I wonder if the same people complaining about how rapidly prices have been increasing over the last seventeen months, were also complaining about how rapidly prices were increasing four years ago? Coloradans continue to lead the nation, irrespective, when it comes to prices increases because of Colorado policies.

Data recently released by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics highlights that Colorado employers hired a total of 1,325,000 new employees during calendar year 2025 while 748,000 Coloradans quit their jobs, 453,000 were laid off as businesses downsized or closed, and 80,000 Coloradans either retired or died. Colorado thus added 44,000 new employees in 2025. At the end of the year, 110,000 job vacancies were reported.

The U.S, Bureau of Labor Statistics defines the civilian labor force as all people age 16 and older who are classified as either employed and unemployed. Conceptually, the labor force level is the number of people who are either working or actively looking for work.

According to data released by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics today, the national economy has provisionally added 409,000 new jobs for the period January though May 2026. This chart highlights those major industry sectors that have either added or lost payroll employees so far this year.

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported this morning that the U.S. economy provisionally added 172,000 new jobs in May 2026. This chart highlights those major industry sectors that either added or lost payroll jobs in May.

To illustrate how poorly maintained the Colorado voter roll, let me introduce you to a 2 bedroom unit on Parker Rd where, between July 2022 and October 2023, ninety-nine (99) individuals all with Middle Eastern names were newly added to the Colorado voter roll: 88% were women mostly aged in their 30s or 40s. None likely ever lived there and towards the end of whatever was going on, 31 new registrations were rushed through and added to the voter roll in October 2023 alone, usually in daily groups of 4, 5 or 6 scattered throughout the month. No one noticed. No alarm bells went off. As of now, all have an inactive status on the voter roll (everything election-related mailed to them has been returned undeliverable) BUT if there had been any basic checks and balances in place at the front end (does anyone else think it might be unusual that six people with different last names were added to the voter roll at a single residence the day after five other people were added there?) NONE ought to have EVER been added in the first place. Sadly, they will all stay on the CO voter roll until after the 2026 federal election (3 until after 2028) . This means that although they won’t be mailed ballots, they (or someone using their name) could potentially still vote in person at any Colorado election till then. It is nonetheless unlikely that this was fraudulent voter scheme because 5 individuals “accidentally” provided as a contact mailing address that of a secondary practice address for a National Insurance Provider. This tends to suggest a medicare / medicaid scheme where perhaps a service provider is billing Colorado taxpayers for a plethora of non-existent services provided to a plethora of non-existent individuals. But even though evidence of potential fraud against Colorado taxpayers is hiding in plain sight on the CO voter roll, it is unlikely that the CO Secretary of State even noticed. Or cares. What a joke the Colorado voter roll is! @SenatorHick @SenatorBennet @GovofCO @JenaGriswold @pweiser

Colorado is one of 26 loser states that still belong to the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC). The annual fee costs Colorado taxpayers around $50,000 a year. ERIC is supposed to help election officials maintain more accurate voter rolls and detect possible illegal voting. But it doesn't. It mostly monitors permanent change of address (NCOA) filings with the U.S. postal service that it inconsistently shares with the CO Secretary of State. (You can run the entire CO voter roll through NCOA data for $60. If the state did it every quarter, the cost would be $240.) The latest 2023 tax return for ERIC (they don't file timely) highlights that membership states paid a total of $1,605,480 to ERIC in 2023. That year ERIC spent $502,212 for salaries (three senior personnel and a junior), $93,389 for an annual software license (to whom?), $339,505 on legal fees with a fancy DC law firm (why?), and $220,322 on lobbying activities (who do they lobby and why?). They made a profit of $152,379 in 2023 and were sitting on $1,350,744 in cash at the end of that year. ERIC has a full copy of the Colorado voter roll but the CO Secretary of State won't share it with the DOJ because she's scared of what they will find. There is no election integrity in Colorado just lunatics in charge of the asylum.

My dude, @usnews literally rated Colorado the 2nd most dangerous state in 2025. denvergazette.com/2025/07/22… None of your lies, gaslighting and BS will go unchecked. #copolitics #coleg

Colorado's loony left wing commie Democrats don't care what the people of Colorado (or the nation's Supreme Court) think ...

"People are often bamboozled by the status and so-called authority of those doing the messaging such that they are encouraged to ‘outsource’ their health: transfer the responsibility of their bodily sovereignty to so-called experts and other presumed authorities. Mainstream disease messaging is directly linked to corporate pharmaceutical interests and the bio-warfare industry, both of which are instrumental in creating fear-based phenomena like ‘disease outbreaks’ and ‘pandemics’. Some people are more targeted than others playing on mechanisms of shame, duty and fear of public exposure so as to encourage compliance to undertake medical tests, treatments, prophylactics and more generally consume an array of ever-changing drug regimens." From an interview with Kevin Corbett, RN, PhD

CNFA is a non government organization (NGO) that received 99.8% of its revenue from the federal government in 2024, primarily USAID. According to the entity’s 2024 tax return, of the $70.1 million in taxpayer funds they received from (primarily) USAID in 2024, they re-distributed $4,192,474 to nine U.S. based entities, mostly fellow NGOs, but one was a Colorado based for-profit entity that received $231,412 to help with a project in Rwanda. This entity shares an address with the Denver-based NGO IDE although the IDE tax return doesn’t refer to it as a related entity. IDE nevertheless had revenues of $43.4 million in 2024, 95.13% of which came from public sources (USAID?). IDE doesn’t make grants but it creates income and livelihood opportunities for economically and socially disadvantaged households in 12 countries, and has more than 900 employees in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, serving millions of people in rural and peri-urban households.

The personal savings rate in the United States, which measures net personal savings as a percentage of disposable income, fell to 2.6% in April 2026 according the latest data release from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.

CNFA is a non government organization (NGO) that received 99.8% of its revenue from the federal government in 2024, primarily USAID. (The CEO earns $674,800 p.a.) The NGO’s latest tax return indicates CNFA has provided $3,307,013 in U.S. taxpayer provided grants to agricultural entrepreneurs in Russia and adjoining states. The cost to U.S. taxpayers for administering these grants has so far been $3,746,979 in payments to 99 employees and contractors in Russia. It doesn’t take a low IQ senator to work out that some of these funds are being used to help fund Russia’s war in the Ukraine, and Colorado’s two fine and upstanding federal Senators are perfectly fine with that. @Hickenlooper @MichaelBennet @SenatorBennet Why are we sending taxpayer dollars to Russia?

CNFA is a non government organization (NGO) that received 99.8% of its revenue from the federal government in 2024, primarily USAID. (The CEO earns $674,800 p.a.) The biggest grant they made in 2024 was $8,089,474 to a project in Zimbabwe. The expenses they incurred in making this grant were $22,479,219 part of which likely ended up in the pockets of corrupt government officials. On this one single project, CNFA spent $30,568,693 in U.S. taxpayer funds to indirectly or directly support one of the most evil, corrupt and draconian governments in the ENTIRE world. These are the sorts of wasteful and imbecilic projects Democrat politicians (like Colorado's two senators) support, encourage, and want to see more of. It is only taxpayer funds after all … @Hickenlooper @SenatorBennet

The Trump admin reportedly ran 67 million voter registrations through federal databases and flagged tens of thousands of possible non-citizens and deceased registrants. Now Colorado is pushing back. rockymountainvoice.com/2026/…

Solving sexual assault crimes like rape and sodomy aren't a priority for Democrat lawmakers in Colorado because they just don't care.