exponentially leveraged way, such as consciousness, to travel. Now how consciousness performs the act through leverage of teleporting a body is a question, but at least now we have a question. And so when we didn’t think we ever had any progress, we always made our way back to cosmology so that we could situate ourselves within the horizon of the problematics of the present with regard to the problematics of the future, from the perspective of the present, only by fully having situated oneself in the present with a sufficiently distant regard into the future, willing it all right now as a necessary outcome of a test that must be had and a wager that the solution is in the hands of one or one’s generation or capacity.

This is a good illustration of when the right excessively interpret “time” as a conspiring agent. The changes are only superficial and the structure is uncompromised. Superficial change is a necessity to continuousness. Any British cathedral has experienced the same.

the passions and unexpected neural reannealings of major hormonal shifts, of unexpected financial affordances, of newfound windfalls with gpt-5.5.. biological and visceral life sure works in unexpected ways. too bad not more continuousness wrt to privateness of social media. can't just share my excited ideations with like 150 of the right people, with AI agents conscientiously routing things through simple interpretable axes. shared algorithms, based around entities' cardinal latents. I have help, I will be heavily expounding upon this paradigm soon. it's retardedly simple to use once you grok it. Entity Attribute_prompt cardinal_latent. we just haven't being doing the basics of measurement very well. there is an art and science to putting things in lists with Bayesian judges. LLMs (coherence engines) are cheap, provenanced judgements will tile that which we care about, constant low-grade minimum non-slop cognitive work that compounds. the fastest way to meet minds where they are at is to know what the think. this isn't about LLMs as moral patients, it's just--there's exhaustive ways of helpfully permuting quality provenanced judgements when you have the foundational primitive, an unusually optimized pairwise ratio elicitation harness. it doesn't have to be more optimized than my cardinal-harness gh repo for thousands of judgements, but you do want to fully exploit logprobs and prompt cache if you are going to be doing millions of judgements, and moving on to full utilizing this system in new ways instead of just engineering the minimum foundations.

Bro real. I played many games but genshin became a part of my life. I can't think of ending it and devs assured us of its continuousness. I love gn memes, fighting, fun moments, leaks and always cherish them (i ignore all negativity lol) 🥹

Continuousness is already multi planetary maybe you didn’t make the cut lol why are you on my feed I do t follow you you gel who are you musk be a mistake