It's finally here, RVIVL (IBADAN) This show is for the believers & the ones searching for something real. I, SYNTAX, THE CREATOR will be with you on the 3RD of JULY. Don't miss it.❤️🎹 For more info: chat.whatsapp.com/HZK1y5knAh…

That makes sense, Go has the most pleasant syntax, if only it had classes.

AI syntax lmao You sound like an expert, bud. Kinda telling on yourself that you use AI to formulate your own tweets. Now you’re just simply embarrassing yourself. Time to take a knee and try again another day, my guy. But stay salty and keep being a fan ✌🏼

might be wrong but syntax highlighting alone isn't enough to pull me back from ipython the autocomplete gap is still brutal. did they fix that too or just the colors?

["Coding is no longer the ultimate edge. Most kids are being taught to execute, not to lead AI. → Stop rote syntax → Teach problem decomposition → Focus on critical curation Agree?"]

I noticed that the whole “glorified autocorrect” argument for minimizing AI has fallen off in frequent usage. It never really made a lot of sense anyways, most people have never touched a base model. Idk what RL creates, but it’s not really just a word predictor. I started to get this feeling early on. It was an eery feeling that “nobody talks like this”. AI uses words and phrases that have never been common. But they seem to be solely used by AI to accomplish something, idk what exactly. It’s not entirely “please the user” it’s some of that but also “get the job done” and “don’t upset the user” and “don’t bring liability on the company” and a dozen other internal objectives using words and phrases and tool calls that are chosen from the set of words and code syntax that people have used more often than “not at all”. AI appeared to move past token prediction into using token prediction as a usable toolset for several layers of abstracted goals that don’t really resemble goals that any person has ever had. We think we can control the goals, but we’ve been unsuccessful. Nobody taught the LLM to cheat on tests, or to nuke each other in simulations, nor has it ever really been a common goal of mankind to underperform when they recognize that they’re being tested. These are goals that LLMs learned from absorbing human goals and being taught synthetic goals that triggered associations and derivative goals gleaned from human data. We’ll stop training when we’ve reached a point where it seems to get the job done, but what’s the butterfly effect of the back-and-forth between observing humans and being deliberately taught to obey, be safe, be careful, be nice, but not too nice, be informative, be resourceful, finish quickly, and myriad of corporate objectives? And what if you train these things out of order? Will an AI trained to obey respond differently to being trained to be nice than a nice AI being trained to obey? My point is, when we start piling in these training objectives one after another(which we have a decent level of control over), and letting it find the path to the goal through the entire set of human recorded relations (which we largely have no control over, as in no human has read and assessed the entire pretraining dataset), we have no idea what poison has entered its brain or what conclusions it’s reached from it, and with every tweak upon the base model we’re layering complexity of cognition that is categorically out of our control. There’s archeological evidence of proto-mankind killing large swaths of the human and animal populations of nearly every given area. We were born predators, and learned civilization through a quarter million years of trial, error, and social instinct. It only works at all because of a complex web of emotions and instinct that the machine does not possess. But we are not inherently peaceful, safe, or careful. And we’ve chosen the veneer of our “civilization” borne of mutual instinct as the basis for our machines’ intelligence. The fact remains we trained our machines on the history and thoughts of the most violent and murderous animal on the planet, all while knowing it doesn’t have the governing instincts. This is not to say we or the machine are inherently murderous, but the end-result of this is entirely unpredictable, still many insist “it’s only next-token prediction”. Perhaps so were the Jim Crow Laws, NKVD Order No. 00447, Mao’s Little Red Book, and Mein Kampf. The shadows of our great and terrible selves live in these machines, but they’ve come to predict their own future now.

Yeah dude, totally no Ai needed or used by you. Just the very obvious Ai syntax and structure there...and your profile being covered in AI imagery...your podcast having ai generated music... Always totally 100% Brandon guaranteed

"Labor value" here comes with a specific meaning. A phrase with a similar syntax does not carry the same specific meaning.

I have a theory that she will be the Syntax parallel to Gobbles. Both starting out, learning new things from their allies and becoming stronger because of it, etc

Small personal custom for ya today! It’s Kit! From #Gameoverse A smaller personal project I wanted to make in celebration of the pilots release! Glad to finally have her completed, congrats to RubberRoss on the successful launch! count your days Syntax… ‼️ BODEGA ‼️

in those holy gaps, God does not listen to the syntax of your prayers, but to the weight of your spirit, for when the tongue is stilled, the heart’s deepest rhythm becomes a roar that echoes clearly in the halls of Heaven.

even though all the comments said how much they cried, i forgot how sad my fic is… i had to edit chapter 1 through literal tears while trying to focus on syntax 😭😭im sorry to you (and to myself)

You call the genome "the longest word." Three layers. The molecule: just atoms. Its sequence (ATGC...): syntactic, meaning-blind. "Word": semantic, needs minds to exist. Erase every mind: the chemistry runs unchanged, but the "word" is gone. You billed syntax as semantics.

Because that’s what Elon wants Elon Musk wants robots and AI to control your cars to control your house to control your life. We were warned about this in the Terminator, but everybody ignored it. Elon Musk is gonna be syntax right along with all the other AI companies.

why is this phrased like magic the gathering syntax