Thank you for properly recognizing my heroic sacrifice of being so unfairly blessed.

RT @lunwi75: Remember when Musk challenged the World Food Program to explain how he could solve world hunger with just $6 billion, they did…

literally a psychological manipulation tactic used in some situations where sex becomes a currency, intimacy is being demanded from the partner, submission to it with no expectation of a reward is expected & breadcrumbs are given.. boundaries are good but if u reach a point where ur spending more time trying to figure out what would or wouldn't be acceptable to someone you're supposed to be intimate with, you're not really getting the point of intimacy nor being intimate.

If you can’t tax billionaires and trillionaire because “its unrealized gains until they cash out,” then stop letting them leverage that wealth for loans, as collateral, or as equity. If it’s not real enough to tax, it shouldn’t be real enough to leverage. This is why we say the system is rigged in favor of the super wealthy. Abolish billionaires, tax them out of existence, protect working people.

HOW ARE **YOU** NOT GETTING TURNED ON WHY DID YOU TIE YOURSELF UP TO A MAN YOU CAN SOMEHOW MAKE OUT WITH EVERY NIGHT BUT GET SO SELDOMLY TURNED ON IT BECOMES A CONCERN IF HE DOES WHAT ARE YOU DOING

Yall. The hot autistic leftist giants are arming themselves. So metal.

People only hate Elon Musk because he comes from an emerald mining fortune made in apartheid South Africa, he buys ideas and pretends he’s an inventor, he’s a white supremacist, union-busting, abusive employer, he’s hoarding $1T in stolen wages, he makes us ashamed to be human,

If you think “Elon doesn’t have one trillion dollars just in a bank account, it’s stocks, dummy” is some kind of justification for wealth disparity, and not just transparently a tax optimization strategy, you are extremely dumb.

in nature if a monkey hoarded 1 trillion bananas the other monkeys would beat that monkey to death and take his bananas

a few years ago my friend and I were both single, and we had a conversation about “elevating dating to an art form” it started out mostly joking but eventually a clear picture emerged: we would strive to make the experience as beautiful as possible for the other person that meant clear communication, exceptional effort & presence, and, if things weren’t a match, letting them down in a gentle, honest way it was successful (both of us are now in relationships) but also it made dating fun again. it made it a creative pursuit - how do I create something beautiful here - and dispelled any fatigue or disillusionment

never forget

SpaceX prospectus is the most monorail salesman shit of all time

COME AND TAKE IT @realDonaldTrump

Elon Musk just became the world's first trillionaire. The typical American household would have to work more than 11 MILLION years to make Elon Musk's level of wealth. We need a wealth tax.

2026

Here's the question

I'm 6'0", the most uninterestingly convenient height.

It remains very surprising to me that sex-negativity has made such a come* back in the last few decades. Like, if just being alone after an orgasm is so demoralizing, if your own company is so unpleasant, maybe that's a skill issue to work on. * lol

At the risk of sounding like a self-satisfied asshole, once I took the LSAT and realized “oh wait people score very low on this” it was like a skeleton key for realizing why Twitter is the way it

Americans love cars because they combine their two favorite things: sitting down and killing people

Claude Fable 5 doesn’t truly understand. And here is a beautiful proof: The Beninatto-Trombetti test is a translation test for professional translators. It measures the ability to infer context, revise the surface form, and generalize beyond literal mapping. For example, the correct translation of: “Solo 3 parole: non sei solo” is not: “Just 3 words: you are not alone” but: “Just 4 words: you are not alone.” An LLM that understands the sentence must also update the meta-linguistic claim inside the sentence. Claude Fable 5 is arguably the most advanced LLM currently available. And yet it still fails this simple test. LLMs are extraordinary machines for recombining existing knowledge. But they don’t truly understand. We are still far from AGI.