I am totally fine with major governments using it because they have the resources to ship pallets of cash if needed for darkops stuff. For example, 12b in cash was loaded onto pallets and transported to Iraq to be given to the government there in 2003 and 2004.
The average person benefits more than the government from Monero because the average person is not allowed to withdraw that much cash, cash can be confiscated by police at any time for any reason (see Nevada vs. Lara).
Many said Bitcoin could never reach major adoption because the government would stop it. Monero is in the same boat, except the feds of many countries actually pushed and sued to have Monero delisted, despite that, it recently hit new all time highs and p2p services, an ebay with Monero payment service, and several retail/grocery stores accept monero as payment.
Monero can be privately and trustlessly atomically swapped for Bitcoin, in a way that makes it almost impossible to tell that the bitcoin was used to make an atomic swap for Monero, allowing Monero to be spent for any goods and service thar accept bitcoin.
They try to stop it, but it keeps growing and can't be stopped. The Streisand Effect is heavily in play here.
Privacy is a human right. Consequentialism is a retarded system of ethics that doesn't make any sense, but explaining why is like two undergrad ethics courses, so I cannot break that down at the moment.
I am still of the thought that a world without digital financial privacy actually has worse consequences than a world with it, but as I said, Consequentialism is retarded as an ethics structure anyways.
Privacy allows terrible things to happen, no doubt. Rape, extortion, human trafficking, prostitution, child porn markets, dark weapons markets, hit men markets, etc. will all increase because of private digital financial assets; it is a sad part of Monero existing, but the human right to privacy has always increased these horrible things before The Wired existed, and yet very obviously society has determined privacy is a fundamental right, illustrated most easily by nearly every single having the concept of a bedroom with windows that can be covered and a door that can be locked.