Molecular Evolutionary Biologist. Associate Professor of Biology @UIowa (all opinions my own; RTs not endorsements) I study sex & occasionally rouse some rabble

Joined December 2008
1,400 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
I opened an account at the other place @johnlogsdon.bsky.social I’m gonna stay here for a while at least. But I’m covering my bases.
3
2
2
419
John Logsdon retweeted
Please join us in wishing Bryan Ferry a very happy birthday today! #bryanferry #happybirthday #onthisday
177
254
2,082
53,727
John Logsdon retweeted
The only rule in biology is that there are exceptions to every rule. This is what makes biology infinitely exciting; even when you think you’ve got the complete view, the floor can drop out from underneath you at any given moment. Case-in-point: The nucleus is the thing that makes eukaryotes...well, eukaryotes. It's the part of the cell that stores the genome, separating DNA from the cytoplasm and other organelles. (Bacteria do not have nuclei.) For decades, scientists thought that each nucleus contains one or more haploid sets of chromosomes. But there are exceptions. Red blood cells, for example, don’t have nuclei at all. (They expel their nuclei during maturation to maximize hemoglobin concentrations.) Cells in the eye lens, too, lose their nuclei and organelles during differentiation, thus becoming transparent. And so on. But now there is yet ANOTHER exception to this rule, and it’s one I hadn’t seen before. For a study in Science, researchers discovered that two types of pathogenic fungi that infect plants, called Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Botrytis cinerea, have two different nuclei. And instead of storing a full set of chromosomes in each nuclei, they instead “distribute their chromosomes such that each of their nuclei contains only a subset of the haploid chromosomes.” The authors confirmed this by throwing a kitchen sink of methods at these cells; chromosome counting, DNA measurements using flow cytometry, single-nucleus PCR, and more. Nobody knows why the fungi do this, but the scientists claim (in their discussion) that it could enable them "to respond and adapt more effectively to local environmental stresses within their extensive mycelial networks. Nuclear shuffling may facilitate the rapid generation of new genotypes, enhancing adaptability to changing environments.” There is also evidence that the chromosomes within each nucleus may briefly collide during cell division, before going back into their separate nuclei. This is a great paper. It is simple, to the point, and challenges the status quo. It has serious potential to become a “classic” of the genre. Link: science.org/doi/10.1126/scie…
26
268
1,171
89,770
20 hours later and your voice mail box is still full. Do your job @SenJoniErnst and at least pretend to listen to your constituents. @joniernst
Hello @SenJoniErnst Constituent here. I unsuccessfully tried to leave you a message today on your voice mailbox. 202 224 3254. It was full.
1
220
Hello @SenJoniErnst Constituent here. I unsuccessfully tried to leave you a message today on your voice mailbox. 202 224 3254. It was full.
152
Hello @SenJoniErnst Constituent here. I unsuccessfully tried to leave you a message today on your voice mailbox. 202 224 3254. It was full.
462
John Logsdon retweeted
New paper out in @ScienceMagazine! In 8 studies (multiple platforms, methods, time periods) we find: misinformation evokes more outrage than trustworthy news, when it does it's shared more ppl are less likely to read before sharing. w/ @killianmcl1 @Klonick @mollycrockett 🧵👇
11
162
400
64,035
I teach a large (~600 students) lecture class on Introductory Biology. Friday is “concert t-shirt day”. I wear one of my (many) band shirts and ask students to wear theirs and tell me about it. Psychedelic Furs was last Friday. Tomorrow?
Question of the day.....
3
297
I opened an account at the other place @johnlogsdon.bsky.social I’m gonna stay here for a while at least. But I’m covering my bases.
3
2
2
419
Wow. The other place is really good. Most of the good #sciencetwitter crowd there, along with a lot of others. Moving out of here will be easier than I thought.
127
John Logsdon retweeted
Our seminar this week will be led by Eric Lai, PhD, from the Developmental Biology Program at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The seminar will begin at 3:30pm on Friday, November 15, in Kollros Auditorium (BBE101). All are welcome to attend. We hope to see you there!
1
260
I don’t know the source/ veracity of this. But if true, it’s shocking.
2
489

I made this graph. I must update it
165
This one seems like the right one, right now. @Neilyoung #NowPlaying #johnsvinyl
1
2
191
Next up on my @Neilyoung listening day. #NowPlaying #johnsvinyl
1
1
135
Zappa was right.
1
143
Inspired by @graychid to dig into some @Neilyoung in #johnsvinyl today. #nowplaying
2
4
413
I picked this one up for @recordstoreday and then somehow shelved it without playing. Fu##in’Up . Well, I’m sure enjoying it now! @Neilyoung #NowPIaying #johnsvinyl
1
1
1
172
Inner sleeves of Fu##in’Up are great. @Neilyoung
1
1
124
John Logsdon retweeted
8 Nov 2024
Gonna be a long four years huh Bert?
194
5,831
63,279
2,317,910
John Logsdon retweeted
Warren wants no sleep til Jan. 3: "Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer must use every minute of the end-of-year legislative session to confirm federal judges and key regulators—none of whom can be removed by the next President" time.com/collection/time100-…

576
6,588
34,453
2,159,282