Agency > Intelligence
I had this intuitively wrong for decades, I think due to a pervasive cultural veneration of intelligence, various entertainment/media, obsession with IQ etc. Agency is significantly more powerful and significantly more scarce. Are you hiring for agency? Are we educating for agency? Are you acting as if you had 10X agency?
Grok explanation is ~close:
âAgency, as a personality trait, refers to an individual's capacity to take initiative, make decisions, and exert control over their actions and environment. Itâs about being proactive rather than reactiveâsomeone with high agency doesnât just let life happen to them; they shape it. Think of it as a blend of self-efficacy, determination, and a sense of ownership over oneâs path.
People with strong agency tend to set goals and pursue them with confidence, even in the face of obstacles. Theyâre the type to say, âIâll figure it out,â and then actually do it. On the flip side, someone low in agency might feel more like a passenger in their own life, waiting for external forcesâlike luck, other people, or circumstancesâto dictate what happens next.
Itâs not quite the same as assertiveness or ambition, though it can overlap. Agency is quieter, more internalâitâs the belief that you *can* act, paired with the will to follow through. Psychologists often tie it to concepts like locus of control: high-agency folks lean toward an internal locus, feeling they steer their fate, while low-agency folks might lean external, seeing life as something that happens *to* them.â
Intelligence is on tap now so agency is even more important