@JohnnyDeppNFT @JennieDepp__ @beautifullydamj @JerrieDepp

She’s right - it was pure racism on the part of the Sudanese savage. He didn’t attack another African did he …? No - he attacked an innocent white man, gouged his eyes out and tried to cut his head off! She needs to go before you loose your country Ireland 🇮🇪 ..and fast!!!!

What glue is she sniffing ? Suicidal Empathy. I’m impressed that her invading illegal companions can keep a straight face. I guess they are occupied thinking about finding her in a dimly lit Belfast street .

After hearing this, you really have to ask yourself, "What are these people really after? What is their true motivation?" These people aren't stupid, well except for Starmer and the mayor of Belfast. You have to find out what the real motivation for this is if you want to destroy it.

Unfortunately the Elites and Autocratic leaders are continuing to destroy Nations in the Western world .They keep pushing,(The New World Order), total control of the people and resources for their own use. So they can change everything to fit their plans for the future,to benefit them and their friends. Not the people they should be serving.

Racism was the tragic beheading of a Native Irish here by an absolute low IQ evildoer— not from Ireland. I bet she believes in high taxation without representation (vis EU carbon tax) as well.

Stand up Nothern Ireland

@moneillsf playing your part, a deadly combination of.... It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy. George Orwell, 1984 &

These politicians are not listening to the will of the people. They are not representatives they are tyrants. They are responsible for the rapes, robberies, and murders. They are responsible for this civil unrest. They should be rotting in jail. The people have had enough.

🇬🇧 Northern Ireland's First Minister met with minority interest groups to apologize for the protests in Belfast after a Sudanese immigrant tried to behead someone. She called protests against mass unvetted migration "pure racism." That's right; her advice to people is that they should suffer the threat of being randomly murdered on any given Tuesday in silence, otherwise they're racist. Writer: Mhedi x.com/Liberfach0/status/2065…

Who honestly believes that a distraught family sitting at their butchered son's hospital bedside spontaneously comes out with this woke shit? Ooh let's not ruin the hospitality sector! Once again #KierStarmer is gaslighting us and lazy journos just regurgitate it : "Mr Ogilvie's family said: Peaceful protest is the only way forward. We do not want this terrible tragedy to be used to divide people or fuel hostility. We have many migrants who make a deeply valuable contribution to our country, including in our healthcare system and hospitality sector and we depend on them to make our country work."

The Asylum Backlog Hit 87,450. The Terror Watchdog Warned of a Security Risk 87,450 people are in the asylum appeals backlog. That is roughly the population of Carlisle. Imagine every man, woman and child in that city, waiting in a queue that grows by the day, more than double the number of new asylum claims made in the same year. The numbers published this week should stop a government in its tracks. The backlog is up 71.5 percent in a single year. 70 percent of rejected claimants now appeal. 40 percent of those rejected remain in Britain regardless. Of the more than 200,000 people who have crossed the Channel illegally since 2018, only around 4 percent have ever been removed. The system is not failing to cope with the numbers. The system is the numbers. The Home Office describes this as progress, pointing to a 72 percent fall in the initial decision backlog since 2023. What it does not say is where those decisions went. They went into the appeals system, where the backlog has more than doubled. Speeding up the front door while leaving the back door unchanged relocates the queue and multiplies it, because every rejected claimant who appeals is entitled to taxpayer-funded accommodation while they wait. The National Audit Office puts the total cost at £4.9 billion for 2024-25, with £2.1 billion spent on hotels alone. Shabana Mahmood's response is to legislate again, restricting Article 8 family life claims to immediate family, requiring judges to prioritise public safety, and setting a 28-week limit on appeals. That legislation implicitly admits the current framework has allowed dubious family connections to block removal, that judges have not been prioritising public safety, and that appeals have run indefinitely. These are not new problems Mahmood has discovered. They have been documented for years by anyone willing to look, while those who raised them were told they were exaggerating or that no evidence existed. Then there is Jonathan Hall. Not a commentator. Not an activist. The government's own Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation, a King's Counsel appointed specifically to provide neutral expert assessment of the law. This week, in the aftermath of the Belfast stabbing and the riots that followed, Hall said publicly that immigration must be assessed in national security terms, that certain nationalities present elevated risk profiles for serious violence, and that trauma among asylum seekers from conflict zones may compound that risk further. Foreign nationals accounted for one in seven sexual offence convictions in 2024. Hall is not speculating. He is the most senior independent legal authority on terrorism law in the country, and he has said the system as it stands is a security risk. The government's response to Hall's intervention was silence. He raised it through proper channels. Nobody answered. So here is where Britain stands. An appeals backlog larger than the population of an entire English city, growing at 71.5 percent a year. A removal rate of 4 percent for illegal arrivals. A National Audit Office report confirming the cost is disproportionately high and driven by delay. A Home Secretary legislating to fix problems that amount to an admission the system has been broken in exactly the ways critics described. And a terror watchdog, appointed by the government itself, warning that the entire framework constitutes a national security risk, met with silence from the department responsible for it. This is not a system under strain. It is a system working exactly as designed. Faster removals, restricted appeals, leaving the ECHR, every lever has been available for years and none pulled with urgency. The backlog will keep growing. The removal rate will stay near zero. Somewhere in that queue of 87,450, the next Belfast is already waiting its turn. "In the aftermath of the Belfast stabbing and the riots that followed, Hall said publicly that immigration must be assessed in national security terms"

🚨 A 14-year-old girl went to the police for protection. The detective assigned to her, John Hamilton — in child safeguarding — sent her inappropriate messages. He denied everything. She endured a full trial. Guilty in 2026. The person meant to protect her became the predator.

This absolutely brilliant article by @franticworry is a must read for everyone. The fact hardly anyone will bother to read it is exactly why the desperately needed changes to the entire Criminal Justice System will never happen. empowerinnocent.wixsite.com/… Prove me wrong and for the sake of all the wrongfully imprisoned past and present, read it and lobby your MP to ask them to raise these concerns in Parliament and demand action to radically reform the UK's completely failed justice system. @DavidDavisMP @davidkurten @DavidLammy @sarahsackman @KimJohnsonMP @CommonsJustice @hammersmithandy #JusticeReform #FreeTheInnocent #LucyLetby #JeremyBamber #RobinGarbutt #MiscarriagesOfJustice

#60Mins In 2013, 60 Minutes investigated the silent health risk occurring from contaminated cabin air, and how airlines have been hiding the problem from pilots, crew and passengers for years. youtube.com/watch?v=b_1btM_e…

BEFORE YOU BOARD YOUR NEXT FLIGHT READ THIS A former airline captain named John Hoyte reached out to me recently. He spent nearly 30 years flying commercial aircraft, developed serious neurological damage, lost his career, and has been trying to get this story properly investigated ever since. He sent me documents spanning two decades. The scale of what is in them is HUGE. What he shared includes parliamentary records, a 320-page published report from the British pilots union, @BBC coverage, House of Lords testimony, and active litigation in multiple countries. This has been heard at the highest levels. It has largely been buried. Most commercial jet aircraft use a system called bleed air. Instead of drawing fresh air from outside, the plane takes compressed air directly from the engines and pumps it into the cabin. That is the air you breathe for the entire flight. When engine seals wear down, oil and hydraulic fluid can leak into that air supply. Those fluids contain organophosphates, the same compounds found in certain pesticides and nerve agents. Inhaling them can cause neurological damage, memory loss, and chronic fatigue. In documented cases, far worse. This design has been in use since the 1950s. The health risk has been documented for just as long. In 2005, @BALPApilots, the British pilots union, published a full conference report on this with the University of New South Wales. The following year, 27 BALPA pilots were tested by University College London. All 27 showed evidence of toxic poisoning and reduced cognitive function. Not some of them. All of them. @BBCPanorama covered it in 2008. The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee heard evidence on it in 2007 and 2008. In February 2007, 40 unrelated passengers on a single XL Airways flight were seriously injured by contaminated cabin air. Their cases went to court. Twenty of them won a US jurisdiction ruling in 2010. A UK coroner recorded a death linked to this in 2015. France has formally recognised aerotoxic syndrome as an occupational disease. In the US, a law professor is suing Boeing for $40 million after a single exposure left him permanently injured. Morgan & Morgan, America's largest personal injury firm, is now actively taking mass cases on behalf of passengers and crew. John himself was one of those 27 pilots tested by UCL. He founded the Aerotoxic Association in 2007 at the Houses of Parliament to support other survivors. He has been fighting for this for nearly 20 years. Almost every commercial jet aircraft except the Boeing 787 Dreamliner uses the bleed air system. The 787 uses a different design that avoids this problem entirely. That safer design has existed for years. That fact alone says everything. BBC has not covered this story since 2020. The UK Civil Aviation Authority continues to say there is no positive evidence of a link. The Aerotoxic Association has been contacted by more than 2,500 people who believe they have been affected. John is looking for mainstream investigative journalists who want to dig deep into this. He is an expert witness with decades of evidence and is willing to answer every question. He has a passenger injured on that 2007 flight, Samantha Sabatino, whose case is in the parliamentary record. This is a genuine story of enormous public interest and it deserves proper investigation. If you are a journalist or researcher and want to speak to John directly, his contact details are in the comments. I will add media coverage links in the comments section. Sources: @AerotoxicAssoc (Aerotoxic Association) @BALPApilots (British Airline Pilots Association) @forthepeople (Morgan & Morgan) gcaqe org (Global Cabin Air Quality Executive) @BBCPanorama covered it in 2008 with a full documentary titled Something in the Air. @heraldtweets @WSJ @FlightGlobal @TheCanaryUK @the_ecologist

Did you know that two crewmembers in British Airways were dying on average every mont…. just found dead in their beds? The captain who was grounded who began to investigate this, took it to the powers that be and then was promptly removed from the premises, put And Garden leave and sacked. He noticed when he was working how many crew were actually dying and was looking back. This is kept very quiet. I did almost a decade for British Airways on long haul. This is very real and kept quiet. Radiation counters were placed on the back of the 747 400s, in the early 90s so they could work out how much radiation Crew were exposed to. It was a lot. Now think about the passengers? How many of them suddenly die and found in their bed after travelling and nobody would know what it caused it. There is a lot more to the aviation industry and aerotoxic syndrome is a real one.

Ukrainians Only. Except for the Other 112 Countries. Britain created a visa scheme for Ukrainians fleeing Vladimir Putin's invasion. Nearly 3,500 non-Ukrainian nationals have since entered Britain under a scheme bearing the word Ukrainian on every form, drawn from 112 countries including Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria and Libya (Hymas, C., Tovey, M. and Butcher, B., The Telegraph, 11 April 2026). The Home Office calls this a family reunion provision. The rest of us might call it a border. The national security dimension alone should stop every minister in their tracks. Ken McCallum, head of MI5, has publicly confirmed that ISKP, the Islamic State affiliate operating primarily across Afghanistan and Iran, is the single greatest overseas Islamist terror threat to Britain. The same service tracked over twenty Iran-backed plots on British soil in a single year. These are not abstract warnings issued into a vacuum. They describe the precise countries of origin of people who have just entered the United Kingdom on Ukrainian visas, unvetted, under a scheme never designed to accommodate them. The judicial dimension is, if anything, more alarming. A Palestinian family, living in Egypt and therefore not in immediate danger, successfully argued before an immigration tribunal that their Article 8 right to family life entitled them to enter Britain through a Ukrainian refugee scheme. The Home Office's own lawyers warned the judge this would open the floodgates to anyone in any conflict zone with a relative in the UK. The judge admitted them anyway. Shabana Mahmood overturned the ruling on appeal, which is to her credit. But the architecture that produced the ruling remains entirely intact, ready to be used again by the next applicant with a sufficiently creative lawyer. This is the ECHR operating exactly as its critics have always described. Parliament creates a scheme with a defined purpose and defined eligibility. A judge decides that a broader interpretation of human rights law overrides that purpose. The democratic intent of the legislation is set aside. Ministers are left fighting rearguard actions in appeal courts while the precedent quietly embeds itself in case law. Starmer and his Attorney General Lord Hermer have repeatedly insisted Britain will not leave the ECHR. After today's revelations, they owe the public a precise explanation of how they intend to prevent this happening again without doing so. The broader picture is worse still. Britain currently has over 34,000 outstanding immigration appeals. The majority involve human rights claims used to frustrate removal. A government that cannot confine a Ukrainian visa scheme to Ukrainians, cannot deport foreign criminals without a years-long legal battle, and cannot close a route once the judiciary has opened it, does not have control of its borders. It has the appearance of control, maintained through press releases and ministerial statements, while the machinery of admission continues to operate on its own logic entirely independent of what Parliament intended. The government will point out that 3,464 represents a small fraction of the 279,000 visas issued under the scheme. The fraction is not the point. The countries of origin are the point. A system with no mechanism for distinguishing a Ukrainian fleeing Kyiv from an Afghan or Iranian entering on a family provision is not a security system. Every one of those 107 Iranians entered Britain in the same year their government was running assassination plots against British citizens on British soil. The Home Office knows this. MI5 has told them. A Ukrainian visa scheme that admits people from 112 countries is not a Ukrainian visa scheme. Somebody needs to explain what it is. "Ken McCallum, head of MI5, has publicly confirmed that ISKP, the Islamic State affiliate operating primarily across Afghanistan and Iran, is the single greatest overseas Islamist terror threat to Britain."

"A system with no mechanism for distinguishing a Ukrainian fleeing Kyiv from an Afghan or Iranian entering on a family provision is not a security system." x.com/i/status/2043046494840…

The Ideology Doesn't Stop at the Border. It Never Did. In Herat this week, Taliban security forces opened fire on protesters demonstrating against mandatory hijab orders. A fourteen-year-old boy, who had come to bring his brother home, was killed. Dozens were arrested. Door-to-door raids are now underway across the city, Taliban fighters stopping residents at checkpoints and searching their phones for images of women whose faces appeared in protest footage. Women have stopped leaving their homes. The injured are being treated in secret because those taken to hospital are arrested. This is the country from which tens of thousands of young men have crossed the Channel to reach Britain. This is the law they grew up under. This is the culture that formed them. In February, the Taliban published a sixty-page penal code signed by the supreme leader and distributed to courts across Afghanistan. It permits men to beat their wives provided the violence does not cause broken bones or open wounds. The maximum sentence for serious injury is fifteen days. To pursue a complaint, a woman must present her wounds in person to a male judge, fully veiled, accompanied by a male guardian. In the majority of domestic violence cases that guardian is the husband who committed the beating. A woman who flees to her parents without permission faces three months in prison. The family members who shelter her face the same. Justice is not merely difficult. It is structurally impossible by design. This is not a distant aberration. This is the enacted law of a country whose nationals have entered Britain in their thousands. Five of the seven men charged with forty grooming offences in Norwich arrived from Afghanistan by small boat. Two hundred and ninety-four Afghan nationals entered Britain on Ukrainian visas. Tens of thousands more have crossed the Channel since 2018, the overwhelming majority unvetted young men whose formation occurred under a legal and cultural framework that treats women as property, criminalises their autonomy and punishes any attempt at escape. The ideology does not stop at the border. It never has. Cultural attitudes are not checked at Dover alongside passports. The men who leave Afghanistan carry with them the values of a society where women cannot speak loudly inside their own homes, cannot leave without permission, cannot seek protection from the men who harm them, and can now be legally beaten provided the bones remain intact. Those values do not dissolve on contact with British soil. They are dispersed into British communities, British streets, British schools, with the full knowledge and active facilitation of a government that has read the same reports, been briefed by the same security services, and chosen to continue regardless. Sharia law as practised under the Taliban would endorse every element of what is happening in Herat. The mandatory covering. The punishment for non-compliance. The subordination of women to male authority in every domain of life. Britain already has Sharia councils operating alongside civil law. Already has communities where women's movement is restricted by cultural expectation. Already has areas where the state modifies its own behaviour for fear of communal reaction. The distance between Herat and certain British postcodes is shorter than the political class will admit. The government's response to all of this is to announce faster removal of social media posts about it. The terror watchdog raises the connection between mass migration and national security and receives silence. The boats continue. The dispersals continue. Somewhere in Britain tonight a woman is living under the same attitudes that are hunting women through the streets of Herat. The posts describing it will be removed more quickly next time. The government calls concern about the connection far right. They are legalising fear in Afghanistan. Britain is importing it. That is the story nobody in power will name.

Thank you for this post, Jim, highlighting what these women face on a daily basis. But also the government Afghan resettlement schemes. I remember reading that loads of Afghan men travelled under government routes illegally or came in as family members fraudulently. Who knows what they are upto now.