life can actually be quite fun when you assume other people are taking this same approach
like the person who cuts you off on the highway, your reaction can be "oh, you're playing a game where getting to your destination is the absolute most important thing in the world, and you get to act all stressed & angry... that's a neat little game"
and then notice the games that *you're* playing, the things that you are pretending are of existential importance, and decide whether you actually like those games
two frames we want to be able to shift between:
1) life is fun, joyful, an exercise in abundance. at the highest level, there are no real stakes, or none that we know with certainty. there is no objective "should", no punishment for living a bad life. you are free to be as you are. life is an infinite game
2) creating the life you want is an exercise in scarcity. there is limited time & energy, and the stakes are real: it is possible to get it wrong. there are things you should & should not do, when it comes to your concrete objective. life as a finite game
when we're caught up in #2, life feels very unpleasant. but when we choose to enter #2 from the broader frame of #1, it's like getting very involved in a game of tennis: we are very intense in our focus, we cry when we lose, we smash our racket on the ground... but then we walk away, and remember it's not the end of the world
too much of #1, on the other hand, feels ungrounded, directionless, dull. stakes are fun! creating something bounded is exciting! a refusal to take on real stakes is the puer aeternus archetype, and it leads to a drifting through life
engage with scarcity & risk, but remember what you are. that's the dance