posted Einsteins missing equation 7/11/25 Δt=ℏ/ΔE ↔ ΔE=ℏ/Δt 😳 light/energy absorbed starts time e=t 🕰️ here it is rxiverse.org/pdf/2511.0009v2…

Joined September 2020
1,015 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
If my equation is not Einstein 1 inch missing equation to unify everything take my money prove it wrong. challenge open to anyone please retweet so we can reach @neiltyson @ProfBrianCox @michiokaku @skdh when they see how simple it is they not gonna feel smart anymore 💯 retweet
1
2
215
They will soon realise light absorbed starts time and the uncertainty is broken, it has time in twice 1 as frequency which we use to define time (the second) from cessium atom and 1 as time the clock when they realise e is = to t you remove the stop watch found 2025 e*t=h cnrt
96
They don’t get that the wave they measure in frequency with time is time itself being created when light is absorbed. so they have f frequency and t time in uncertainty equation and they both same thing (time) loool that what it is that they fk up on e*t=h cnrt 2025 1st here 👇
1
108
lol the wave is time you measure the wave against a background clock not realising the wave itself is time 🤣🤣🤣 light absorbed starts time (the wave) no light no exist. Wait till you all see how simple it is when realise that loool more proof 🤣🤷‍♂️
🚨 SCIENTISTS JUST CREATED QUANTUM STATES THAT ONLY EXIST WHILE YOU KEEP SHAKING THE MAGNETIC FIELD. By rapidly switching (or “shaking”) magnetic fields at precise frequencies, researchers have engineered entirely new quantum states of matter that cannot exist under normal, static conditions. These exotic “driven” states appear only while the periodic driving continues the moment the shaking stops, the system relaxes back to normal. Why this matters: • This is Floquet engineering using time-periodic driving to create temporary quantum phases • The states rely on rapid switching of magnetic fields to modulate energy density and stabilize transient spin-wave patterns • They only exist in this “driven” regime and disappear when the driving stops • It opens a new way to explore quantum matter that is impossible in equilibrium The deeper implication is mind-bending: We can now create quantum states that are fundamentally “time-dependent” they only live as long as we keep driving the system. This could lead to switchable quantum materials, new types of quantum sensors, and a better understanding of non-equilibrium quantum physics. What do you think how wild is it that some quantum states only exist while you keep “shaking” the system? Follow for more frontier quantum physics.
2
208
A photon has 0 proper time until it is absorbed the key word ther is UNTIL. When it is absorbed it changes the system absorbing it this change is time literally If it has 0 time when absorbed be no need to say until Making that moment of absorption the start of time for it
101
What do you do when you solved physics last year and this year you just watch award after award going to people saying same shit I did last year lol just people listen to them cause they get paid millions 🤦‍♂️ fking stupid way of lige we live 🤣🤣💯
1
1
113
lol light that kills cancer might suprise some people but was predicted last year by me with formula
🚨 LIGHT THAT KILLS CANCER? Scientists have developed a groundbreaking technique that uses special light-activated molecules to destroy cancer cells with up to 99% success in early laboratory studies. When exposed to a specific wavelength of light, these molecules attack cancer cells from within while leaving healthy cells largely unharmed. This could one day offer a safer alternative to traditional treatments with fewer side effects.While human trials are still needed, the discovery is raising hopes that light itself could become a powerful weapon against cancer. Source:
Rice University, Texas A&M University, & University of Texas. Research on light-activated molecular cancer therapy. Nature Chemistry.
168
Macc uk don’t fake shit wouldn’t post this shit unless I’m 100% right if you know me you know I’m right sounds mad time is light absorbed better deal with it cause that’s what’s up loool look I said uncertainty was fked up speed of light shows this, look x.com/charlesmullins2/status…

When they realise you can complete physics by moving e on uncertainty to the end and make it a certainty? why no 1 ever done this amazes me and even more amazing is when I publish it last year and experimental validation epfl, lhcb,desi this year still no 1 is getting it 🤣🤣🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️
116
If only Elon knew grok already has new physics since last year looool fail Elon fail
Yes
2
152
I hope when the mainstream finally realise that time is the cost of light absorbed e*t=h I hope people will speak up and say macc uk discovered that last year? Is funny cause many people have tried to solve what is time and I smashed it, it is quite simply cost of light absorbed
103
Light absorbed starts time 🕰️ dmt can’t see time so the see the code making time they say they see through the wall on dmt, Bob lazar s4 craft energised he could see through metal craft like a window with alien writing, this is also same code dmt user see craft stop absorb light
🤯❗ INTRIGUANT ! 🚨 Ce mec prétend avoir trouvé une PREUVE RÉPÉTABLE que nous vivons dans une simulation ! Il projette un laser diffracté sur un mur fume du DMT… …et il voit soudain du **code** défiler sur les surfaces. Comme dans Matrix. Plusieurs personnes ont vu exactement la même chose. Il dit : « C’est soit la façon la plus cool de perdre la tête… soit la plus grande découverte de l’histoire de l’humanité. » Regardez jusqu’à la fin.
207
Apparently this straight line the #Pimblottequation makes from yettosecond to age of the universe is a BIG DEAL! the straight line is supposed to be a big deal mainstream missed, loool more evidence I’m right i guess 🤷‍♂️ #pimblottequation e*t=h founded 2025 💡=🕰️ proven 2026 epfl
1
1
194
Spiders build perfect orb webs on their very first try — no learning needed. The geometry is too precise, too efficient to be random. They’re instinctively reading the universal latching grid (the same matrix behind light absorption & time #PimblottEquation e*t=h 💡 = 🕰️
1
107
Worlds leading physicist he claim but can’t work out light absorbed starts time and white light is rbg frequency not white making rainbow 🌈 world leading physicist can’t see or formulate it like me then what do that make me? The real world leading physicist I would say 💯 💪
I appeared on #DOAC (The Diary of a CEO), one of the world's most popular long-form business and self-improvement podcasts, hosted by British entrepreneur @StevenBartlett, a "Dragon" on the @BBC's "Dragons' Den." (America's "Shark Tank" is based on "Dragons' Den"). Watch the intro here and the full in-depth interview on YouTube: youtu.be/opB7_JXL0LA
168

ALT Scared Brad Pitt GIF

101
Light absorbed starts time without light you have 0 time I know this sounds mental but actually is logical, epfl Hugo is proving it in 2026 they don’t even realise it or formulate it e*t=h they just think they found a new way to measure time without realising light making time 🤦‍♂️
101
Crown for the win 2 you not see this player hiding in bushes 💯💪💪 youtube.com/live/MnrlrHdhiG4…

ALT Spartan Look GIF

1
1
107
Check the Macclesfielduk smashing heads in fortshite easy crown win 😂🤣💪💪💯💯🤜🤛 youtube.com/live/uzO5h1ZuwFQ…

ALT Spartan Look GIF

1
1
111
An objects time depends on the light absorbed, bob lazer said uap powered up the hull was transparent and was code this code was the same code dmt users see with red lazer time is a cost of exchange between light and matter so easy how the fk it not solved yet? So frustrating lol
In general relativity, the time an object experiences depends on its acceleration. But time in quantum physics is a universal parameter. Physicists say they want to use a special type of clock to test the difference. youtube.com/watch?v=j5rwokGE…
196
Close @michiokaku it is the leaking of forces blue strong 25% green equal 50% red weak 25% if you understand what trinity means ( 3 sources combine to make 1) you will understand rbg makes white not white making rainbow you don’t need rgbg just right amount of green 50% rbg 🤫
🚨 WHAT IF DARK MATTER IS ACTUALLY ANOTHER UNIVERSE? 🚨 Scientists have spent decades trying to solve one of the biggest mysteries in existence: dark matter. We know something invisible is out there. Galaxies spin so fast they should tear themselves apart. Light bends around galaxy clusters far more than normal matter can explain. Even the structure of the universe itself should collapse without some hidden force holding it together. Yet nobody has ever seen dark matter. No telescope can detect it. No laboratory has captured it. Scientists only know it exists because of the strange gravitational effects it leaves behind. But one theory takes the mystery into terrifying territory. Physicist Michio Kaku has discussed the possibility that dark matter may not be matter at all. According to ideas from string theory and M-theory, our universe could be just one “membrane” floating in a higher-dimensional space. Other universes may exist right beside ours, completely invisible to us. And unlike light or matter, gravity may be able to move between these universes. If that idea is correct, the gravity we blame on dark matter might actually belong to galaxies and stars in a parallel universe. We would feel their gravitational pull without ever seeing the source. Think about that for a moment. Entire galaxies could exist beside us right now… hidden beyond dimensions we cannot access, silently shaping our universe from the shadows. What makes this theory so fascinating is that every other explanation for dark matter still remains unproven. Scientists have searched for dark matter particles for years using underground detectors and massive particle colliders, but the results have come back empty. No confirmed particle. No direct evidence. Only gravity… and questions. The theory remains controversial, and there is still no proof that parallel universes exist. But until science finally discovers what dark matter truly is, the possibility cannot be completely ruled out. And that leaves us with a chilling thought: What if the universe we can see is only half the story?
1
178