I think when I say that Black studies that continues to go over the history and plight of Black predicaments without offering a look into the future are frustrating (for me) I say that bc there is a thought that people already know their predicament. Not that people are already
beginning to have a sense of why I would do work on the former. And in some ways that becomes the way to get (more people) to trudge on in the types of explorations I think Black studies needs. That looks more like my middle ground. I do stuff on the fringe/frontier and teach
at the level of what brings us to, or inspires us, or urges/pushes/calls/beckons us to explore these same topics at the periphery of the present (near-future) all the way into the distant (less-than-systematically-imagined) future.
Just finished the last season of @SuitsPeacock and I could have sworn I’d seen the entire thing like season 6 or 7. Did my @netflix show me the wrong season? Felt like hella recycled material and like the writing didn’t evolve at all…damn that was disappointing
Don't stop talking about Congo
Don't stop talking about Kenya
Don't stop talking about Ethiopia
Don't stop talking about Sudan
Don't stop talking about Nigeria
Most students don't know what questions to ask when thinking critically.
But, critical discussion is the ONE aspect of academic writing needed to be included in a literature review.
Here are some questions that you should ask when reading and understanding research papers:
does take place in darkness. There isn’t enough light to completely eradicate darkness at any time. And if darkness is present-eminent to light but light cannot surpass darkness it just highlights that there is further darkness to explore than is darkness not only faster than…
light it is also more naturally occurring than light?
I’ve admittedly made a couple jumps and if you’re reading this you’ve jumped in midway through a conversation I’ve been having with myself, the articles I’m reading and a few other people
If light carries information. Is the uncertainty associated with darkness indicative of the darkness being the natural state of information. Darkness is not the negation of absence of material being carried it becomes the cloak of activity in that it all that would takes place…
Maybe this is my naivety, but am I reading this right? Darkness is still defined as the absence of light? Is there a formula that represents darkness’ physical qualities? Some empirical studies to demonstrate it is only the absence of light?
Please help. This is a real question
Does anyone know of any reputable sources that talk about higher dimensions in M-theory? Specifically the sixth through eleventh dimensions?
I need sources that describe their properties without falling squarely into formulaic speech.