Appreciate the engagement from
@oren_cass -- sounds like we agree on the extent to which many communities depend economically on Medicaid, SNAP, and other transfer programs. The question is how to move forward
This is the inevitable endpoint of an economic model that concentrates gains in a narrow set of sector and geographies and then promises that the "winners can compensate the losers." Huge swathes of the country literally become "exporters of need," depending upon their eligibility for government transfers to keep their economies going.
Economists will score this as successful -- look, consumption went up! But it is totally unsustainable, economically and politically. That's not an argument against a strong safety net, it's an argument against a politics that treats a strong safety net as somehow the equivalent of, or a plausible alternative to, an economy that spreads investment and production widely.