That’s hardly surprising ;). People with IQ eventually move on once they realize leadership isn’t willing to listen... let alone lead with intelligence. We’ve been saying @RichardHeartWin for many months exactly what needs to change, but apparently reading random bullshit on X matters more to leadership than actually addressing the real issues. Zero visible progress. Very unfortunate. (Ah yes, of course... “PuLsEcHaIn HaS nO lEaDeRsHiP, iT’s ReAl DeFi ” 🤡) It’s still not too late if the ecosystem would finally start listening to and following the people who actually matter and know what they’re doing, but an unnecessary amount of damage has already been done. And frustrated “retard” salvos directed at the community, as understandable as they may be, move this ecosystem forward by exactly 0.0. 🏆

Cappy early website is up: cappy.cash Cappy X account: @CappyWallet Just wanted thank you guys for all the support on this. This is just the tip of the iceberg, there are a lot of things I plan to do in as short as possible of order. Couldn't do it without you guys. I'll be splitting updates between my personal / Cappy X accounts. I've been asked many times how people can help, I put some info on the site for now. Anyways, less talking more doing. The roadmap on the site is accurate as of right now. But I'm moving fast. I want this wallet to exist so I can enjoy it too.

When PulseChain launched, the one thing I knew we were going to be missing was infrastructure. Not hype. Not another token. Not another chart. Infrastructure. Ethereum had years to build out the tooling, RPCs, indexers, data services, dashboards, wallet support, integrations, and all the invisible pieces that make a chain actually usable. PulseChain needed a lot of that on day one. So that’s where I focused. It is a relatively thankless part of the ecosystem. Most people only notice infrastructure when it breaks. It does not really have a flashy narrative. It does not pump because a node stayed online. It does not trend because a backend service quietly handled traffic for another app. But a lot of projects depend on it. That work was hard, and for the most part, I do not really make anything from it. I did it because I thought it needed to be done. At this point, I consider a lot of that infrastructure work done. Or at least done enough that I can start shifting more attention toward the next missing pieces. Software is like an onion. There are layers upon layers. Most people only see the final app, the interface, the button they click, or the thing they directly use. But underneath that are all the other pieces that have to exist first: RPCs, APIs, data services, indexers, contracts, routing logic, security assumptions, UX standards, integrations, and a dozen other things nobody really wants to think about until something breaks. Some software cannot properly exist until other software exists beneath it. And when those lower layers are missing, someone has to build them. That is a lot of what my work on PulseChain has been. Not just building the thing people see, but building the things the visible thing depends on. That also means I have had to put my own personal opinions aside in a lot of cases. There is software out there that I do not personally agree with. There are projects I would not use myself. There are decisions I may not like, products I may not believe in, and approaches I may think are wrong. But infrastructure has to be agnostic. If you are building foundational layers for an ecosystem, you cannot only support the things you personally like. You cannot alienate every project you disagree with. You cannot build in a way that says, “This only works for my corner of the chain.” That is not how we grow. A real ecosystem needs room for different products, different opinions, different strategies, and different types of users. Even when I disagree with someone, that does not automatically mean they should be cut off from the infrastructure layer. That is not always easy. But I think it matters. And to be clear, I see a lot of devs working very hard on a lot of things. I do not like shitting on people who are actually building good things. I can personally disagree with someone’s direction and still respect the work they are putting in. Those two things are not mutually exclusive. There are projects I might not use myself. There are design choices I might not make. There are products I might think should go a different direction. But if someone is showing up, writing code, solving problems, and trying to make the chain more useful, I respect that. The beauty of software is that none of this has to be winner-take-all. If another dev does not like Cappy, but they like a feature in it, they can implement that idea in their own way. If they think I missed something, they can improve on it. If they think my approach is wrong, they can prove it by building something better. That is how this should work. And in cases where there is strong overlap, I will even help where I can, as time allows. That is how you grow. That is how you get taken seriously as a chain. In my opinion, anyway. I can be wrong. That is part of why I’m building Cappy. If you do not like Cappy, you do not have to use it. I mean that sincerely. I am not building a wallet because I think everyone has to agree with my taste, my priorities, or my product decisions. I am building the wallet I personally would want to use. That may not be the wallet you want to use. That’s fine. Some people like Microsoft Word. Some people like Google Docs. Some people like Rabby. Some people like MetaMask. Some people want something simple. Some people want something powerful. Some people want every possible feature. Some people want as little friction as possible. There is no single perfect answer for everyone. But the wallet I wanted to use on PulseChain did not exist in the form I wanted it to exist, so I decided to build it. A lot of the pieces of this chain, I honestly thought other people would eventually figure out. In some cases, they did. In other cases, not really. I thought we would attract more external devs. I thought more projects would port over. I thought more teams would support their forks. I thought more of the obvious gaps would get filled over time. Maybe I was wrong to expect that. Maybe I should have seen it differently from the beginning. Either way, it is what it is. At some point, I stopped waiting for other people to build the things I wanted to see exist. That does not mean I think I am always right. I am not infallible. I am sure I will make decisions some people disagree with. I am sure some people will not like the way I build things. I am sure some people will think I should be working on something else. That is fine. You can dislike the software I write and not use it. It really is that simple. But I am going to keep building the things I believe are important. People ask, “What about Sigma?” I am working on it in parallel with Cappy. People ask, “What about Cross Chain IcosaHedron?” I am working on it in parallel with Cappy. People ask, “What about the other ten pieces of software the ecosystem still needs?” That is exactly the point. These things are not always separate in the way people think they are. A wallet needs infrastructure. Cross-chain systems need reliable data. DeFi products need tooling. User-facing apps need lower-level services that most people will never directly touch. Some things need other things to exist before they can function properly. And if those other things do not exist, someone has to make them. I am not randomly jumping between projects. I am building the layers that make the next layer possible. I have been told many times that I should run a foundation, or try to organize things, or try to be some kind of public face for the ecosystem. I do not know if I would even be good at that. Maybe I would. Maybe I would not. What I do know is that I am at least decent at software. So that is where I am putting my energy. I can try to do the things I wish more people were doing. Am I the happiest with Richard right now? No. Do I respect what he has built? Yes. Am I still hopeful for the future? Yes. Those things can all be true at the same time. I have more or less put everything on the line to move quickly and build things I think matter. The infrastructure phase was the first big priority, and I think that work is now far enough along that I can focus more heavily on actual products people can touch, use, critique, and hopefully benefit from. Many of you support me, and I see that. I do not take it lightly. All I can really promise is this: I am going to keep trying to give this ecosystem the best software I can. Not because everyone has to use it. Not because I think I am the answer to every problem. Not because I agree with every project. But because I still believe PulseChain deserves better tools, better infrastructure, better user experiences, and more people willing to actually build the missing pieces. That is what I am trying to do. Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk. I hope you like the things I do. None of this is any kind of advice, especially financial and P.S. Cappy comes with a block explorer that (hopefully) people find fast and functional enough to like. It was a requirement to make Cappy work. Modified Blockscout fork.

Mega, guys. I strongly encourage @RichardHeartWin to take a closer look at what you’ve consistently proposed, especially around strengthening developer attraction. Your solution holds substantial, still underestimated potential and could be a key driver for long-term investor conviction in the chain. Unfortunately, that signal doesn’t seem to be landing yet. Read it, @RichardHeartWin 👇 x.com/piteasio/status/202584…⁠

Sell crypto. Get Euros. In ~10 minutes. That's it. No waiting days. No confusion. Built for the @PulseChain community. By people who actually use it. 🫀 @SUNMINIMEAL @PulseChainStats @Hexologist31 @RichardHeartWin #PulseChain

ETHEREUM IS GOING QUANTUM SAFE 🚨 VITALIK UNVEILS A 4-YEAR ROADMAP TO MAKE ETH FULLY QUANTUM RESISTANT BY 2029. 4 KEY VULNERABILITIES IDENTIFIED. 7 NETWORK FORKS PLANNED. THE BUILDING BLOCKS ALREADY EXIST. ETHEREUM GETTING READY FOR A BIG RALLY. 🚀

“Things Have Their Reasons” or “The key to ecosystem success that only needs to be turned” @RichardHeartWin , This is not a cry post. It is our last constructive attempt to help restore vision and hope in the ecosystem. It has nothing to do with the current price, and everything to do with the fact that we have reached a point where meaningful parts of the PulseChain investor landscape are changing. Some context on who is speaking: We onboarded tens of thousands into PulseChain, actively accompany hundreds of serious investors in private groups, integrated multi-million-dollar companies into PulseChain, and are currently in talks with several multi-billion-dollar companies about tokenization and their home in crypto. “Winners learn from setbacks and evolve. Only the insane refuse to change their behavior while expecting different results.” We want to describe the real challenges and then outline a concrete plan that can make this ecosystem stronger than ever. First: about you. The community simply likes to see you. You have charisma and people sense a good soul behind your eyes. That is one big reason why they long for your visual presence. It is also an economic factor: if used consistently, even only through video messages, it would measurably help the ecosystem. You are right that prices reflect the holders. But holders are shaped by a) their emotions and b) their understanding. If these two are not addressed responsibly and regularly, people lose orientation, uncertainty grows, identification fades and their emotional bond to your vision weakens. This creates a real blockage on the road to glory, because growth is then partly sabotaged. The community will not stop wanting these two points (a b) directly from you, at least not in the first cycle of this new ecosystem. Your ecosystem grew around you as the center. Most people did not trust HEX solely because of the math, but because they saw in you a visible crypto competence, intellect and charisma that could win any dialogue battle. They did not just say yes to a token. They looked you in the eyes, saw genuine passion, and believed you might be one of those rare frontmen leaders with whom extraordinary success becomes possible. Not because you know or can do everything, but because you are willing to go the extra mile and you understand that persistence beats omniscience. Yes, everything was simpler when there was only HEX and one united community. But simpler is not the same as right. Expanding into a full ecosystem was absolutely the right step. Your community is strong enough to carry it. The first big challenge was that sacrificers received up to 150 percent of their capital as gifts. That does not make organic price discovery easier. Many top sacrificers have barely felt bear market pain. But healthy prices require pain. Those who cannot walk the journey must be washed out, freeing space for new, hungry, energized participants. This constant renewal strengthens the foundation from cycle to cycle, even if it hurts in between. So if it dips, let it dip. If OG pain is needed, so be it. There should be no market making in a bear market depression. Better we start the new ecosystem with a hard core and new strength than with a large mass of millionaire crybabies. What we as HexScout have done so far: 🔥 We built HEX’s leading brand dApp. 🔥 We brought the fastest global fiat on-ramp (RampNow) into the ecosystem. 🔥 We integrated Hyperlane, the most modern bridge, connecting PulseChain to over 140 chains. 🔥 With Hyperlane we removed the single point of failure (exclusive reliance on Ethereum) and secured the chain’s only multichain-backed stablecoin, hUSDC (currently tradable via Piteas). Over 500k monthly Hyperlane users from 140 chains are now a potential inflow. 🔥 We co-built and co-funded the explorer scan.pulsechain.box, giving the community the only explorer where PulseChain data is complete and bug free. 🔥 We are helping RampNow launch the first cross-chain swap that can swap any crypto asset in the world directly into PulseChain assets, and pushing for a PulseChain wallet that unites the best of modern wallets and connects directly to fiat. The barriers to entering PulseChain have largely disappeared within the last two months and are shrinking further. We are just two normal guys working full-time for years for your ecosystem and vision. The community sees that this level of progress can come from two regular people without sac funds and without free access to top developers. Naturally the intelligent follow-up question is: “How is it possible that two normal guys without resources deliver so many critical things the ecosystem needs, while the entities at the top of the ecosystem, who collected billions in sacrifices, have not delivered a single recognizable ecosystem evolution for more than two years?” Serious investors cannot reconcile that, and step by step we are losing holders and loyalists who came to the chain with long-term intent, not just for quick Xs. The ecosystem also sees the huge opportunity Hyperlane brought, one of the strongest onboarding tools we have. Yet it receives no PulseX support, is not mentioned on pulsechain[dot]com, and you have never spoken about it, despite Hyperlane already bringing millions of dollars onto the chain. So 500k @hyperlane users from other ecosystems stand in front of a closed door. At the same time, the community sees public blame discussions for weeks. They feel the chain is under-supported; the founder responds “you are responsible for the price.” Both statements are partially true. But without active leadership in the right places, there will not be enough vision and identification to sustain the community. This cannot simply be ignored or laughed off, unless one has become a fanatic who has lost all rationality. Fanatics are loud but irrelevant. What matters are the many quiet, real investors who have already stepped onto PulseChain with serious intent. We are in private groups with hundreds of European investors. We feel the sentiment of the quiet but powerful group of honest investors who are not here for a fast dollar. They have waited patiently to see whether Hyperlane would be pushed to its maximum potential. Experiencing complete neglect is something they simply cannot understand. Especially when, at the same time, cross-chain transactions offered by anonymous middlemen via private bank accounts are being encouraged, even though their business stops every time the PulseChain Main Bridge pauses. This is where parts of the community are lost, because they can no longer follow what is happening. And this is where ecosystem champions like us must say “We do not understand it either,” and seriously ask “What are we working so hard for if even obvious chain evolution receives no support from the top?” Developers can accept that to a point, but such patterns will inevitably drive away supporters. PulseChain was created to claim a place as a chain. As an Ethereum fork it has ideal prerequisites. We have the chain, the ecosystem, the capital to give a new thing the necessary starting leverage, and strong contributors and developers like Piteas, Coast, RampNow and many others. The community has delivered hard for years, through the longest bear market ever and the harshest FUD conditions. Yet for over two years there has been no recognizable chain evolution. Not a single Ethereum upgrade has been adopted. The official explorer has not been able for years to show the transfers tab reliably. That is not a minor bug. It is a serious issue that many cannot understand. Every explorer user ends up asking: “What kind of chain is this if the main explorer does not even allow me to reconstruct my own transactions for taxes?” This creates real image damage. Yes, there are alternatives like our explorer, but mass adoption of alternatives is rare. And if our explorer suddenly became the main one, it currently could not handle the traffic. We have offered the same solution many times: take over our explorer, add whatever you feel is missing (we will gladly help), give it the required performance, and we have a fix. Alternatively, finally fix the transfer tab bug after years, and treat the image damage it causes like the serious issue it is. It is not the community that is failing to build. The bottleneck is the center: the entity that collected billions in sacrifices from people who believed they were joining a unique DeFi vision. Of course there should be no formal expectation of work from others. But believing you can sit on hundreds of millions in sac funds without at least using some capital to build critical infrastructure is naive. One for all and all for one. Richard for glory. That vision cannot be left entirely to the community. It needs clear motivation and role modeling from the front. A couple of sporadic updates are not enough. People need tangible, visible progress to celebrate, not every month, but at least every 6–12 months. A key to a flourishing ecosystem is an optimal base for those who want to grow it long-term. Only these long-term builders create the hope that the ecosystem can one day be less dependent on a central authority. The community has already contributed significantly here. @piteasio proposed an excellent idea for a strong developer base (x.com/piteasio/status/197917…). Another highly respected developer, @SIN3R6Y, underlined similar needs (x.com/SIN3R6Y/status/1996280…). These are among the smartest and most loyal people in the ecosystem. So far, they have been ignored. Leading minds get too little attention. This is not about ego. It is about progress. The community sees time being spent debating haters and whiners, and chatting with retards, while critical contributors receive no reply, even when their posts clearly get the most engagement. This creates deep insecurity. In backrooms everywhere people are asking: “Why build an ecosystem and a smart contract chain that lives on third-party development, if years later there is still no infrastructure to motivate developers to settle here, as on every other serious chain?” These are top priority topics. They must be addressed. The irony: the community is ready to do the work and only needs the official blessing that such initiatives are welcomed. Beyond those basics, people also need a reason to believe in growth. Signaling, through a strong dev base, that the chain is an extremely attractive place for builders is a crucial first step. But building confidence in a community requires strategy: 🔵 professional core websites (still missing) 🔵clear market positioning for the ecosystem (still missing) 🔵strategic communication 🔵professional marketing on top of that (still missing, despite millions burned on experiments) Even this challenge has already been partly solved by the community. Months ago we secured a top tier agency that has guided billion-dollar companies to success and is ready to put PulseChain in the global spotlight. For months we have fought for this to be understood. For months the community has shown strong support, hoping for a simple “OK, let us try this, let us finally do it professionally and structured, and see whether this path works better than the past years of alternative approaches.” So far, there has been only silence. Meanwhile the community sees hundreds of millions of sac funds, watches millions burned here, hundreds of thousands evaporate there, and at the same time sees that we could start testing this agency with modest budgets. Once again people are left with the big question: “Why not at least test this visibility opportunity, when significant parts of the community are at their moral limits, developers are withdrawing, and even major loyal contributors are appealing for a more honest reflection of the situation?” We are not speaking only for ourselves. We are giving voice to a broad consensus among meaningful, loyal, non-opportunistic devs and ecosystem builders in our network. We urgently hope this organic backbone of the ecosystem is heard. The bright minds that carry the ecosystem are ready not only to build, but to engage in a truly strategic, private dialogue with the founding side. There are many strategic topics that do not belong in public. There are many insights to share to maximize success. So we ask directly: Can a private space be created where loyal top contributors and the founding group can coordinate? Can this separation end? Can a productive working structure be installed? Everyone with a brain knows that united builder energy, competence and intelligence is a powerful weapon. 🏆 Master plan for sustainable growth and stronger investor demand: PROFESSIONALIZE DEVELOPER FOUNDATIONS • Give the green light to developer incentive systems like Piteas proposed. • Set up a funding pool for external developers who credibly want to bring meaningful DeFi projects to PulseChain. • Create a closed space for loyal top contributors and you, plus a small, competent management structure that builds and maintains a strong crypto network and follows a clear agenda. PROFESSIONALIZE MARKETING • Start working with a top-tier marketing agency (for example the one we have already secured). • Clarify the brand: What is PulseChain? A free airdrop? ETH, but faster? A DeFi home base? A brand identity and positioning must be developed with the top minds on the chain. At the moment there is no brand, no positioning, no structured outreach. • In general: work with professionals. The sacrifice phase was world class. Almost everything since then has not been. That gap must be closed. UNLOCK GROWTH POTENTIAL • Give Hyperlane (hUSDC) a solid place on PulseX. • Grow liquidity of hUSDC, the only multichain-backed stablecoin on PulseChain, to parity with eUSDC. • Present Hyperlane properly on pulsechain[dot]com as the only true, non-pausing cross-chain bridge into PulseChain that can secure constant inflow. OPTIMIZE COMMUNICATION • Use communication to build unity. Show more understanding for small investors who put in their last money and had big hopes. They must not be insulted into the ground. That is unworthy of a leader and is only cheered by fanatics, who are loud but irrelevant for long-term success. • Communicate transparently with the community: what is being built, what devs are working on, why things take time. • Explain how confusing or painful states will be addressed: the transfer tab bug, recurring bridge pauses, the adoption of Ethereum upgrades, the chain evolution roadmap, and the plan to evolve PulseX beyond a Uniswap V2 fork while V4 exists. • Bring in more top-tier developers. Every month there should either be visible progress or at least a clear progress report. • Hold regular leader messages from you to the ecosystem. Everything above can be ignored. But that would mean ongoing self-sabotage. Yes, capital can create green candles as long as it lasts, even with a weak foundation. But the price of that approach is the disbelief of serious investors who could otherwise be with us for multiple cycles. The price is becoming exit liquidity for everyone who no longer wants to tolerate underperformance and who sees too little perspective and trust, even after a few Xs. Supporters like us will also leave in that case. We have no expectation of others’ labor. But we did not show up for a few quick Xs. We came to help carry a long term vision through multiple cycles into glory. For that, the vision must remain real and professionally tangible. @RichardHeartWin, thank you for who you are. 🙏 You give real DeFi people the hope that one day we can show the world that nothing is real DeFi but PulseChain, no matter how bumpy the road is. We still believe in you, in your intentions and your honesty. Please allow help. Let us stand closer at your side to achieve your goals. Accept the gift of combining different competencies to strengthen the army, build a sustainable future and reach glory. You could flip certain switches today, communicate them clearly, and everyone would see immediately that something has clicked and is changing. That new path would inevitably be huge. P.S. ⚖️ We have disabled comments on this open letter. It is not meant as a public debate, but as a direct message from a contributor who has earned his place by actions. Block us if you cannot handle that. In that case you are not a net positive for this ecosystem’s evolution, but a primitive hater, incompetent, blinded by fanatic loyalty or a troll in disguise trying to sabotage the progress this ecosystem urgently needs and that lies directly in front of it. If you think you are doing something good for the ecosystem, prove with actual deeds that your opinion should be taken seriously. ❤️ To all our followers and the tens of thousands we onboarded to PulseChain, to the hundreds of investors we support in private groups, and to the many developers who know we are speaking here from full heart and full mind: Thank you for the journey so far. Thank you for your positive engagement. 🙏 An ecosystem needs people like you. It cannot be carried by one person alone. With this letter, we are once more fighting for your visibility. May it trigger something so that together we flip the switch and lead this ecosystem to glory. It is an easy decision. The path is open. The base to act is still there.

I do think a #pulsechain foundation would be beneficial. c3 or c6, either way but c3 is cooler. Something that can legally take in tax-free donations and allocate funds transparently to things that improve the chain but otherwise wont get done because there is no incentive. Do I think @RichardHeartWin should make this foundation? No. I think we, the community, and its builder community should do it. I know I would be willing to help oversee it in my free time. Maybe he would donate to it, that would be cool. But I do think its creation is on us. And it should be done without the expectation of his donations. Otherwise it's foundation would be murky. And the kicker, anyone who serves on its board shouldn't be able to get grants from it. Even if it's warranted, it's a conflict of interest. This in and of itself does limit it's viability in terms of who could participate. I have advocated for this in the past, but it's not a one man job.

The message is clear: #PulseChain needs a proper wallet. We’ve decided to ship one — open source, non-custodial, PulseChain-first, and integrated with Rampnow. Give us 10–12 weeks. The community energy made this impossible to ignore. @RichardHeartWin @hexscout

Thinking of launching a non-custodial wallet with #PulseChain as a native chain — fully preloaded with PulseChain RPC tokens. It includes: • Direct Rampnow on-ramp • Any-chain → PulseChain bridge • Swap in one place Would the PulseChain community use it? #tiredofmetamask @RichardHeartWin @hexscout @piteasio @pulsechain

If we gave you $2000 to spend during this dip, which one would you buy? Be honest 👀 All available at rampnow.io #rampnow #CryptoMarket