Who said you can’t be a billionaire by being employed! Tom Mueller. SpaceX employee #1, his 0.06% stake is now worth ~1.11 billion!!

I was tasked by the White House, AARO, ODNI, the FBI, and the Intelligence Community to lead and assemble a team of scientists and experts for a new UAP Science Advisory Council. The council includes Prof. Carol Cleland: anomaly identification; Dr. Richard Cloete (@RichAC2020): data analysis and AI tools; Dr. Omer Eldadi: data management, AI, and human psychology; Dr. Tim Gallaudet (@GallaudetTim): oceanography; Ross Howard: communication; Dr. Devesh Nandal: numerical analysis and astrophysics; Prof. Garry Nolan (@GarryPNolan): molecular biology and materials science; Dr. Regina Sarmiento: data analysis and AI-assisted data management; Dr. Michael Shermer (@michaelshermer): the study of anomalies; Prof. Peter Skafish: anthropology; Prof. Matthew Szydagis: instrumentation and data collection; and Dr. Jennice Vilhauer: quantitative psychology. This constitutes an amazing A-team of exceptional scientists and experts.

Garry Nolan Says CIA-Linked Officials Brought Him MRI Evidence of Unexplained Injuries, and Some Cases Involved UFO Claims *Science / Research Dr. Garry Nolan gives an unusual account of how he first became involved in UAP-related research, and it is not simply a story about UFO sightings. In this clip, Nolan says his involvement began after his analysis of the Atacama specimen, when two people came to his Stanford office unannounced. According to Nolan, one was a representative connected to the CIA, and the other was connected to an aerospace company. They were not initially presenting him with a standard UFO case. They were presenting him with a medical problem. Nolan says they told him they had collected a group of people into what they called the “weird bucket.” These were cases involving civilians, diplomats, military personnel, or intelligence-linked individuals who had developed unexplained health effects. According to Nolan, these cases had first moved through medical channels because physicians were seeing damage or symptoms they could not easily explain. He says the cases then moved into an intelligence context because enough of them were beginning to look similar to one another. That is one of the most interesting details in the clip. The claim is not that someone saw a strange object and then people immediately concluded “UFO.” The claim is that there were unexplained medical cases, with imaging and health effects, and that these cases were being collected because they appeared to share certain patterns. Nolan says some of the affected people were diplomatic or intelligence officers who were becoming sick and developing severe problems. He says the visitors showed him MRIs, X-rays, and biomedical imaging. He describes the damage as clear and serious, including damage inside the body or brain, and specifically mentions white matter disease. According to Nolan, the medical damage itself was not vague or imaginary. He says the imaging showed real damage. The unresolved question was what caused it. The UAP connection comes in as a second layer. Nolan says that a very small subset of these individuals had also claimed interactions with UFOs. That wording matters. He is not saying every unexplained medical case was caused by UFOs. He is not saying the imaging proves non-human technology. He is not saying this is direct proof of alien contact. The more careful reading is that intelligence-linked people brought him unexplained medical imaging cases, and within that broader group, a small number of individuals also reported UFO interactions. That makes the story significant, but also difficult. If true, this suggests there may have been an overlap between unexplained health cases, intelligence collection, aerospace interest, and UAP-related witness claims. But without the underlying medical records, case histories, timelines, diagnostic workups, and chain of custody, the public cannot evaluate what the actual connection was. There are several possibilities. One possibility is that these were medical cases later associated with UAP claims because some witnesses reported unusual encounters. Another possibility is that some of the cases were related to directed energy exposure, environmental factors, classified technology, or something similar to what later became publicly discussed under Havana syndrome-type concerns. Another possibility is that the UAP connection was incidental, misunderstood, or only present in a small number of reports. And of course, the more extraordinary possibility is that some physical health effects may have been associated with close proximity to unknown aerial or technological phenomena. But that last possibility requires a much higher evidentiary standard. This is why the distinction between data, evidence, and proof matters. MRI and X-ray findings could show that damage exists. They do not automatically prove what caused the damage. A witness report could establish that someone claims a UFO interaction occurred. It does not automatically prove that the interaction caused the medical findings. The important question is whether the medical timeline, exposure history, witness report, and technical data all line up. For example: Did the symptoms begin immediately after the alleged encounter? Were there multiple witnesses? Was there any radar, infrared, satellite, or sensor data connected to the event? Were the affected individuals evaluated by independent physicians? Were alternative explanations ruled out? Were the medical findings consistent across cases? Were the alleged UAP-related cases different from the non-UAP cases in the same “weird bucket”? Were these cases ever reviewed by a scientific panel outside intelligence channels? Was any of this connected to classified aerospace programs, foreign adversary technology, directed energy research, or something genuinely anomalous? Those are the questions that would matter. For me, the most important part of Nolan’s account is not simply that UFOs were mentioned. It is that the UAP issue, according to him, entered his world through medical imaging, biological effects, intelligence-linked collection, and unexplained injury cases. That is a very different category from blurry videos or anonymous stories. But it is also exactly the kind of claim that needs documentation. If there are real MRI and X-ray records connected to unexplained injury cases, and if some of those cases also involved UAP interaction claims, then this should be investigated with serious medical and scientific standards. Not as entertainment. Not as belief. Not as debunking by default. As a documented medical and intelligence question. At the same time, caution is necessary. This clip does not prove that UFOs caused brain injuries. It does not prove non-human intelligence. It does not provide the raw scans, the patient files, or the investigative records. What it does provide is a claim from Garry Nolan that his entry into UAP research began when CIA-linked and aerospace-connected individuals brought him unexplained medical cases, and that a small subset of those cases included UFO interaction claims. If accurate, that is a serious and under-discussed part of the UAP story. The public should not be asked to accept it on trust alone. But it also should not be dismissed without seeing the underlying evidence.

The world deserves to know the truth. Watch now on Prime Video.

Chris Mellon: "Dr James Lacatski says he put his head inside of a Spaceship" 👽🛸😱 James Lacatski, a former intelligence officer was in charge of AAWSAP which was a secretive U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) study initiated in 2008 to investigate unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) If this is true we need Dr Lacatski to testify under oath to congress. Reality should not be classified.

Read between the lines, people. The individuals pushing for disclosure are now working directly with the administration, and we have support at the highest levels.

🚨: Scientists may have found a way for consciousness to travel through space-time after death.

UFO Disclosure Deception 843: The War That Prepares the Antichrist #ufo

⭕ David Grusch (former U.S. intelligence officer) — Recent interview/comments (June 13–14, 2026). “I did get access to crash retrieval photos and everything so I’ve seen the recovered vehicles… They were everything from flying discs to egg shape craft & every other morphology. They landed or crashed on the surface of the earth.” (He called it “the most earth shattering thing that changed my world view.”) @POTUS @timburchett @realannapaulina @EricBurlison #UFO

The ripple effect of a single awakened soul ​For a long time, we walk through life blending into the background, following the crowd, and living on autopilot. We become part of the collective fog—until something shifts inside. ​Self-awakening starts in complete isolation. It’s that moment you choose to stop blending in, step into your truth, and ignite your own inner light. At first, you might feel like the odd one out, standing bright in a sea of shadows. But true awakening is never selfish; it is infectious. ​When you dare to heal, to question, and to shine, you create a ripple effect. You unconsciously give everyone around you permission to do the exact same. One turns into ten, ten turns into a hundred, until the entire collective shifts. ​Don't be afraid to stand out. The world doesn't need more people blending in—it needs you to wake up and light the way ✨🙌🏿💫

Bryce Zabel: "If there are 17 different ALIEN races & some are interdimensional - This is going to freak people out" 👽 "There are 2 sides to UFO Disclosure - People have a right to know & they may not be able handle the truth" "I am in favour of disclosure, let me decide if I can handle it" Catastrophic disclosure could cause ontological shock. Bryce told AJ from The Why Files everybody has the right to know.

Bryce Zabel: "If there are 17 different ALIEN races & some are interdimensional - This is going to freak people out" 👽 "There are 2 sides to UFO Disclosure - People have a right to know & they may not be able handle the truth" "I am in favour of disclosure, let me decide if I can handle it" Catastrophic disclosure could cause ontological shock. Bryce told AJ from The Why Files everybody has the right to know.

This mind blowing scene from Arrival (2016) when the heptapods start 'Writing' their circular logograms on the glass. No beginning, no end & totally non linear. 👽🤯 This alien language is inspired by the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis: The idea that the structure of a language shapes how you think and perceive reality. Could real aliens communicate like this with visual, holistic symbols instead of linear words or sounds? It's fictional, but linguists say alien languages could be radically different & maybe even rewiring our brains if we learned them.

Will @POTUS over-promise and under-deliver on Disclosure? What do you think? #ufotwitter #ufoX #UFOs #UAPs

Peter Skafish Says Extraterrestrial and Interdimensional UAP Explanations May Not Be Mutually Exclusive *Discussion In this Fox News segment, Peter Skafish is asked about one of the most difficult questions in the UAP discussion: Are these things extraterrestrial, interdimensional, or something else? His answer is interesting because he does not treat those categories as necessarily opposed. Skafish says that some of this is probably extraterrestrial. But he also says we should remain open to the possibility that these things may be coming from elsewhere in space as we know it, while also potentially involving effects on space time or something like higher dimensional space. The key point is his final distinction. He says that the idea of higher dimensional space is not incompatible with the idea that these things could come from an extraterrestrial source. That matters because a lot of UAP discussions frame the issue as a choice between two competing models: Either they are extraterrestrial visitors from another planet. Or they are interdimensional beings or phenomena. But Skafish is suggesting that this may be the wrong way to frame the question. A civilization or intelligence could still be extraterrestrial in origin, while using a method of travel, interaction, or appearance that involves space time manipulation or higher dimensional physics. In other words, “extraterrestrial” may describe where they come from. “Interdimensional” or “higher dimensional” may describe how they get here, how they operate, or how we perceive them. That distinction could explain why the UAP topic often becomes so difficult to categorize. If an intelligence is not limited to ordinary propulsion through normal space, then our usual categories may not be enough. This post is not claiming that UAP are proven to be extraterrestrial. It is not claiming that higher dimensional travel is proven. It is not claiming that interdimensional explanations are established fact. The point is more specific: Peter Skafish is arguing that the extraterrestrial hypothesis and higher dimensional models do not have to cancel each other out. For me, that is one of the more useful ways to think about the subject. The real question may not be: Are they extraterrestrial or interdimensional? The better question may be: Could an extraterrestrial intelligence use physics that appears interdimensional from our point of view?

Our advisory board member Avi Loeb announces that the White House, AARO, and ODNI have asked him to assemble and lead a new UAP Science Advisory Council, bringing scientific rigor to the study of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. disclosure.org/news/uap-scie…