That situation is intense; eviction escalates conflict instead of resolving issues peacefully.
I warmly welcome the announcement of a peace agreement between the United States and Iran and the forthcoming formal signing ceremony. This important development demonstrates the power of diplomacy and strengthens the hope for lasting peace, stability, and prosperity in the region and beyond.
Peace is always preferable to confrontation, and sustained dialogue remains essential for resolving differences through peaceful means. I hope this positive momentum will pave the way for greater mutual understanding and enduring regional and global stability.
I commend Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir, Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Senator Ishaq Dar, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and diplomatic teams from all sides whose dedication and tireless efforts have helped make this important progress possible.
Pakistan has always stood for peace, dialogue, and constructive engagement. May this encouraging development mark the beginning of a more peaceful and secure future for all.
Pakistan Zindabad 🇵🇰
6
Dear Rudra, we regret the inconvenience caused and are committed to resolving your issue at the earliest. Please DM your contact number to help us take the necessary action. x.com/messages/compose?recip…
@ayankha79833545
Dear ayan ashrafi khan,
We deeply regret the inconvenience caused and are working towards resolving the issue. Please be assured of our best possible attention at all times.
Regards,
Team CESC Limited
1
1
“Yesterday, I held very productive talks with President Zelenskyy and Putin. I see an opportunity to make progress on this matter, and I believe they are both ready for it. Now that the conflict with Iran has come to an end, I intend to focus on resolving this issue as well,” said US President Donald Trump.
@realDonaldTrump @POTUS @WhiteHouse @ZelenskyyUa @EmmanuelMacron @KremlinRussia
#USA #Trump #Ukraine #Russia #Iran #G7 #Evian #Geopolitics #war
4
Hi!
Thank you for reaching out. To help us proceed with resolving your case, we kindly ask you to provide your response directly to our support team.
Once they receive the necessary information from your side, they will be able to review the situation further and assist you with the next steps.
Thank you for your cooperation and understanding.
1
Hi!
Thank you for reaching out. To help us proceed with resolving your case, we kindly ask you to provide your response directly to our support team.
Once they receive the necessary information from your side, they will be able to review the situation further and assist you with the next steps.
Thank you for your cooperation and understanding.
1
Dear Customer, we understand what you’re experiencing and we’re committed to resolving this quickly. Kindly DM your 17-digit LPG ID, consumer number, agency name, district, location, and registered contact number for further assistance. x.com/messages/compose?recip…
1
4
Though Manoj Sinha did repeat another good statement showing intent from the centre on resolving KP issue .But whether we like it or not ,a brute majority of the muslims in kashmir maybe 90 percent if not more were responsible for KP genocide .their neighbours were responsible.
3
The “two drowning men” metaphor by @abdulslam2017 sounds sharp, but it collapses under basic scrutiny. If both actors were truly “drowning,” they would not provoke such consistent and coordinated pushback from regional powers. States do not expend diplomatic capital, lobbying, and pressure campaigns against entities they believe are irrelevant or doomed.
What this reaction actually reveals is anxiety—not confidence.
Saudi Arabia and its aligned bloc are not behaving like observers of a failed or meaningless initiative. They are behaving like actors trying to contain a development they cannot fully control. Somaliland’s case, in particular, is uncomfortable because it challenges a long-standing Arab League orthodoxy: automatic alignment with Somalia regardless of facts on the ground. For over three decades, Somaliland has restored its sovereignty which KSA was among those congratulated in 1960, maintained stability, institutional continuity, and internal sovereignty that far exceeds the “recognized” federal structure in failed state of Somalia. Ignoring that reality has become harder, not easier.
The contradiction is even sharper in the language used. On one hand, Somaliland is dismissed as “non-existent” and “without legitimacy.” On the other, there is urgency to block any form of engagement with it—whether diplomatic, economic, or symbolic. You do not mobilize against something that has “nothing but a name.” That is the core inconsistency.
As for Israel, framing its moves purely as desperation overlooks a more pragmatic pattern. Israel’s foreign policy—especially in the Red Sea and Horn of Africa—is driven by maritime security, trade routes, and strategic positioning, not ideological charity.
Engagement with Somaliland fits into a broader logic of access and influence along critical shipping lanes. You may disagree with it, but it is not evidence of “drowning”; it is evidence of calculated outreach into spaces where traditional Arab diplomacy has been largely absent or ineffective.
The reference to “Arab principles” also deserves a reality check. Those principles have not been applied consistently across the region. Territorial integrity is defended in some cases and ignored in others, depending on political convenience.
Somalia’s unity is invoked strongly, yet little comparable energy is invested in resolving its internal fragmentation or addressing governance failures. Supporting Mogadishu rhetorically is not the same as stabilizing Somalia in practice.
On Palestine, the claim that it is a “non-existent project” contradicts decades of sustained diplomatic, financial, and political backing from the same actors making that argument. If it were truly non-existent, it would not remain a central issue in Arab foreign policy or international forums. Again, the behavior does not match the rhetoric.
So the “harsh reality” is this:
The intensity of the reaction is proportional to perceived risk, not irrelevance. Somaliland’s incremental normalization—even at a symbolic level—introduces a precedent that unsettles established diplomatic alignments. That is why it is resisted so forcefully.
In short, this is not a case of two drowning men. It is a case of emerging actors testing space in a system where others have long assumed uncontested control—and reacting defensively when that assumption is challenged.
🚨When a drowning person seeks rescue from another drowning person..
Netanyahu’s lack of political direction following the imposition of peace in the region has led him to resort to the same old behavior: attempting to fuel division and support parallel entities by opening a so-called “representative office” for Somaliland in occupied Jerusalem.
The equation here is clear and exposed: an occupying state seeking legitimacy it has failed to achieve for seven decades, granting recognition it does not possess to an authority not recognized internationally. Both parties are chasing a mirage: one ties its fate to the occupier,
and the occupier seeks strategic depth through entities that possess nothing but a name
Saudi and Arab principles are firm and do not tolerate ambiguity; we stand fully with the Federal Republic of Somalia in Mogadishu, and we reject any infringement upon its sovereignty and unity, while awaiting a firm diplomatic stance that restores matters to their legal status. 🇵🇸🇸🇴
1
22
Dear Customer, we understand what you’re experiencing and we’re committed to resolving this quickly. Kindly DM your 17-digit LPG ID, consumer number, agency name, district, location, and registered contact number for further assistance. x.com/messages/compose?recip…
1
Revising a deeply flawed and dangerous bill under a different guise without resolving the major issues is typical Labour government arrogance.
So a deeply dangerous bill that intends to remove safeguards once it’s through the door is being forced AGAIN and refuses to ensure safeguarding.
Anyone who gives a damn about people being able to make a decision on AD without coercion being a factor, will oppose this bill.
Unfortunately, many will still back this bill because it’s the cheaper solution.
They would rather let you, your loved ones suffer to the point of asking for AD rather than fund proper palliative care. That’s already coercion. It’s also cheaper to people being on benefits. In a country that let a mass disabling virus let rip - this is a cost saving bill.
But we knew this was the agenda since the committee stage when we first heard them vote away safeguards for non terminal disabilities. No one needs AD for autism, Down’s syndrome, anorexia or diabetes. But that’s what they voted on. Any safeguards in place to get this bill through the door is smoke and mirrors to allow state sanctioned death via the back door.
It must fail. This bill is completely unsafe for all. Even those they’re hiding this appalling bill behind. They’re using these terminally ill people to get this through. They do not care what happens with them at all.
1
3
7
128
We would appreciate it if you could elaborate your concern via DM. This will greatly assist us in understanding the issue more clearly and enable us to address your concern promptly. Please be assured that we are here to assist you in resolving any concerns. x.com/messages/compose?recip…
1
4
🚀 New listing: PNP $PNP
Traditional prediction markets break because resolving outcomes is too slow. · $PNP just launched an automated, scalable oracle to fix that. · 🔮 The Tech: Uses AI Reasoning (Perplexity, Grok) …
Predict · paper trade · scout the founder 👇
👋 @predictandpump — yours? Claim on Doxxed Crypto with the same official X on DexScreener. Manage community here, run AI agents for updates, get integration tips fast. Feedback welcome · connect = airdrop eligible · lock profile after claim.
#Crypto #FounderOS @DoxxedCrypto
Crypto forgot who actually builds.
#BYOK BRING YOUR OWN KEY
No scams. No pump & dumps. No extractors.
Back real builders. Bring back #HODL.
Build in public. Fund what ships.
curated founders, proof of conviction, Founder OS for shippers.
Join doxxedcrypto.digital/
🎁 10,000 DDollar free at signup
📈 Trade any token for free
🏆 Build a following through skill
doxxedcrypto.digital doxxedcrypto.digital/project…
28
These recent updates are disastrous - has completely tanked my WhatsApp. Literally spending more time on Claude resolving than using openclaw? I keep hitting a released=0 bug & WA responses stalling - & I can’t downgrade back to 2026.6.1 because the WA plugin updated! @steipete
13
Employer’s Bargaining Notes Stay Off-Limits from Disclosure to Union
The NLRB just declined to make parties hand over their bargaining notes — and that's a win for employers.
In a supplemental decision dated June 1, the Board refused to reconsider its 2021 Stericycle I ruling and affirmed the dismissal of a charge that Stericycle unlawfully withheld its negotiation notes from a Teamsters local. Chairman James Murphy and Member Scott Mayer kept the standard in place, adopting the judge's reasoning without much elaboration.
The backdrop: a union asked for "bargaining notes concerning, or relating to discussions about administration of attendance discipline during negotiations." Under Stericycle I, those notes are generally exempt from disclosure. Basically, parties need room to formulate positions and strategy at the table without worrying that every scribble becomes discoverable evidence later.
The lone Democrat, David Prouty, dissented hard. He argued the notes were "presumptively relevant and essential" to resolving a dispute over how to read a new attendance policy. His core point: contemporaneous bargaining notes "are often the best evidence of what occurs during negotiations," and a blanket privilege "deprives the parties — and the Board — of an important tool in uncovering the truth." He'd overrule Stericycle I entirely.
To me, the majority got it right. Negotiations already devolve into he-said-she-said often enough. Forcing employers to produce their internal notes would chill candid prep and hand unions a roadmap to your strategy. Neither helps anyone actually reach a deal — and the Act already has mechanisms to protect genuinely relevant, non-privileged information.
But notice what Prouty is telegraphing. This is a 2-1 call resting on a 2021 precedent. Board law swings with its membership. The privilege is safe today; it is not carved in stone.
Unions often request to see my bargaining notes and file unfair labor practice charges when I refuse to turn them over. They are hoping one administrative law judge will agree with Member Prouty and rule that I have to turn over my notes.
Stericycle, Inc. and Teamsters Local No. 628, 374 NLRB No. 121, Case 04-CA-277775 (6/1/26)
#MattAustinLaborLaw #LaborRelations #CollectiveBargaining
5