Things I support: cost-benefit analysis of public health interventions; understanding risk; accepting trade-offs; taking vaccines. Willing to change my mind.

Joined May 2013
1,068 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
5 Jun 2023
The inconvenient truth of our times. šŸ‘‡ "In the final analysis, these infringements generated negligible public health benefits while imposing a set of massive costs on society." #lockdown #CovidEnquiry
āš ļø Study charts how measures designed to save hundreds of thousands of lives may actually have done more harm than good telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/06…
1
3
12
2,252
Mark retweeted
The Mayor of London, Sir Sadiq Khan, continues to call for greater intervention and regulation of social media platforms that highlight rising crime in the capital. Khan has claimed that London has been subjected to a ā€œrelentless and unprecedented attack of lies and hatredā€ on social media. He now argues that online ā€œmisinformationā€ is deterring tourists from visiting the city. Yet Home Office data show that there were nearly 100,000 thefts or attempted thefts in London last year, compared with around 45,000 in 2019. Rather than trying to shut down criticism and debate, or blaming social media for London’s problems, the Mayor should focus on tackling rising crime and making the case for his own policies. More open discussion is not the problem. It is part of the solution.
132
899
2,275
24,557
Wonderfully simple research which, if the government had any desire to actually stop fraud, it could easily do itself.
I’ve been placing council transport spend, register-of-interest entries and Companies House filings next to each other. This is not an allegation. It is official records: registered interest → supplier/contract link → money in published spend. šŸ§µšŸ‘‡
1
12
Mark retweeted
I used to play Xbox 360 late into the morning when I was in school. My parents found out and started turning the router off at night. Amazingly they didn’t require a parliamentary majority and royal assent.
🚨 NEW: Keir Starmer will introduce nightly social media curfews for 16 and 17-year-olds as part of the Government's social media ban [@thetimes]
157
3,634
53,206
1,037,246
This isn't the start of the slippery slope - we're already sliding and the slide is accelerating... šŸ‘‡
A year ago Guido reported Labour would go after VPNs. The government's breezy dismissal was written up by the press. Eleven months later Liz Kendall says she will come back with new restrictions on VPNs as British policy to ban half of the internet falls apart. #carcrash
3
Mark retweeted
Don’t take it from me. Take it from one of the internet’s greatest pioneers @jimmy_wales
33
1,126
3,128
59,435
Mark retweeted
UK is a police state
JUST IN: UK Government clarifies adults will still be able to use social media by verifying their identities with digital IDs, facial recognition, passports and credit cards.
13,419
42,274
282,347
39,253,979
Mark retweeted
So true 🄲
25
109
1,026
16,514
Mark retweeted
> it’s not happening > it’s a right wing conspiracy theory > it may be happening > it’s happening and it’s good
JUST IN: UK Government clarifies adults will still be able to use social media by verifying their identities with digital IDs, facial recognition, passports and credit cards.
231
2,497
21,758
23,605,186
Mark retweeted
This censorship law is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. The real goal is to enable the UK government to track everyone.
It’s important to know that the social media ban for under 16s is not a ban for under 16s. It is a ban on *selected* social media for EVERYONE. Until you identify yourself.
9,732
43,321
228,327
16,465,513
Mark retweeted
It is literally insane simultaneously to think that 16 and 17 year olds are mature enough to vote but not mature enough to look at Instagram at 8:30pm. This is comically absurd.
🚨 NEW: Keir Starmer will introduce nightly social media curfews for 16 and 17-year-olds as part of the Government's social media ban [@thetimes]
182
2,133
16,440
439,832
You know what they say about the paving of the road to hell...
Christopher Snowdon of the Institute of Economic Affairs said: "We must stop judging new legislation by the good intentions of its advocates rather than its likely consequences. We know from Australia that most teenagers will get around the ban and that those who are not able to do so will suffer from social isolation. There are legitimate concerns about screen addiction among both children and adults, but parents are already able to restrict what their children see online and limit the number of hours they can use a smartphone. These guardrails are removed when kids log in via VPNs or sign up to platforms as adults. What the government is trying to do is reminiscent of attempts to ban the printing press. It is similarly impractical, illiberal and ultimately undesirable."
2
šŸ‘‡
The last sentence is the real meat and potatoes of this. What's being promoted as a 'social media ban for children', is really an ID check for every adult.
27
Mark retweeted
Replying to @MumsnetTowers
Powerless? Parents have all the power, actually - they just don’t want to use it
1
5
168
813
Mark retweeted
And the regime and its NPC pundits are trying to persuade voters that @elonmusk is ā€˜the disinformation’, while they run these operations on the domestic voters as if they’re in Afghanistan
One of those things where you try explaining it to not very political people and you just end up sounding completely mad dailymail.com/news/article-1…
45
587
2,581
103,064
Mark retweeted
This mean students up to Year 11 will not be able to revise GCSE biology on Freesciencelessons YouTube channel. This also mean a 15 years and 364 days old not be able to read Facebook posts from their MP or councillor, but expected to vote for them tomorrow.
🚨 NEW: Under-16s in the UK will be banned from the following 10 social media apps TikTok YouTube Snapchat Instagram X Reddit Facebook Twitch Kick Threads
364
3,594
47,084
2,143,838
šŸ‘‡
The government has now adopted two fundamentally contradictory positions: First, that 16 and 17-year olds are mature enough to vote. Second, that 16 and 17-year olds are not mature enough to manage their own social media use.
12
This is the most bonkers combination of policies I have ever read. This government now wants to legislate so that older teenagers are allowed to vote on our laws, but has their bed time set by the many state. šŸ‘‡ 🤯
Our schizophrenic government is giving the vote to people it doesn’t trust to be on social media in the evening.
19
Mark retweeted
🚨NEW: A Daily Mail investigation claims a "shadowy" government unit, named RICU, intervenes to write statements by the families of victims of potentially racially linked incidents to stop them from inflaming tensions further with their remarks [@DailyMail]
387
1,868
11,226
607,785
Mark retweeted
The uncomfortable truths Ed & govt refuse to confront: - Net zero policy is one of the biggest drivers of poverty & inequality - Net zero for the UK means nothing for global emissions - no-one meaningful is following our example Abandon it or condemn the economy and an entire generation to poverty.
Replying to @alexfmac
I made a handy diagram to understand the situation
3
38
126
4,740
Mark retweeted
I’ve referred Lord Hermer to the Bar Standards Board. He went after British soldiers despite warnings murder allegations were false. He knew what he was doing: he sought "wriggle room if the killings did not happen." It says everything that Starmer made him Attorney General.
857
6,706
21,210
402,485