It’s not that simple. A lot of people don’t understand how the birthgap works and it shows.
That being said, it’s a strong indicator that the current system doesn’t make the world accommodating to aspiring/existing parents. In many countries (no longer just in the west) for the first time in modern history the current generation is set to be financially worse off than their parents. Capitalism has also atrophied every natural process of human interaction that ever existed, and the cult of the self is at its highest. Productivity demands in countries like Japan and South Korea are damn near anti-reproduction. But the long term consequences are not just “boohoo no more babies”. It means that by the time YOU are 70-75-80, the healthcare system (and other social services) will be so drastically underfunded by the taxes of a disappearing youth that you will likely live in pain, isolation, squalor, and helplessness with no hope of relief beyond suicide if you can manage to find the means of throwing yourself off something high enough. This is a frequent occurrence in Japan (where mind you, national wealth from past growth is still carrying the currently elderly, but that won’t last long).
Meanwhile, the youth that will labour to carry the larger older generations on their back will be enslaved by increasingly crippling tax constraints and decreasing available income/a shrinking labour force. I get it, I’m a feminist and the issue/injustice of the double burden for women - among other things tbh - goes without saying, but this doesn’t mean low birth rates alone are to be celebrated. Bodily autonomy = good. The right to go child free = good. Reproducing being so circumstantially unappealing that a SUBSTANTIAL number of people are choosing to be child free = an existential problem that is an unnatural and mathematically alarming progression for any mammal.
Things are not being adjusted to “what they should be” because we now have “more rights” and therefore can escape the “prison of motherhood”. At the end of the day rights are practically pointless when self-sustainance is impossible, which it will become for humanity with a widening birthgap. The two need to go hand in hand. Rights AND the capacity for self-sustainance in one’s lifetime and across generations. That is currently not the case and this is absolutely something to worry about.
It’s simply a mathematical problem. Please research it bc it’s just too long to illustrate in detail with the explanation and the nails I have to type with.
So yes, perhaps parenthood of any kind should not be a prison at all if our survival as civilisations is to be (and it very much is) dependent on it. Perhaps fragmenting the community and “healthy” cohabitation as a means of survival, and therefore making it impossible for young parents in an increasing number of places around the world to have access to “the village it takes to raise a child” is what needs to be undone.
Otherwise just send the floods or nuke us all. Fair play take. But a future with a scale tipped below the necessary birth minimum for a somewhat dignified survival of the human race is much grimmer than it looks. It’s pure misery for everyone. Research the birth gap problem. This isn’t only about women’s rights.
Can we all please wake up and realise that the falling birth rates are actually the CORRECT birth rates. More women are just finally having babies only when they want to, not when they are forced to.