*Do active funds beat their benchmarks?*
That question has bothered me ever since I discovered low-cost, well-diversified index funds.
Depending on which report you read, you'll find very different answers. Some say 80% of active funds beat their benchmarks. Others say fewer than 50% do. Rather than relying on someone else's study, I decided to dig into the data myself.
But I wanted to go a step further.
The real question isn't whether a randomly selected active fund can beat the index. Most investors don't pick funds randomly. We look at past performance, fund managers, investment style, consistency, and a host of other factors.
So the question becomes: can we use that information to improve our odds of choosing a fund that will beat the index in the future?
To explore that, I started analyzing the data. This is the first video in what will be a longer series where we'll look at the evidence, test different approaches, and see what actually works.
If you find this useful, please take the time to watch the video, look at the data for yourself, and make an informed decision. And if you enjoy the content, do hit the like button on YouTube. It helps more people discover these discussions
Link in next tweet