The left want to build a wall to keep people IN. The right want to build a wall to keep people OUT. That’s the difference…

Women want people to have rights. Men want people to have responsibilities. That's the difference.

All the arguments against giving women the vote were right. It turned out even worse than feared. Involving women in politics has harmed men, women, children, and civilization itself. Power is ultimately held by those who are willing to take it by force. Men were given the vote so that they would not need to take it by force. Women are incapable of taking power by force and therefore have no natural right to power. Women also have no natural instinct for leadership. Men evolved to provide leadership for both men and women. Most suicidal empathy and demands for DEI and equity are the result of feminine influence on politics. Empathy for criminals and terrorists, and opposition to the death penalty, is largely feminine. The desire for safe spaces, censorship, and for elevating being nice over being rational is feminine. The feminization of civilization is the weakening of civilization. Giving women the vote was a mistake.

Elections were conducted with physical paper ballots before technology existed. Why can’t we have electronic votes on everything? We don’t need representatives anymore…

5 letter .com domain are about to run out soon.

NVIDIA earnings today will confirm we are NOT in an AI bubble. Mark my words…

Always buying xxl clothes gives you more fabric for the money.

If everyone gets Discord, I don’t have to pay for international calls.

Real men take away rights

🚨Aluminium now at ALL TIME HIGH!

$EVO lägger hela kassan på Bitcoin! Hade varit det absolut bästa beslutet…

La Masculinidad y la Maternidad, las dos fuerzas más poderosas del universo. Las dos están bajo un furibundo ataque. Pregúntate por qué.

9 out of 10 new jobs created in Sweden, are Government jobs...

Feminism is the belief that women should have authority without responsibility, while men should have responsibility without authority.

> be an average Swede > keep only 20-30% of your income > pay 25% VAT on everything with already taxed money > pay 2% tax yearly if you decide to save instead > forced to pay for trash public service nobody watches every year > forced to pay for your funeral every year even if you're alive > btw they want to increase taxes more now > die (your funeral is already paid for)

Employing a thousand young men means a thousand women will likely marry and form a thousand new families. However, employing a thousand women could leave a thousand young men unemployed, potentially leading to a thousand women remaining unmarried. You can't prioritize jobs for a gender that naturally selfish, hoarding money, and doesn’t care about the extinction of their race, country, traditions, religion, and families. This is what’s contributing to declining birth rates by giving jobs to more women who primarily focus on themselves. You place selfish beings above givers.

Vi har officiellt nått slutstadiet av den svenska klimatpsykosen. Tänk vilken logik: Vi bränner flis, fångar röken i ett rör, hyr ett fartyg, åker till Norge och trycker ner skiten i en sandsten. Allt detta för att vi inte ska ”förstöra planeten” medan Kina bygger två nya kolkraftverk i veckan. Det är som att försöka dammsuga rymden med en dammsugare gjord av återvunnen tofu. Det kostar 10 miljarder, gör absolut ingenting, men ger eliten en anledning att ge varandra medaljer. Hur länge ska vi låtsas att det här är en rimlig prioritering? 😂🤡 Sverige i ett nötskal?

Why do politicians always ask the wealthy to give back when they took nothing out? Under capitalism, people get rich by adding value and fulfilling the needs of others. Why don't politicians ask people receiving welfare benefits to give back, as they actually take something out?