BREAKING: Michael Saylor does his best retarded pleb impression on stage at @BTCPrague, says plebs don't even have half a brain.

JUST IN: SEC prepares to legalize blockchain-based, tokenized stock trading.

1 coin. 1 reason you haven't sold. Shill me.

#Litecoin to $100 is plausible soon. And then a break over resistance and full-on explosion?! It can happen! 🚀🪐🔥 $LTC #LTC #Hodling New swing is forming

$DOGE in preparation for a massive breakout $2-$5 price targets seem not far-fetched It's going to lead the altcoins bull run as it did in 2021

Unreal. They want nationalized AI. We can’t even do healthcare, education, investment right or even basic governance, What makes you think the government will excel at AI? 😫 The only thing Globe & Mail should be doing is using AI so they don’t write dumb 💩 like this.

OpenAI has shown it cannot be trusted. Canada needs nationalized, public AI theglobeandmail.com/business…

> Over the coming months, Base is moving away from the OP Stack, however, we’ll continue to work with Optimism as a client of OP Enterprise: Mission-Critical Support The 15% sequencer revenue share is ominously not mentioned. However, it looks like they will be paying OP Labs to be a consultant. Base made up around 3/4 of ETH sent to Optimism governance (notably not in possession of governance, but Optimism Foundation). Unless there are some key details missing here, this looks not good for OP tokenholders, whose dilution financed Base joining the Superchain in the first place (118,111,595 OP grant) Large holders of OP would not be remiss to ask for clarification about what this means for the revenue accruing to OP governance, and how much of that grant will be clawed back. It’s also a demonstration of major conflict of interest if Labs gets consulting fees and OP holders do indeed lose this 15% sequencer fee share from Base.

Thought for the day: if you are advocating for incentive incompatible features, or other features push to rearchitect Bitcoin to be easier to selectively filter transactions, you may have mistakenly found yourself attacking Bitcoin's decentralization and key properties.

That's simply not true at all. The entire point of the Chainlink Reserve is to allow for offchain revenue to accrue to the token via onchain token buybacks. The token isn't circumvented. If an institution has to pay in fiat denomination via offchain dollars via a legal agreement via a legally recognized entity, you think they're supposed to say: "No, sorry, we won't take your money and convert it into LINK tokens." There is no dual competing stakeholders. There is no "double dipping" like what Ripple Labs or Uniswap Labs.

Hey @adam3us , was Jeffrey Epstein a jolly good fellow when you met him in St. Thomas? He wrote later that he liked you. @Blockstream @BlockstreamJade Does Epstein’s estate still hold shares in your company today? How about press release? @CoinDesk @Cointelegraph @TheBlock__

On to more productive conversations. Here is a great one I just received: --- i had a feedback/suggestions, i wanted to talk about something positive lol. i think we all agree that Square needs to improve, but tbf, it’s a new function, and stress tests like today will make it better overtime. it’s a good app, and many new users are joining so that’s a good thing. i have a suggestion about Binance Junior. great app, great idea. my son loves it. he has his wallet for a month and half now, and it even had an impact irl. he’s super happy. and we are. pretty sure the app is gonna evolve soon, with more to come. i was thinking why not adding a few features like for example the kids crypto tasks : good results at school, clean your room, be kind etc, to unlock (automatically?) rewards from parents. it’ll work very well, and add a real life value to it. it worked pretty well in my case. 1 month of use, better results at school for example. would be great for parents to have the possibility to create any type of « tasks » for their kids. just sharing an idea.