Most people talk about institutional adoption like it's a race for attention. I think that's the wrong mental model. This is not a marketing competition. It's an infrastructure compounding game. And that changes everything. @zksync 🧵👇👇👇 1. In consumer tech, switching costs are low. You uninstall one app and install another. In settlement infrastructure, switching costs are structural. They involve operations, regulation, and counterparties not just software. 2. That means early deployments matter more than they first appear. Because once a regulated institution integrates a settlement layer into real workflows, it becomes part of how money actually moves. And that is not easily undone. 3. This is why live systems matter more than narratives. We are already seeing regulated activity move onchain: • Deutsche Bank’s tokenized fund platform (Memento) on ZK infrastructure • ADI Chain involving major institutional participants • Cari Network onboarding U.S. regional banks with large deposit bases These are operational systems, not theoretical ones. 4. A useful way to think about this is a logistics network. The first shipping ports don’t win because they are the biggest. They win because routes, customs processes, and infrastructure begin forming around them. Once that happens, trade naturally aggregates there. Settlement networks behave the same way. 5. The key point is this: Every live institution is not just a user of the network. It becomes part of the network’s topology. That topology then influences where the next institution chooses to build. This is where compounding begins. 6. The math is simple but powerful: 10 institutions create 45 possible settlement corridors. 100 institutions create nearly 5,000. Each new participant increases connectivity for everyone already inside the system. 7. This is why settlement networks don’t scale linearly. They scale as systems of relationships, not isolated integrations. And relationships especially regulated ones are expensive to rebuild elsewhere. 8.There’s also a second layer most people miss: Counterparty alignment. A bank doesn’t just choose infrastructure. It chooses compatibility with the institutions it expects to transact with in the future. That makes early clustering extremely influential. 9. This is where @zksync’s positioning becomes relevant. Not as a standalone chain, but as an integrated settlement environment with: • Privacy by design for institutional constraints • Institution-controlled deployment models • Cryptographic finality on Ethereum • Cross-chain interoperability for connected systems These properties matter because they reduce friction for regulated participation. 10.The analogy I keep coming back to is rail networks. A new rail line isn’t valuable because it exists. It’s valuable because it connects existing economic centers. But once multiple centers connect through the same rail system, rerouting becomes economically inefficient. 11. My conclusion is simple: In settlement infrastructure, the first meaningful deployments don’t just demonstrate viability. They begin shaping the future standard. And once that shaping starts, compounding not competition becomes the dominant force. That’s the real significance of 2026.

Optimization is one of the biggest opportunities in quantum computing. BCG projects quantum computing could create up to $850B in economic value by 2040. Optimization alone is estimated at $100B–$220B, comparable to the global cybersecurity or semiconductor equipment markets. D-Wave’s Advantage2 annealing quantum computer has 4,400 qubits and, with hybrid solvers, can support problems with up to 2M variables. Our roadmap moves toward Advantage3 systems with 20,000 and ultimately 100,000 qubits, expanding the size and complexity of optimization problems customers can tackle. The market is large. The use cases are real. And our customers are already seeing value. $QBTS #quantumcomputing