I do not understand the debate between orderbooks, RFQ and AMM trading models for broad RWA perps.
Orderbooks are great for realtime liquidity and price discovery, this has been proven by weekend volumes on closed underlying markets. They are however very capital intensive to bootstrap when there is not natural demand in a market.
RFQs are better suited for large block trades to optimize for slippage, especially on less liquid markets. BlackRock's trading desk for example routes legs of large orders across many different algos on orderbooks and direct to counterparties via RFQ to reduce price impact. In crypto, daily RFQ volume on majors is massive, and on alts they are often used to preserve privacy and limit price impact.
AMMs and bonding curves are especially effective at bootstrapping liquidity as it is simple for anyone to market make (LP), but often comes at the expense of capital and market efficiency for both sides of a trade.
There is no one size fits all for any asset class or market. As a result, we will be supporting a multitude of trading models to address user's needs for breadth, depth, and 24/7 trading. This is only possible by owning the underlying infrastructure and allocating liquidity on books to the highest demand pairs.
Ideally an end retail user should end up with the best possible execution for the exposure vehicle and order of their choice.
CLOBs are not going to take us to the RWA promised land.
Today Hyperliquid owns the liquidity for a handful of RWA macro names. But outside the top 10 traded assets (which are ~90% of volume) liquidity falls off a cliff. When there's enough retail demand, order books can work. But "perps on everything" is a different problem, and TradFi solved it decades ago.
The answer isn't every venue rebuilding its own order book. That's not what Robinhood does, it's not what Schwab does, and it's not what DeFi should be doing either.
Building your own book for every asset means bootstrapping demand ticker by ticker, renting liquidity with subsidies, and ending up with thin markets that blow out 200x the moment news hits. It's like sucking the ocean of TradFi liquidity through a straw.
Variational skips all of it via the RFQ model. RFQ is how institutions like Dragonfly actually trade. In RFQ, dealers quote just-in-time and hedge on the primary venue as orders come in. This lets Variational mainline TradFi liquidity directly and mirror it on-chain. Margin in smart contracts, settlement in stablecoins, liquidity aggregated from the people who already trade on the biggest underlying markets, like the CME and NYSE.
It makes it permissionless to access the same depth and spreads the big boys get. With the cold start problem gone, new markets can ship at the speed of software.
By next year I expect RWA perps to be the biggest contract class on-chain, bigger than BTC and ETH perps combined. That's how crypto truly becomes the market for everything.
I believe the platform that wins that won't look like a traditional exchange.
Proud to lead Variational's $50M Series A.
Watch this space.