Claude community Ambassador. Founder Claude Code Central London CCCL. Builder. Developer.

Joined June 2007
210 Photos and videos
Vikram Pawar retweeted
500 applied. 8 made the cut. in less than 48 hours, india’s first female founder residency takes over a house in bangalore for a week of pure shipping. engineering the future with @aigrantsindia, @Kalaari, @nebiusai, @AnthropicAI, @Contentstack. @nova_residency Cohort 0 is officially locked. june 7-13. let’s build. #deeptech #hackerhouse #startups #bangalore #founder #ai
11
5
103
8,747
Local voice is pretty good try @getducktype
Replying to @thdxr @0xblacklight
How are y’all doing dictation/voice w OpenCode? I work in a tight enterprise environment. So I have to be careful about any tools I use.
1
2
147
In the last 6 months I've had partnership conversations with hundreds of people. Almost none of them have stayed with me the way this one has. 🧵
1
5
499
If you build, this is one of those rooms worth being in. The best time to back people like this is before they need it. Proud to be in their corner. novatheresidency.com luma.com/cccl.blr4

1
2
374
Vikram Pawar retweeted
On June 14 I'll be mentoring at the Claude x Nova Buildathon in Bengaluru and I'm really looking forward to it. It’s girls-only and it’s for anyone who wants to push what they can build with Claude in a single day. Developers, founders, AI enthusiasts, first-timers welcome. The only requirement is that you show up. I’ll also be talking about how I landed the Anthropic AI Safety Fellowship in London as the only Indian selected this year and what that path actually looked like. Thank you @pawar Sir for creating spaces like this. Would love to see you all there!!! Girls - register now. The room is yours luma.com/cccl.blr4?tk=EsE7OO
26
8
94
16,912
Monday 7pm GMT — CCCL Deep Dive: AI Adoption Challenges Got an AI challenge at work? Bring it. Got experience? Even better. Pick your role: 🙋 I need input 🤝 I can help Max 10 spots. Use Claude to prep your challenge beforehand. luma.com/xl0tline
2
6
727
Monday 6pm GMT — CCCL Dailys: Claude Code Tips & Tricks 30 min drop-in. Shortcuts, workflows, and lesser-known features to level up your Claude Code usage. Bring your own tips to share. Free on Google Meet. Spots limited. luma.com/qrzqwjgh
2
6
493
Yes worry about having better quality rather than having more quantity.
Mar 9
i really don't care about using AI to ship more stuff it's really hard to come up with stuff worth shipping i want to ship the same amount of stuff with higher quality both in product and code
1
419
London tech ecosystem map — 251 AI labs, VCs, fintechs, and startups 🔥 by @b1rdmania londonmaxxxing.com
5
327
Vikram Pawar retweeted
London tech and ai scene heatmap. Adding more now. Will sync to office spaces next week. londonmaxxxing.com/
94
63
740
173,311
Vikram Pawar retweeted
Mar 7
once we hit a bit more stability my goal is to have opencode running as a service so when you launch tui, web, desktop it's all just connecting to a same process if you can assume there's an agent always running ready for work a lot of interesting things can be built on top
106
20
1,383
51,405
Vikram Pawar retweeted
Mar 6
in my culture we don't say "I love you". we say "I left a comment on your PR that's a prompt you can just send straight to Claude Code"
92
98
1,956
96,461
Vikram Pawar retweeted
People get high on abstraction too early. They want the system before they’ve earned the insight. But the good abstractions are never designed. They’re discovered. You do the stupid manual thing enough times and the real bottleneck just emerges. Your initial agency might be driven by a hunch you had in the shower, but that moment won’t get you all the way to making something people want. The right way to make anything is forced on you by reality: what are the real jobs to be done? And what sequence? This is why “do things that don’t scale” still hits, especially now when AI makes it trivially easy to scale things that probably shouldn’t be scaled yet. PG’s point was never about suffering. It was about contact. When you’re the one manually doing the loop, you see the edge cases. The weird user behavior. The failure modes nobody designed for. The hidden dependencies that only show up at 2am when some flow or intermediate step breaks in a way you didn’t anticipate. If you automate before you have that contact, you just scale your misunderstanding faster. When the machines can help you vibe code perfection it gives you a false sense of power. I love that feeling as much as you do. But fuck perfection. Do it live. Be the loop. Feel every friction point. Notice what’s actually true every single time versus what just looked true because you hadn’t seen enough cases yet. Formalize that. Build the recursive version. Then keep checking that your abstraction is still attached to real humans and their needs. Because reality drifts. Your users drift. The ground truth changes under you. You may think you understand but no plan survives contact with the real users and what they want. You find those body blows in analytics and user feedback and we call them the roadmap. Humans left with not enough data hallucinate too. But just like the LLMs with enough data you unlock real transcendence. Real utility. Prosperity for humans in real life. The abstraction is a tool, not a destination. The moment you forget that, you’re cooked.
152
238
1,925
188,363
What I say to anyone who tells me AI, more specifically Claude Code, doesn't do what they expect.
Until you spend 100 hours beating up & getting beaten up by Cowork, Claude Code, Codex, etc, do not tell me that "the technology isn't there." The technology is basically "there" for 99% of knowledge work.
2
150