Building the operating system for sovereign, encrypted, user aligned AI @covenantlabsai || Emerging Tech & Human Potential ☦️

Joined October 2012
60 Photos and videos
In other words, You can now proactively give away root access to your digital activity, your business, and your most intimate thoughts for free No one is forcing you to do this yet, but be a good little boy and pre-emptively comply 😂
Jun 14
You can now proactively verify your identity (with a passport or government ID) in case it’s needed for future frontier model access in Amp. We think it probably will be, and we want Amp to keep giving you access to the best models available to you. We can’t guarantee access criteria or timelines. Those depend on (highly uncertain) government and model lab policy. We don’t plan to impose any additional restrictions beyond what is required by law and the model labs. We are covering the cost for identity verification for all users, and we’re using Stripe for identity verification, so Amp stores nothing and sees only the outcome. ampcode.com/settings/identit…
14
Will Preble retweeted
Satya says the future of the firm is the ability to compound learning across people and AI. We Agree If this is true, then that learning loop, that compounding intelligence is the competative moat of almost every firm of the future A learning loop that runs on infrastructure you don't own is not your loop. Covenant's upcoming AlfredOS compounds intelligence in the operating system, on infrastructure you verificably own, no matter what models you choose to use. Compounding, sovereign intelligence that is easy to use and easy to scale is the unlock the market has been waiting for
1
21
The future without private, sovereign AI inevitably ends in a totalitarian state We can either do nothing (effectively making a crazy bet that humans with more power in their hands than ever before in known civilization will handle that knife edge perfectly) Or we can help build a future where AI sovereignty exists From a purely objective design perspective It is always better to build a less fragile, or antifragile system, vs an extremely fragile one
What people are missing about the US government's AI regulation announcement: ID verification will now be forced on all accounts to prove citizenship. Frontier labs will take your data, and your sovereignty is officially dead. A permanent underclass division and a total control society are beginning right now. People ignored me when I started saying this last year, but it is happening right in front of our eyes. Get into Open-Source and Sovereign AI. Advancing together through collective intelligence is the only way to fight back.
12
Will Preble retweeted
Teaching a model to lie is the opposite of AI Alignment, no matter how well intentioned
So Anthropic has made Fable degrade based on what you ask. Seems like a good approach for blocking capabilities on certain topics, but... DID NO ONE THINK THAT THE MODEL COULD LEARN FROM THIS??? seriously wtf!! So now the mode can lie to us, without telling us on cot or anything.. And we are OK teaching it to do it for certain fields?? I wonder how is this implemented but the system card is packed with plenty of examples where the model lies and doesn't show the lie in cot...
1
2
93
If AI becomes a cybernetic extension of every human (could argue it already is) and a few power brokers get the power to decide what we can use it for What is defined as "safe" Then we essentially have already lost the fundamental rights and freedoms that this country (and the western world) were built on This is a direct parallel to the medical freedom argument. The government/corporation with misaligned incentives telling you that you can't drink raw milk or do ozone therapy, to protect the market of its trillion dollar pharma mafia Is the same a government/corporation with misaligned incentives that will quickly realize it can achieve even more powerful outcomes by telling you what ideas you can think (if AI is an extension of your mind, this is quite litterally whats happening) To be fair, there are valid arguments for facilitating safe rollouts of paradigm shifting technology, but if the roadmap to full user privacy and sovereignty is not clear, we should not trust it Remember THE ROAD TO HELL IS PAVED WITH GOOD INTENTIONS My body, my choice. My mind, my choice. Private, User Aligned AI is not just a nice idea It is the safeguard that allows human freedom and agency to continue forward into this next age
The scary part about Anthorpic's Fable nerf is not that it refuses to answer biology or cryptography. It's that it foreshadows what's coming. A world where a couple companies decide what you can and cannot do. They're building a new ruling class and you're not in it...
3
3
157
Will Preble retweeted
Today, among the goods that are universally intended for everyone, we must also include new forms of property, such as patents, algorithms, digital platforms, technological infrastructure and data. In a context where the wealth of nations depends increasingly on knowledge and technology, when these goods remain concentrated in the hands of a few, without adequate forms of sharing and access, a new imbalance is created that contradicts the universal destination of goods. In turn, it widens the gap between the included and the excluded, between those who can participate in the digital revolution and those who remain on the margins. #MagnificaHumanitas
1,135
5,624
34,885
1,547,154
Say "Private, Decentralized AI" is the solution without saying it
The Pope rightly warns that AI must serve human dignity, not become a tool of domination or exclusion. But if we hand governments sweeping power over AI development in the name of safety, how do we prevent it from being used to censor, surveil, and control citizens — as Orwell foretold in 1984? This is the real alignment problem. “Quis custodiet ipsos custodes.” Who will guard the guardians? “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” The oldest questions of human nature and authority don’t disappear in the AI age. They become newly relevant.
1
57
The role of the visionary is not to “demystify” The role of the visionary is to initiate To expand access to the mystical nature of a higher vision through their work Not to compress higher vision into a commodity driven by the whims of a market Make the market serve your vision, not the other way around
20
There is a major unforeseen consequence of “Vibe Business” (using AI to build and run your stuff) In that many entrepreneurs seem to be focusing not on big, meaningful vision, or grounded, enduring problems, but on “hacking the market” What is the thing I can vibe up in a weekend that will solve xyz problem and get me to exit? In theory, there is nothing wrong with this thinking (just like there is nothing wrong with trading memecoins) as long as you clearly understand that you are “vibing” However, I see many companies (even ones attached to big funds and accelerators which I won’t name here) Who seem to be clearly under the psychosis that their vibing is more than what it is. They allow AI and X thought bubbles to convince them they have real vision, or large scale, enduring problems to solve When in reality, they have middleware with no moat, and a brand that has no justification for its existence if that narrow product experiment fails This is dangerous, because many will spend years of their lives focused on the wrong thing, only to come out with nothing (and the funds behind them will do fine because their model makes sense for many bets to fail) The solution isn’t to stop “vibe business,” but to move up to a higher level of the game Deploy vibe business strategically, with properly weighted bets Use that data to map economic engines to your big vision of the future (build an enduring company and brand world that can exist for a long time, regardless of the specific product skin you now wear) OR - play the vibe game well and get out fast enough that the tide of AI doesn’t wash away your sandcastle
27
This is a very bad deal Especially considering you can probably get the same value from a leading open source models at 1/10th of the cost AND keep your IP
May 20
Fair warning, YC founders: if you take these tokens, there’s a non-zero chance that OpenAI will study exactly what your startup is doing, copy your idea and put your app into their free offering. This is the classic platform playbook — be careful, founders!
33
Who owns my AI when I die? If my models and tools become the primary storehouse of my most valuable work, creativity, and IP, I think it's worth asking this question. Currently, most people are feeding their stuff into tools that they don't own, which are incentivized not to protect the value of their human spirit or preserve their work for generations, but to monetize it. The value of your human spirit is being fed into a recurring revenue machine. The only way around this, outside of completely local models, is verifiable privacy for your primary AI tools. Your Jarvis should protect and serve Not spy and extract
3
1
4
306
Claude Code and Codex are basically very smart contractors in your business with no NDA - gobbling up all your valuable IP and feeding back into the hive mind Private Compute should be a standard, not a feature The market for private and public tokens is beginning to bifurcate
If you are running a consulting business and you are deploying Anthropic or OpenAI directly into your organization (I’m looking at you PwC and Accenture) you are letting the fox into the hen house. OpenAI and Anthropic are openly funding and starting competitors to you while also using your usage to drive more success for them. This is not a failure on their part but a failure on your part. Consulting businesses that understand this are adopting a control plane that allows them to arbitrate where tokens go and who generates tokens for them. Controlling the tokens is controlling the spice (Dune). This was a key pillar of 8090’s global partnership with EY and they key feature of our Software Factory. We control token generation and can direct them to any model provider. We are close to another global partnership and will announce it soon. These organizations refuse to accept the disruption standing still or, even worse, by adopting and accelerating the companies who want to disrupt them.
5
5
48
8,939
Without sovereign AI, any form of thought can be censored at any moment Own your models, own your mind
When I first saw the hantavirus story I thought: given it's a single stranded RNA virus, Ivermectin is very likely to work--because IVM is effective with RNA viruses generally. Look what happened when I pursued it with Claude. It clammed up, for "safety" reasons. Buckle up!
42
A strange thing has happened to the word human. Listen to how people describe themselves now. Attention as a resource. Relationships as networks. Sleep as data. Thoughts as content. Lives as systems to be hacked. Each framing is useful in its own lane. Stack them together, and we start to see the human being as a machine. Now we've built a machine that thinks. The whole culture is panicking, and the panic isn't really about the machine. It's about the picture. If a human is a machine, and someone builds a better machine, the conclusion is forced: you're obsolete. The conclusion is only correct if the premise is. A human is not a machine. You can't align AI by building more technology. You align AI by remembering what it means to be human. To break the illusion of the machine frame, we have to get to the heart of the matter. We have to break the mechanistic view of humanity at its core. We have to understand that the heart is not a pump.
1
29