MASSACUSETTS AUDIT
(the whole state is engaged in political & legal theater; it's beyond embarrassing)
Case 1:25-cv-12881 — Quo Warranto Posture
[real, live, and public]
The record in 12881 makes this unmistakable: Massachusetts leadership has substituted political and legal theater for lawful performance.
A valid audit demand pathway existed. It was not speculative. It was not incomplete. The Supreme Judicial Court superintendence mechanism was identified, invoked, and fully drafted—with supporting materials—so that those charged with oversight could act immediately, without ambiguity or burden, delivering MA voters what they commanded.
But, they did not.
Those tasked with auditing the Legislature and enforcing transparency were presented with:
- a lawful demand,
- a defined jurisdictional route,
- and completed filing materials sufficient for immediate action.
Instead of acting, they remained engaged in administrative theater with one-another.
This is non-performance after opportunity. When officials with clear authority decline to act on a fully prepared audit demand—especially where public finance and bond governance are implicated—that failure speaks directly to their unfitness for office.
Quo warranto exists for precisely this condition: authority held, duty clear, action withheld. Now, my and the record of the court has foreclosed on notice.
What follows is measurement and consequence. The ousting of the unfit from their positions of service, never to be afforded an elected position again.
Some of those unfit to serve by record bound lawful demonstration:
@MassGovernor ,
@massauditor,
@MassAGO,
@MayorWu,
@SenWarren
For those who have, for over a year, continually went on and on about this audit; I have lawfully foreclosed the only path available to achieve this audit for those currently residing in seats of power; they now must be removed by lawful operation and replaced.
Y'all all want to take note:
@FallRiverReport,
@bostonbroadside,
@agenturban,
@ShortsleeveMA, @MikeMinogueABMD,
@islantstudio