“If that is indeed true, to me it means blockchain is a much less exciting technology”
Is Solana is an anti-blockchain blockchain?
lol, guess I'm the only person at Delphi who's not a Solana bull. . .I have nothing against Solana & it seems some cool people are building some cool stuff there, but I quite literally don't get the point of it no matter how much I read about it. . .if high speed/low cost is your top priority centralized databases seem fine (and always intrinsically better in those dimensions than a blockchain network), and the only thesis I see from Solana bulls is "faster/cheaper" (please do correct me if I'm missing something). . .about the best steelman long-term Solana investment thesis I can come up with is the notion that perhaps people like the openness and composability of blockchains, don't care much about censorship resistance, and therefore want a more performant blockchain even if that means there is no coherent plan for achieving an adamantium level of censorship resistance w/ fast/cheap/abundant light client zkP verification etc. . . .the abundant use of ETH L2s that are even *more* trustful than Solana would also tend to support this idea about what people are looking for in their chains. . .if that's true, then probably most of Ethereum's features are pointless/wasteful and Solana or a chain striking similar design tradeoffs would 'win' . . . If that is indeed true, to me it means blockchain is a much less exciting technology--essentially just a sort of 'surprisingly performant somewhat decentralized open network' vs the much more radical proposition of an autonomous cryptosystem where humanity rediscovers freedom