This criticism misses the point entirely.
When Prime Minister Modi engages with the Indian diaspora abroad, he is not addressing a โtroupeโ; he is engaging one of Indiaโs greatest strategic assets. The Indian diaspora serves as a bridge between nations, strengthens economic and cultural ties, influences public opinion, and amplifies Indiaโs interests across the world.
Showcasing Indiaโs rich and diverse cultural heritage is not a distraction from diplomacy, it is diplomacy. Every major power invests in soft power because influence is built not only through negotiations behind closed doors but also through ideas, culture, identity, and people-to-people connections.
The results are visible. Indians today enjoy unprecedented visibility, respect, and stature globally. The diaspora has become a force multiplier for Indiaโs economic, technological, academic, and geopolitical influence. From boardrooms and universities to legislatures and innovation hubs, people of Indian origin are shaping global conversations while strengthening Indiaโs standing.
As for substantive engagement, Prime Minister Modiโs foreign visits routinely deliver outcomes on trade, technology, defence, energy, critical minerals, mobility, and strategic partnerships. Those agreements are negotiated and announced through official channels. Public outreach and diaspora engagement complement those efforts; they do not replace them.
Critics would do well to stop whining endlessly about optics and start engaging with outcomes. If there is substantive criticism to be made, make it. Dismissing cultural outreach and diaspora engagement merely reveals a poor understanding of how modern diplomacy and global influence actually work.
MEA needs a less clichรฉd and more serious script for the PM's visits abroad, one where he engages with his hosts on substantive issues, rather than his own accompanying troupe and Indians settled abroad.