my biggest lesson was in 2013 when i played dice with my 7 bitcoins and lost all but 0.5 of one which i sold for $500 when BTC hit $1000 for the first time. How i laughed as I made $290 more than the $210 the 7 coins had cost me 😂😂😂

FINAL REPORT(4th edit!): The Multisig Issue 🚨 OVERALL STATISTICS Total unique signers found: 3,919 Total unique wallets: 128,854 Total locked Pi identified: 48,720,888.77 Average wallets per signer: 32.9 Average locked Pi per wallet: 378.11 First activity (UTC): 6/2/2026 05:32 blockexplorer.minepi.com/mai… Last activity (UTC): 6/6/2026 03:47 blockexplorer.minepi.com/mai… Activity window (days): 3 days, 22 hours, and 15 minutes. Linked to known compromised/relay wallets of claim send victims Total wallets checked: 145,329 (from sweeps DB) Total matches found: 21339 Total signer entries (including duplicates): 21,339 Unique wallets with matches: 14,070 Unique signers found: 1,490 Total wallets with sweep signers: 86,385 - Sweep wallets: 14,070 (known compromised) - Additional wallets found: 72,315 (unknown compromised) I will keep the same files on Pastebin that i put up yesterday: pastebin.com/u/Bulby_bot All files are here in a 23mb zip: ufile.io/x8irmn23 The multisig_june_window_report.txt has the full blockchain rip; the other files are the data broken down to generate the info above. I have had people reach out and tell me a signer was added to their own wallet, so this is real. There is pretty strong evidence to suggest that while the window was open, scammers took full advantage of it from their database of compromised wallets. the blockchain data time and dates are -8 UTC in the files due to local machine time set on the public node Before you say its not true or cant happen make sure you have checked the data and come at me with data that shows your point, we can discuss this but only if you have the data. I do not claim there is an exploit or back door i am just saying there was a window where you could add key signers on the mainnet and scammers that already had the wallets secret used that window to add multisig to at least 86,385 wallets most likely more but that 86k are linked to known compromised/relay wallets where funds have been drained. #PiNetwork #SecurityAlert #Multisig #BlockchainSecurity

Let's see @itinajnr try and steal this 🤣 backend safely hidden the guy couldn't even get the pct wallets module he stole working

Does Blocking still mean the samem in 2026 as it did in 2009 because @bulbybot came with ALL the receipts, classic case of rip/recode claim it as your own creation! Can @itinajnr and @zyrachains recover from being caught #PiNetwork #BuildInPublic #Receipts #DeveloperDrama

Hi, I see you've blocked me on both @itinajnr @zyrachains, but that's not really a problem as I'm sure this will reach you. While I appreciate the edits you've made to your website, this doesn't address the underlying issue. The issue was never simply the wording or the numbers. The issue is that you publicly dismissed my concerns, denied any connection to my work, and effectively portrayed me as a liar when I raised them. Since then, multiple changes have been made to your site that directly relate to the points I raised. From my perspective, those changes validate the concerns that were originally dismissed. What I'm looking for is actually very simple: A public acknowledgment that CRUMBS and @bulbybot inspired or influenced parts of the project, and a public apology for dismissing my concerns and calling me a liar when I first brought them to your attention. Once that happens, I consider the matter resolved and we can both move on. #PiNetwork #BuildInPublic #Receipts #DeveloperDrama #CodeReview

Published the build history of the original Crumbs PCT Wallet Monitor. Includes: • screenshots • Discord logs • archived code “You didn’t copy anything.” zyrachain pct-wallet-monitor: lets see the build history. @itinajnr @Dappify_info @Dappify_HQ pct.crumbs.host/build-timeli…

#KamalaHarris #Biden

When you get a bath.

Impressive.. 🤯

Oof. Bless his heart. He tried his best — don’t ya know.

Dude eats a popsicle in one bite and finds out

Woman loses $800K disability case after photos emerge of her winning tree-throwing competition

Nope

Today is the one-year anniversary of @matthewtyrmand and his friend @danielrstrack leading a 6-hour Maoist “struggle session”-style board meeting flogging me for taking SUVs to meetings, stealing a pregnant lady’s sandwich, and amongst other things, claiming I’m a bad leader. I have a recording of that meeting that I never released. Matt Tyrmand said Project Veritas didn’t need James O’Keefe anymore and would be fine without him. That, along with his statement “You didn’t build that, your employees did” sounded right out of the Labor theory of value, one of the pillars of Marxism. He seemed to want the farm without the farmer or the golden eggs without the goose that produced them. This appears to be a common problem with nonprofits in general. Nobody owns anything; therefore, no good deed goes unpunished - if you have the wrong people involved. My main concern in the board meeting one year ago tonight while I sat there quietly being flogged for hours, was indemnifying our journalists because I knew the organization would run out of money if they voted me out. That action would leave our journalists, who needed defending, hung out to dry. The ongoing lawsuits affected 1st and 4th Amendment principles, particularly unconstitutional FBI raids and accompanying search warrants. I never settle lawsuits on principle, because I refuse to bear false witness on the 1st amendment and choose the highly difficult, expensive route of dying on every 1st amendment hill. The only way I can do this is by making the final decisions related to raising and apportioning money to litigation. Our cases remain in the circuit courts with some inevitably bound for the Supreme Court. Since making these final decisions and having the backs of our journalists is central to the sanctity and integrity of the journalism itself, my journalism and being the CEO and final decision-maker are inextricably linked. So, I had no choice but to ask the board to resign. They refused. They also refused to consider, or even fathom, the indemnification issue. The “struggle session” indicated they weren’t even interested in having a dialogue. They informed me I needed to take my lashings and feel remorseful. The entire board eventually resigned months later anyway, after they spent millions of dollars and were running out of money. It wasn’t until then that they started to confront the indemnification issue (you can ignore reality but you can’t ignore the consequences of ignoring reality), and began to send out emails asking their audience to pay the legal bills of those raided. Then, to the shock of the few remaining Project Veritas staff, leadership used what little money they raised off the fundraising emails, not to support legal defense, but to pay themselves. This irresponsible conduct was so unconscionable it led to the resignation of their own lawyer. I then had the impossible task ahead of somehow raising funds to pay Project Veritas journalists’ legal bills after being fired, while starting a new venture (OMG - O’Keefe Media Group) from scratch and with absolutely no infrastructure. If that wasn’t impossible enough, Project Veritas - the company I founded, then sued me and asked a Federal Judge in New York to issue an injunction to stop me from working. Now things started to seem demonic. All of this led most of Project Veritas’ donors and audience to believe the worst-case scenario - that people were compromised, pinched, or worse. While that is certainly possible, I don’t know that to be true. Although the timing did provide undeniable circumstantial evidence. What did Matt Tyrmand, Dan Strack, George Skakel, John Garvey and Joe Barton think people would were going to assume after taking such a drastic action of ‘indefinitely suspending” James O’Keefe only a week after the Pfizer story? Donors and the audience were going to conclude that the Project Veritas Board was evil, stupid, or compromised.

Anyone know a tool that allows you to mass unfollow people?

That's riiiight