What, the disaster that I bring down upon the Sinhalese?
Anyway,
These Muslims lived in the same and benefitted from the same community and spoke the same language as ethnic Tamils, the Muslims saw themselves as separate nonetheless and accepted the Sri Lankan settler colonial government. These same Muslims controlled much of the trade in the North, making them relatively privileged as compared to average non-Muslims Tamils, which would explain their acceptance and complicity of the Sri Lankan government's order.
*****************************************************
Prior to their mass expulsion, the primary consumers of Muslim-owned goods and services were all ethnicities present in the region—predominantly non-Muslim Tamils in the Northern Province, alongside Sinhalese communities and various foreign merchants.
The Muslim community served as a crucial economic backbone in Jaffna and broader northern Sri Lanka. Rather than only selling to co-religionists, their client base and market impact spanned the entire local population:
* Regional Trade and Retail: Muslim traders dominated the "New Market" in Jaffna, the hardware trade, and the textile and grocery sectors. Their customer base was fundamentally composed of the local Tamil majority.
* Lorry Transport and Logistics: Muslim transporters and truck owners controlled a vast share of the logistics sector, moving agricultural and manufactured goods both into the peninsula and out to the rest of the island.
* National and Foreign Consumption: Outside of Jaffna and the Northern Province, Muslim merchants historically catered heavily to Sinhalese kings and the general public, acting as trusted royal physicians, spice exporters, and internal merchants.
The forced expulsion of Muslims (numbering about 100,000) by the LTTE in October 1990 was driven by political anxieties surrounding the rise of a separate Muslim political party and the LTTE's desire for a mono-ethnic state, not by a lack of integration or consumption.
For a deeper look into the historical distribution of mosques, trade networks, and the economic integration of these communities across both Muslim-minority regions (like Jaffna) and the rest of the country, refer to the [ResearchGate Study on Mosque Distribution] and the [International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Analysis]
*************************************************************
So yes, it is a bad thing to not commit to the community it is that you benefit from, living in it even, when Tamils were being class stratified according to ethnicity and language as a form of colonial racism to use language as a means of domination through exclusion and then assimilation of those who seek to be included into the dominant order to try to overcome the structurally enforced racism.
********************************************************
In the context of Sri Lanka, describing the Sinhalese-led government's settlements in the Northern and Eastern provinces as "colonial" or "settler-colonial" is a viewpoint heavily emphasized by Tamil scholars, activists, and human rights organizations. This perspective centers on the following key points:
• State-Sponsored Resettlement: Critics point to government-directed internal colonization schemes (which began in the 1930s and expanded post-independence) that moved Sinhalese populations from the island's south and central regions into traditionally Tamil and Muslim areas in the Northern and Eastern provinces.
• Demographic Shifts: These state-sponsored projects led to significant shifts in the regional demographics. For example, in districts like Trincomalee and Mullaitivu, the Sinhalese population increased substantially, which critics argue is an intentional effort to dilute Tamil political power.
• Cultural Alteration: Alongside physical settlement, these policies often involve the construction of Buddhist shrines and temples in historically non-Buddhist areas, a process frequently described as "Buddhisization" or Sinhalization.
• Loss of Homeland: Tamil advocates argue that these actions are a form of settler colonialism aimed at erasing the historical boundaries of the Tamil homeland and threatening their cultural, economic, and political future.
Conversely, the Sri Lankan state and many Sinhalese nationalists view these actions differently. They frame these resettlement programs not as colonialism, but as the constitutional right of any citizen to live and work anywhere in their own country. The government has historically justified these massive irrigation and farming projects (such as the Mahaweli Development program) as necessary economic development, poverty alleviation, and internal integration meant to benefit all ethnic groups.
The competing historical and political narratives between Tamil groups and the Sri Lankan state are central to the island's long-standing ethnic tensions.