Host #AmAgenda 9-11am weekdays @skynewsaust

Joined December 2008
851 Photos and videos
Laura Jayes retweeted
Replying to @ljayes
@ljayes Matt Cunningham is a class act and you can clearly see his love and frustrations with the NT. No other journo reporting on the NT like him. @SkyNewsAust
3
3
11
1,184
Laura Jayes retweeted
TRAGIC CASE HIGHLIGHTS A NATIONAL DISGRACE The death of five-year-old Sharon Granites has had a profound impact on families across the Northern Territory and beyond. Like many Australians, I am devastated by the news that she has been found dead, and my thoughts are with her family and loved ones. As more details emerge, the focus must remain on supporting Sharon’s family and the work of authorities. (The name Sharon Granites is used in this article to ensure she is not reduced to a statistic. When speaking of her, I will call her Kumanjayi Little Baby in appropriate cultural settings.) Alongside that grief sits a question that cannot be ignored. How did this happen? It is a question that demands honesty. For too long, there has been a reluctance to speak plainly about the conditions in and around town camps. In reality, too many have become environments where safety is not guaranteed, particularly for children. There is constant movement. People coming and going. Individuals with long criminal histories moving in and out. Alcohol restrictions that exist on paper but are not enforced in practice. Overcrowding. Poor maintenance. Limited oversight. These are not new observations. The town camp now at the centre of this case is one I know well. It is a place where I have lost family. A niece was stabbed to death there. Another child in my extended family was killed in an accident at the front of that same camp. There have been too many lives lost in that place alone. And yet, these conditions persist. We know from Closing the Gap data that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women and children remain among the most vulnerable in the country. The Northern Territory continues to experience the highest domestic and family violence rates in the country. Approximately 100 women have been killed by intimate partners over the past 25 years. In 2024, seven of the nine homicide victims in the Territory were linked to domestic and family violence. These are not just statistics. They are indicators of risk. That risk too often goes unaddressed. Despite this, billions of dollars continue to flow through Indigenous organisations, land councils and local governance structures, yet the conditions on the ground tell a different story. The question is whether those outcomes are being delivered in practice. Where town camps remain unsafe and vulnerable people are exposed to harm, accountability is unavoidable. Pointing to funding levels is not enough. Nor is pointing to programs. What matters is that those investments are translating into safer lives. In too many cases, the answer is no. There has been a longstanding call for greater scrutiny. For an examination of how resources are allocated, how decisions are made, and whether those responsible for delivering outcomes are being held to account. I have raised these issues in Parliament. I have called for greater scrutiny of how funding is being used and for stronger action to protect vulnerable women and children. I have called for a broader inquiry into violence in our communities. This moment demands that they are not ignored any longer. An independent inquiry must now be on the table. Not only into the circumstances surrounding this case, but into the broader conditions that allow such vulnerability to persist. That includes the governance of town camps, the role of organisations responsible for their upkeep, and whether current laws and enforcement mechanisms are adequate to protect the most vulnerable. Because if they are not, they must change. Too often, difficult conversations are avoided. There is a reluctance to speak plainly about what is happening in some communities. Silence does not protect anyone, including women, children and families such as Sharon’s. We cannot continue to accept a situation where environments of known risk remain unchanged. Where warning signs are visible, but action is delayed. Where funding is substantial, but outcomes fall short. We have the resources. We have the knowledge. What is lacking is the willingness to insist on accountability and to follow through with meaningful reform. Sharon Granites is not a statistic. She is a little girl, part of a family, part of a community and part of this nation. Her death has forced a spotlight onto long-standing issues. The question now is whether we will respond to that reality. Not with rhetoric. Not with temporary measures. But with the seriousness it demands. Because until we do, the same question will continue to be asked. How did this happen? And why, when the risks were clear, did we allow them to remain?
208
343
1,486
39,059
Laura Jayes retweeted
What’s really sad is Punters Politics and the Greens KNOW FULL WELL most people don’t understand basic business stuff like this. And this is how leftists take over countries with easy slogans and cool sounding populist PR campaigns like “the rich gas corporations are stealing from us!” For once I think we can applaud the major parties for not caving-in to the populism. But it probably won’t last. @ljayes @ellymelly @OzInstProgress @AusPoll6 @DrewPavlou @TopherField @OzraeliAvi @EnergyWrapAU
10
23
73
2,242
Laura Jayes retweeted
The discipline of @piersmorgan to just sit there silently for the excruciating 90 seconds of page turning without interjecting at all…props
Piers Morgan asked Russell Brand which passages were relevant to him when he brought a Bible into court.
480
2,109
32,433
1,404,421
Laura Jayes retweeted
Apr 18
Absolutely outrageous from Gout Gout. 10.04 at the age of 16. Speechless.
420
1,510
22,936
8,995,364
Laura Jayes retweeted
International Energy Agency chief says that Europe has 'maybe six weeks' of jet fuel left, says current shock is 'the largest energy crisis we have ever faced', according to AP report.
201
1,209
5,740
532,484
Laura Jayes retweeted
A series of disjointed, hard-to-follow and sometimes-profane comments capped by threatening to wipe out Iran and attacking the pope have left many with the impression of a deranged autocrat mad with power and revived the debate about Trump's mental health. nytimes.com/2026/04/13/us/po…
555
2,759
7,485
1,016,542
Laura Jayes retweeted
18-year-old GOUT GOUT 🇦🇺 19.67s (1.7) over 200m at Australian Championships in Sydney!!🤯🤯 A new U20 World Record ☑️ National Record ☑️ First Australian man under 20 seconds ☑️ A star is born!

1,071
4,735
42,869
6,291,152
Laura Jayes retweeted
There is a fog in diplomacy as of war, but a few things stand out after the ceasefire announcement: 1. This may not be the end but it’s at least the beginning of the end. Trump’s bluster might have opened the Strait of Hormuz and ultimately avoided catastrophic attacks on Iran’s civilian infrastructure. Two weeks give the sides a chance to lock in a peace deal. But it may not be a good agreement. 2. Already, Iran says that ships can pass the Strait “via coordination with Iran’s Armed Forces.” That means that Tehran controls access, which was not the case before the war. It’s hard to see how the United States – or the world – can accept indefinite Iranian control of such a key energy chokepoint. 3. Trump says Iran’s 10 point plan is a workable basis for negotiation. But that plan includes Iranian control of the Strait, accepting Iran’s right to enrich uranium, lifting all sanctions, no attacks on proxies like Hezbollah, paying reparations, and the withdrawal of US combat forces from the Middle East. It's a regime wishlist. 4. Iran remains in possession of its stock of highly enriched uranium, which the President says can be monitored effectively by satellite. If that was sufficient to prevent its misuse, however, it’s not clear why attacking Iran was necessary in the first place. 5. The real threat was Iran’s growing stockpile of missiles and drones, which it would eventually have in such quantities as to overwhelm any reasonable regional defenses. Behind that umbrella, Tehran could pursued its malign aims, including on the nuclear front. So if there was a casus belli, it was to degrade those programs. 6. But the administration’s war aims were broader: no nuclear Iran, no missiles or drones, no navy, no blocking the Strait of Hormuz, no support to proxies, decapitating the leadership and, depending on the day, overthrowing the regime. 7. Instead the regime remains in place, with nuclear material, and with degraded forces that still allow it to menace neighbors and block the Strait. If Tehran gets a decent proportion of its desired 10 points, we may face a materially worse situation than when this all started. 8. That's not inevitable, and hopefully that outcome can be avoided. But the negotiators now have tremendous work before them.
47
263
886
533,528
Laura Jayes retweeted
The highest quality video of the moon was just released… this is so beautiful.
5,207
64,710
331,399
11,345,974
Laura Jayes retweeted
If this is ‘3-D Chess’, I’m an Aardvark.
Trump’s “victory timeline” claims. Mar 3: "We won the war." Mar 7: "We defeated Iran." Mar 9: "We must attack Iran." Mar 9: "The war is ending almost completely, and very beautifully." Mar 11: “You never like to say too ⁠early you won. We won. In ​the first hour it was over.” Mar 12: "We did win, but we haven't won completely yet." Mar 13: "We won the war." Mar 14: "Please help us." Mar 15: "If you don't help us, I will certainly remember it." Mar 16: "Actually, we don't need any help at all." Mar 16: "I was just testing to see who's listening to me." Mar 16: "If NATO doesn't help, they will suffer something very bad." Mar 17: "We neither need nor want NATO's help." Mar 17: "I don't need Congressional approval to withdraw from NATO." Mar 18: "Our allies must cooperate in reopening the Strait of Hormuz." Mar 19: "US allies need to get a grip - step up and help open the Strait of Hormuz." Mar 20: "NATO are cowards." Mar 21: "The Strait of Hormuz must be protected by the countries that use it. We don't use it, we don't need to open it." Mar 22: "This is the last time. I will give Iran 48 hours. Open the strait" Mar 22: "Iran is Dead" Mar 23: "We had very good and productive talks with Iran." Mar 24: "We’re making progress." Mar 25: “They gave us a present and the present arrived today. And it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize.” Mar 26: "Make a deal, or we’ll just keep blowing them away." Mar 27: "We don’t have to be there for NATO." Mar 28: No major quote Mar 29: Claimed talks were progressing Mar 30: "Open the Strait of Hormuz immediately, or face devastating consequences." Mar 31: Claimed a deal was "very close" and that Iran would "do the right thing" Apr 1: "We’ll see what happens very soon." Apr 2: Repeated that a deal was likely, while warning of continued strikes if not Apr 3: "Something big is going to happen." Apr 4: Said Iran must comply "immediately" or face further consequences. Apr 5: "Open the fuckin' Strait, you crazy bastards, or you'll be living in Hell - JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah." 😂
299
304
2,853
736,116
I did not know it was $1.7B! Wild
@ljayes Love your work on Skynews, here is details from Grok on the $1.7b to Iran: es, Trump's reference to the Obama administration flying $1.7 billion in cash to Iran is essentially accurate in its core details, though the full $1.7 billion figure combines multiple transfers and the payments were in foreign currencies (euros, Swiss francs, and others), not U.S. dollars. Background and Details This was not a direct "gift" under the 2015 Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA). It settled a decades-old legal claim at the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal in The Hague. Before the 1979 Iranian Revolution, Iran paid the U.S. about $400 million for military equipment that was never delivered after the Shah was overthrown. Iran pursued the claim (principal plus interest) for years. The Obama administration negotiated a settlement for $1.7 billion total: the original ~$400 million principal plus ~$1.3 billion in negotiated interest (far less than what a full tribunal ruling might have awarded). Timing: The first installment of $400 million (in foreign cash on wooden pallets) was delivered on January 17, 2016—the same day Iran released four American prisoners (including journalist Jason Rezaian) as part of a separate prisoner swap. The Obama administration initially described the events as coincidental but later acknowledged using the payment timing as "leverage" to ensure the prisoners' safe release. Subsequent payments: The remaining $1.3 billion was sent in additional cash installments in late January and early February 2016. Why cash? U.S. sanctions isolated Iran from the international banking system, making wire transfers difficult or unreliable. Officials said cash (procured via central banks in Switzerland and the Netherlands, then converted) ensured immediate, guaranteed delivery as required by the settlement. No U.S. dollars were used, to comply with sanctions rules.
10
1
6
5,153
Laura Jayes retweeted
I do not believe for a second that our military targeted an elementary school. But if an errant American missile accidentally killed a building filled with children, we should take responsibility for it, not sweep it under the rug. nytimes.com/2026/03/08/world… via @NYTimes
2,682
613
3,860
578,495
Laura Jayes retweeted
If true, this is horrific news--and the U.S. military will have to address this publicly. Proximity of military compound obviously a factor, but our weapons also have pinpoint accuracy. NEW: Investigators think American forces were likely responsible for an airstrike on a girls’ elementary school that killed dozens of children in Iran, a U.S. official said wsj.com/world/middle-east/ir… via @WSJ
4,410
1,539
8,416
1,865,274
Laura Jayes retweeted
A rather scary read... and a repeat of what we saw in Gaza. "As planning for a potential strike in Iran was underway, Maven, powered by Claude, suggested hundreds of targets, issued precise location coordinates, and prioritized those targets according to importance, said two of the people. The pairing of Maven and Claude has created a tool that is speeding the pace of the campaign, reducing Iran’s ability to counterstrike and turning weeks-long battle planning into real-time operations, said one of the people. The AI tools also evaluate a strike after it is initiated, the person said." washingtonpost.com/technolog…
46
635
1,201
208,438
Laura Jayes retweeted
Absolutely wild.
Feb 2025: ChatGPT held 90% of the US business market. Feb 2026: Claude share has surged to ~70%. Absolutely insane growth of Anthropic. Their bet on coding and agents clearly paid off.
2
12
43
12,847
Laura Jayes retweeted
What? So the ‘preemptive threat’ was based on prior knowledge that (presumably) Israel was going to attack Iran? This is nuts.
Mar 2
Rubio: There was absolutely an imminent threat and it was that we knew that if Iran was attacked and we believe that they would be attacked, that they would immediately come after us and we were not going to sit there and absorb a blow
2,785
7,430
37,654
2,145,028
Laura Jayes retweeted
1/ Eighteen hourse since the start of the U.S.–Israel operation against Iran - several insights and new pieces of information. ***The Middle East is still in shock over the assassination of Ali Khamenei, the world’s longest-serving dictator and the architect of the “Axis of Resistance.” Together with other eliminations, this is a strategic blow of historic magnitude - and the first time Israel has killed the head of a sovereign state. In many ways, Israel has sought to restore its deterrence after October 7, once it became clear it had none- not vis-à-vis Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, or the Houthis. The killings of Sinwar, Nasrallah, Khamenei, and Assad’s flight to Moscow are an attempt to rebuild regional deterrence.
9
97
606
187,115