There is zero reason why these barely sentient dead-eyed creatures should be here, and it's precisely this that will lead to more of what we saw in Belfast. There will come a critical mass where streets aren't safe anywhere. This is why we will see more riots. Nobody consented to this, and people simply aren't going to put up with it. If the state doesn't remove them, the white British underclass almost certainly will - by whatever means is the most expedient.
While cosseted public sector workers turn up to anti-racism demos, even they would cross the street to avoid these African men because on an instinctive level they recognise danger, but have been so comprehensively indoctrinated, they think it's a virtue to simply tolerate it. I suppose a public sector pension is a good reason to self-censor, but that does explain the obvious class disparity between the different protest groups we've seen around Britain today. There is very much a class war element to this. The division is between those who suck on the pubic sector teat and those who do not.
Of course, we know that not all Africans are like this, but having abolished anything resembling selectivity in our immigration policy, Britain is now a free for all, where even small rural towns are now dangerous because of immigration, and it could be any one of us, particularly women, having to run the gauntlet to evade intellectually subnormal sexually aggressive third-worlders. It was bad enough having to put up with Pakistani rape gangs, but this is what pushes Britain into low-grade civil war.
The left would have it that this is a consequence of cuts to mental health services, but we shouldn't have to make additional provisions available to deal with what is now a common sight on British streets. You're just as likely to see it in Cheltenham and York as you are in London, Bradford and Manchester. There is nothing these men can contribute to the country. All we can do is either lock them up in asylums, or leave them on the street, just waiting for them to rape, murder or maim someone. We shouldn't have to live this way, but the powers that be have decided we must, for what reason, god only knows. As such, migrants of this type must be considered a bioweapon deployed against the people. The rest are just here as cheap replacement labour.
As such, the "racism" we see, is not racism. Rather it is a wholly rational response to hostile government policies which are a direct threat to our safety and security. Forcing settled people to compete with transient workers with little or no overheads is immoral. We will now see tactical racism as a means to create the hostile environment that the state will not - precisely because politicians ignore our votes. Ethnic solidarity is an instinctive defence mechanism, and we can't be surprised native Britons are now seeing the necessity for it. It's branded as racism because it's the one thing the establishment fears the most. I have more trust in that than I do the democratic process.
Meanwhile, further evidence of why so many patriots took to the streets today to demand REMIGRATION
This nightmare is loose somewhere in MANCHESTER