Wow - merci @joinstationf :) x.com/joinstationf/status/96…

Contrefaçon... ou pas ? Ce que vous avez le droit de faire avec l'IA journaldunet.com/intelligenc…

Marc Theermann (Boston Dynamics) : "Boston Dynamics débutera la commercialisation du robot Atlas en début d'année", par @scoolada : journaldunet.com/intelligenc… via @journaldunet

La situation sur les multiples et la valorisation des principaux acteurs de l'IA fondationnelle.

This paper shows that you can predict actual purchase intent (90% accuracy) by asking an LLM to impersonate a customer with a demographic profile, giving it a product & having it give its impressions, which another AI rates. No fine-tuning or training & beats classic ML methods.

Interesting. I would bet on : 2 - 5 - 7 - 14 - 17 Let’s also see what Meta will release.

😯

The invention of modern writing instruments like the typewriter made writing easier, but they also led to the rise of writer’s block, where deciding what to write became the bottleneck. Similarly, the invention of agentic coding assistants has led to a new builder’s block, where the holdup is deciding what to build. I call this the Product Management Bottleneck. Product management is the art and science of deciding what to build. Because highly agentic coding accelerates the writing of software to a given product specification, deciding what to build is the new bottleneck, especially in early-stage projects. As the teams I work with take advantage of agentic coders, I increasingly value product managers (PMs) who have very high user empathy and can make product decisions quickly, so the speed of product decision-making matches the speed of coding. PMs with high user empathy can make decisions by gut and get them right a lot of the time. As new information comes in, they can keep refining their mental models of what users like or do not like — and thereby refine their gut — and keep making fast decisions of increasing quality. Many tactics are available to get user feedback and other forms of data that shape our beliefs about users. They include conversations with a handful of users, focus groups, surveys, and A/B tests on scaled products. But to drive progress at GenAI speed, I find that synthesizing all these sources of data in a PM's gut helps us move faster. Let me illustrate with an example. Recently, my team debated which of 4 features users would prefer. I had my instincts, but none of us were sure, so we surveyed about 1,000 users. The results contradicted my initial beliefs — I was wrong! So what was the right thing to do at this point? - Option 1: Go by the survey and build what users told us clearly they prefer. - Option 2: Examine the survey data in detail to see how it changes my beliefs about what users want. That is, refine my mental model of users. Then use my revised mental model to decide what to do. Even though some would consider Option 1 the “data-driven” way to make decisions, I consider this an inferior approach for most projects. Surveys may be flawed. Further, taking time to run a survey before making a decision results in slow decision-making. In contrast, using Option 2, the survey results give much more generalizable information that can help me shape not just this decision, but many others as well. And it lets me process this one piece of data alongside all the user conversations, surveys, market reports, and observations of user behavior when they’re engaging with our product to form a much fuller view on how to serve users. Ultimately, that mental model drives my product decisions. Of course, this technique does not always scale. For example, with programmatic online advertising in which AI might try to optimize the number of clicks on ads shown, an automated system conducts far more experiments in parallel and gathers data on what users do and do not click on, to filter through a PM's mental model of users. When a system needs to make a huge number of decisions, such as what ads to show (or products to recommend) on a huge number of pages, PM review and human intuition do not scale. But in products where a team is making a small number of critical decisions such as what key features to prioritize, I find that data — used to help build a good mental model of the user, which is then applied to make decisions very quickly — is still the best way to drive rapid progress and relieve the Product Management Bottleneck. [Original text: deeplearning.ai/the-batch/is… ]

Very interesting demo on how to make infinite videos

Yes, our team of 30 could fit in a small restaurant. But we serve 50 million users profitably while most AI startups burn millions serving thousands. The future belongs to tiny teams of extraordinary people.

I think I'm the first person to generate more than 8 items into a single image using Google Gemini Flash Image (Nano Banana). I have even exceeded the 8 upload limit on Freepik. How did I do this? Create a collage with everything and label each item on the image. When you upload the image, be descriptive and give each item the same name you labeled it on the image. Look at the end result, 10 items in a single image with excellent accuracy (Only thing not super accurate is the watch). I think this method is even more accurate than uploading individual photos. Go and try it! The prompt I used to generate 10 items into a single image is as follows: A man is standing in a modern electronic store analyzing a digital camera. He is wearing a watch. On the table in front of him are sunglasses, headphones on a stand, a shoe, a helmet and a sneaker, a white sneaker and a black sneaker

That’s very cool! 🎥

Meanwhile Jensen Huang is somewhere quietly counting his GPU money💰

The next Walt Disney could be a 12-year-old making a brilliant movie from their bedroom and sharing it on YouTube. These are exciting times! 🍿

I'm thrilled to announce the definitive course on Claude Code, created with @AnthropicAI and taught by Elie Schoppik @eschoppik. If you want to use highly agentic coding - where AI works autonomously for many minutes or longer, not just completing code snippets - this is it. Claude Code has been a game-changer for many developers (including me!), but there's real depth to using it well. This comprehensive course covers everything from fundamentals to advanced patterns. After this short course, you'll be able to: - Orchestrate multiple Claude subagents to work on different parts of your codebase simultaneously - Tag Claude in GitHub issues and have it autonomously create, review, and merge pull requests - Transform messy Jupyter notebooks into clean, production-ready dashboards - Use MCP tools like Playwright so Claude can see what's wrong with your UI and fix it autonomously Whether you're new to Claude Code or already using it, you'll discover powerful capabilities that can fundamentally change how you build software. I'm very excited about what agentic coding lets everyone now do. Please take this course! deeplearning.ai/short-course…

Shipped: $FIG x.com/i/broadcasts/1rmGPyozR…

Today, we’re introducing Video Overviews in @NotebookLM — a visual alternative to Audio Overviews. Dive deeper with short, engaging slide summaries using images, diagrams, quotes and data from your sources, narrated by your AI host.

Cliff Obrecht (cofondateur de Canva) : "L'an dernier, 0,2% des images importées dans @canva venaient de #ChatGPT contre 5% cette année" journaldunet.com/collaborati… par @scoolada via @journaldunet

Cliff Obrecht (cofondateur de @canva) : "L'an dernier, 0,2% des images importées dans Canva venaient de #ChatGPT, contre 5% cette année" journaldunet.com/collaborati… par @scoolada via @journaldunet

Mike Krieger (@AnthropicAI) : "Anthropic fait le choix de rester très focalisé sur quelques usages clés pour viser l'excellence" journaldunet.com/intelligenc… par @scoolada via @journaldunet

Thomas Wolf (@huggingface) : "#HuggingFace veut démocratiser la robotique grâce à l'#opensource" journaldunet.com/intelligenc… par @scoolada via @journaldunet