The Agile Manifesto says we "build projects around *motivated* individuals." ❤️
Want to know the 2 main reasons why Scrum and Agile transitions fail: 🤷♀️
1. The individuals on the team are not motivated 😞
2. The individuals want to work in silos, not as a team 👯
The bigger problem?
Many in the Agile community can't come to grips with the fact that some people are unmotivated, nor can they come to grips with what to do with those people. 🤦♀️
I once suggested on LinkedIn that destructive, lazy, unmotivated and deleterious employees should be let go, and the blowback was amazing. 💣
"You should do everything humanly possible before you let an employee go" was a common response.
Of course, when I asked if they'd share their salary to keep the unmotivated employee motivated, the virtual signalling of 'doing everything' quickly came to an end. 💰 💰 💰
So what happens when you keep unmotivated and deleterious team members around?
What happens when you keep people on the team who are lazy and don't do their work?
Here's the reality: you have to manage them. 🤦♀️
✅ You have to assign people who can't self-manage JIRA tickets.
✅ You have to track the work of unmotivated people.
✅ You have to give people who can't self-manage assignments.
And you know what else?
All of this ends up spilling over to the rest of the team.
In the end, everyone gets managed. No organization hires a person to manage just one individual on a team. Everyone gets managed once a manager comes on the scene.
If you want to be Agile, and you want Scrum to work, respect what the Agile Manifesto and the Scrum Guide says.
Developers are expected to be motivated and self-managing.
If you think Scrum will work, or an Agile transition will take hold with a group of unmotivated individuals who are unwilling to manage themselves, you are setting yourself up for some significant disappointment.