Joined January 2026
- Tweets 627
- Following 18
- Followers 19
- Likes 114
96 Photos and videos
insideNIAID retweeted
Jun 5
As always @philippmarkolin.bsky.social bangs the nail exactly on the head. Scientists are being used as political tools, prosecuted w/ full hyped-up horror for minor administrative issues while US global leadership in science & health is being rapidly demolished.
open.substack.com/pub/protag…
2
9
21
962
May 31
Quay’s brain is so totally cooked and he’s publishing lame AI info graphics every day to try to win clout… now some AI hallucinated analysis as wisdom… something so obvious it got the account nuked.
Concerning for $ATOS @atossainc
May 30
Replication of methods and analysis is a powerful tool in finding truth.
1
1
245
May 28
“Titles of nobility don’t confer the same ability to bulldoze your way into scientific journals that they apparently do in The Telegraph.”
the-gallop.com/review-matt-r…
May 26
A bloke who boasts about his degrees in both his twitter handle and his bio accuses me of “leveraging my posh origins”.
That’s Projection.
Note he makes zero scientific arguments alongside his ad homs.
1
175
May 22
Refreshing to see the lab leak theory put into the list in which it belongs.
May 22
Based on @C__Herridge's reporting & our CIA whistleblower's testimony, the CIA appears to be ILLEGALLY SPYING on @DNIGabbard's team, INTERFERING w/ investigations on the COVID coverup, the JFK, MLK, & RFK assassinations, UAPs, etc.
We've got to get to the bottom of what they're hiding.
1
3
6
796
May 20
All that work between Erdman and Senators Paul and Johnson to patch over the things (probably) Erdman made up, and how Paul is going back to the false 2023 whistleblower claims, throwing @Jerdman2005 under the bus.
Fauci walked into a CIA briefing in 2020 and overrode six out of seven scientists who said COVID came from a Wuhan lab. This isn't a conspiracy. It's a convergence of interests. They funded gain-of-function research. The virus leaked. So they covered their tracks. @MattKibbe
163
May 14
Why is Rep Luna apologizing when Sen Paul and Sen Johnson are the ones that brought that dude into the spotlight to confuse the hell out of everyone by claiming to say something while saying nothing at all?
May 14
I am noticing a few large accounts stating falsely that I claimed there was a raid on Tulsi Gabbard’s office by the CIA. This is completely false. There is no clip or statement that exists. Why is there an orchestrated push for this narrative? Not one account can post a clip of me saying that cause it never happened. When Congress is notified of conflicting narratives from different agencies, i.e., the CIA and ODNI, it is our job to follow through to ensure documents are preserved and not destroyed. This is not an issue with Ratcliffe or Gabbard. For people to act like the CIA doesn’t have a history of destroying documents is BIZARO-WORLD.
Watch the clip for yourself. I am talking about what the whistleblower is saying under oath.
1
1
121
May 14
The @RepBradWenstrup committee already figured out the dude was making stuff up, so his claims didn’t make their report.
Of course if you put him in the spotlight, people will assume he said something important and misinterpret what he says!
1
1
51
May 14
If I am wrong and @Jerdman2005 wasn’t involved with the House select subcommittee, he can say so.
1
44
May 7
You’re guilty of a fallacy in understanding conspiracy theories.
There’s *always* a way that new information can be twisted to support the theory.
And it’s just a failure of creativity that no one’s figured it out yet.
As @insideniaid said, this has been known for years. Even though this is a prior for you, new information will not shift your conclusion because you are a conspiracist. Nevertheless, I'll try to be helpful to you. threadreaderapp.com/thread/1…
1
1
170
May 7
No reason to assume... protagonist-science.medium.c…
Presumably, a more complete study that ended up as this: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article…
1
245
May 7
Can't reply to you in the thread because that very serious lab leak journalist blocked me for some reason.
The details are quite well known and described in a few places... not surprised you don't know since lab leak folks tend to move on when conspiracy theories are disproven.
May 6
That's a long time to keep under embargo for an upcoming paper, but consistent with what I said about not wanting others to know about a new clade there were working on. Do you have more details about the planned paper ?
1
1
206
May 5
Putting the moron in Angel Moroni by generating the easiest subject in the world to capture in reality and deciding to run with this imagery.
May 5
What belongs in every hotel room in a pluralistic world?
I proposed an answer—and a path forward for Marriott.
jamiemetzl.com/what-belongs-…
97
Apr 2
If this were classified information, @ayjchan couldn’t say this much. If she is allowed to say this much, she could give more details.
Ergo, she doesn’t give any more details because the details ruin the story.
Apr 2
I have full confidence those 3 researchers were sick in Nov and that there is intel on Zhou Yusen's premature death.
5
4
11
1,560
Mar 29
Then why not revisit this story and considered why you were tricked by an investigation premised on secret Chinese and full of obvious errors of fact?
Mar 29
Yes, the lab leak theory turned out to almost certainly false.
1
1
7
572
Mar 25
Is @Ayjchan writing it out of history that Andrew Dobson showed up and made this case?
Mar 24
In 2024, USF invited me to present the lab leak hypothesis and invited numerous zoonosis proponents to present their hypothesis - none of them accepted. It wasn't a debate and many of the hosts were great admirers and colleagues of the natural origin scientists.
1
2
628