some would call me a procreator

His death is precisely that! Mikhail will die, because the soul of his lover has been reborn in the modern world, in the world created by the Procreator. Furthermore, Mikhail already knew of his death, that is why he died in peace. 🥹

Gay is not love. If you loved your body, you would be what your body is, a “procreator”.

Paltrow’s platform functions as a soft-power bridge between affluent wellness/lifestyle audiences and the defense-tech/national-champion narrative. That matters because Goop is not a Pentagon podcast. It is a prestige-consumer, affluent-female, wellness-coded, aestheticized lifestyle brand. When Anduril’s worldview enters that space, the message is no longer “defense contractor seeks legitimacy.” It becomes something softer: thoughtful founder, moral seriousness, faith, service, complexity, civility, protection, and national purpose. That is laundering in the cultural sense. Goop published and promoted a long conversation in which Scott Galloway argues that modern masculinity should mean becoming a “provider, protector, and procreator,” and later distills manhood as moving from being a “net consumer of resources” to creating surplus value. That language can sound humane, and parts of it are defensible. He does criticize reactionary politics and says women’s economic ascent is good. The framework puts the burden of social repair back on individual men as surplus-producing household assets, while leaving the affluent-consumer audience’s own reciprocal obligations less sharply defined. The overlap is not accidental at the level of cultural function: Galloway gives Goop’s audience a domesticated masculinity narrative. Men should become stable, economically viable, emotionally useful, protective, sexually disciplined, and family-oriented. Stephens gives Goop’s audience a domesticated militarization narrative. Defense tech becomes ethical complexity, civilizational responsibility, Christian conscience, innovation, and national service. Together, the message is: The world is dangerous, institutions are failing, boys are lost, technology is disruptive, and the answer is a new elite-managed moral order: responsible men, patriotic founders, defense innovation, civil service, family repair, and “understanding across difference.” That is why Paltrow is useful. She does not look like militarism. She does not look like Peter Thiel, Palantir, Anduril, Pentagon procurement, or national-security capitalism. She looks like wellness, taste, motherhood, therapy language, civility, and affluent feminine discernment. That makes her audience an ideal laundering channel for harder power. Elite media ecosystems do not need explicit coordination to reproduce elite ideology. They select guests, topics, and frames that make elite interests feel emotionally palatable. Defense tech becomes “protection.” Male obligation becomes “maturity.” Consumer atomization becomes “wellness.” National-security capitalism becomes “service.” The affluent audience is invited to feel morally serious without surrendering its own optionality. Paltrow gave Galloway access to an affluent female audience and gave Anduril access to a wellness-coded moral audience. In both cases, Goop performs the same function: it translates hard social demands into soft lifestyle language. Men are told to become surplus-producing protectors. Defense contractors are recoded as ethical guardians. Affluent consumers are invited to supervise the moral restoration of society without confronting their own role in extraction, optionality, and class insulation. Goop is an ideal cultural laundromat for cabal-adjacent narratives because it converts power into taste, militarization into protection, and gender asymmetry into wellness-coded moral renewal. motherjones.com/politics/202…

Wallpaper de lupita hecho en procreator ✍🏻 🩶simple pero bonito

Scott Galloway tells young men that maturity means producing surplus value: become a provider, protector, and procreator; give more than you take. But the unasked question is: surplus for whom? If men are expected to generate surplus value, are women expected to generate reciprocal value, or merely to select, validate, and consume the surplus? The appeal of his message to affluent women is not mysterious. It offers them a post-feminist bargain: men should recover duty, discipline, provision, protection, and emotional fitness, while women retain choice, autonomy, optionality, and exit rights. That is the bargain modern American society is attempting to sell, but it is failing because it is not reciprocal. It asks men to recover obligation while asking women to preserve freedom. It tells men to become assets, but tells women not to settle. That is not equality. It is a procurement strategy dressed up as moral renewal. It is coded language for the affluent. The better solution for the bottom 90% is not a return to patriarchy and not a post-feminist procurement market where men are told to become assets and women are told to preserve optionality. A reciprocal family bargain for the bottom 90%: men and women both create surplus, both accept obligation, both protect the household, both reject extraction, and society lowers the cost of family formation instead of selling atomized people subscription substitutes for love, care, sex, and continuity. The bottom 90% do not need a procurement strategy. They need a household bargain. The old bargain failed because it subordinated women. The new bargain is failing because it often atomizes everyone. The better bargain is reciprocal obligation without domination.

uhm... tony hawk's procreator?

They're auditioning reality TV stars. People have compared Trump/MAGATS to WWE. I compare Left to The Real Rodent Procreator of DC. Same script complete with heroes and evil AIPAC sponsored villains and an old out of touch Dem power structure that silents & opresses them.

Wow, Mr. @ElonMusk seems to be a celibate philosopher, until Sydney Sweeney swings her b00bs or he gets a massage on his jet. What a great procreator—just like 🐇 in the forest by my house.🥰

After Xenos gave Abel to Hades, Procreator took Aisha to the world he created. After the time skip, Xenos was taken back again as Aisha. And Hades made the same choice of defeating Gaionia to free everybody of their curse.

Frm what i remember, it was already their 2nd time meeting Gaionia. But Hades was k*lled on their first try. They already had Abel that time. Procreator turned back time and took Aisha to the modern world. Bc of the curse, Abel was not affected by the reversal of time. ( )

Procreator 2, le retour. Félicitations 🎉

Elon Musk! The disgraceful procreator...summed up! Too many kids...doesn't he know them!...Too much surgery...plastic man!

Will South-African Elon Musk buy another US election so the US taxpayers can fund his “lunar projects”? If found guilty, there should be a Nuremberg-style trials for this autistic-savant polygamist procreator

Theodore Illion was a traveler and a mystic who belonged to the Club of Rome. In the 1930s, he wrote a series of books describing his adventures in Tibet. Supposedly, he found an underground city where he accidentally discovered an ancient cult of cannibalistic occultists. He claimed they were black Bonpa magicians, who telepathically meddled with earth’s affairs from beneath its surface. After Theodore uncovered them, they astrally attacked the traveler with demonic drones. Apparently, these machines tried to steal his soul in his dreams. Nevertheless, a Bonpa magician is someone who practices Bön, the oldest Tibetan religion. It predates Buddhism and claims to be the first belief system. But in many ways, Bön and Buddhism look the same. Yet, some Buddhists say Bön is corrupted and contains evil sects. Practitioners of Bön believed in a Quaternity rather than a Trinity. They believed The God, The Mother, The Procreator, and The Teacher created the universe in a dualistic way. In other words, existence was made of two forces: light and darkness. Yet, darkness is not a force. It is simply the absence of light. Similarly, evil is the absence of good, like coldness is the absence of heat. This is why dualism is a false doctrine. But I digress. They also believed the cosmos was inhabited by many lesser gods, goddesses, ghosts, spirits, and demons. Some were good and some were bad. Many of these beings were at war with each other. So, the goal of Bön was to become enlightened and liberate one’s self from this cosmic drama. Apparently, there were several ways to do this, or The Nine Ways of Bön. Because of this, it seems Theodore Illion probably wasn’t the first Westerner to cross paths with Bonpa magicians. Apparently, the Cathars and Knights Templar were influenced by Tibetan cults too. According to legend, they were channeling old gods they thought were angels. Some say they had access to The Wooden Book of Montségur. This esoteric text was an “oracle” that could be used to contact The Nine Hidden Masters of Agartha. Like the black Bonpa magicians, these were enlightened occultists who lived in an ancient underground city. The Cathars and Knights Templar would have learned about these things when they met merchants from the East. This is also how Rome found out about Mithras, the Eastern deity who turned soldiers into gods and freed them from the material world. Interestingly, Mithras is where the name Metatron comes from. And John Dee was a Christian alchemist seeking answers from Eastern mystics when he learned about the Book of Enoch, which describes a man named Enoch transforming into an angel named Metatron. This is why John Dee started channeling fallen angels and looking for ancient cities. It seems these occultists believe they can transform into enlightened angelic beings like Enoch did. Many Christians believe the Book of Enoch is true because the Bible mentions Enoch. However, the Bible actually mentions two Enochs, one who was good and one who was evil. And the evil Enoch built an underground city that was destroyed during the Great Flood. Was this city Atlantis? Was it Agartha? It seems Agartha is just another version of Atlantis, hence Hitler’s search for Atlantis in Tibet. Ironically, the Nazi SS was modeled after the Knights Templar. They were also inspired by Rome’s cult of Mithras! It’s also interesting to note that the neo-gnostic founder of analytical psychology, Carl Jung, believed he had achieved self-individuation and transformed into Mithras. Jung considered himself a prophet for the Age of Aquarius, an era of peace and prosperity for occultists. Supposedly, it will begin once humanity is freed from false religions and rebuilds Atlantis. Funny enough, Jung said the true religion would worship a Quaternity rather than a Trinity. It would include Satan! But for Jung, Satan wasn’t so bad. He was actually more like Sophia.

options are limited right now btw: Apple Pro Display XDR (2019) Dell UltraSharp U3224KB (2023) LG UltraFine 32U990A (2025) ASUS ProArt PA32QCV (2025) Kuycon G32P/G32X (2025) Acer ProCreator PE320QXT (tablet not sold in US) Samsung G80HS (announced 5/20) forums.macrumors.com/threads…

The advent of the great procreator.

PROCREATOR BANISH THE TOMATO

That is one!!! WHY INTHE HELL AREN’T THE REST OF MY CHILDREN PROSPERING WITH THE GROWTH OF EQUALITY??? oh ya sorry, Dicktatorshits are still killing equality with their wars of greed to be the procreator. All that proves is that they are the main and only cause of all chaos.!!!!

I had the same visceral response that I get from his procreator. 🤮